Category Archives: Uncategorized


Quick … name one successful program Obama and the Democratically controlled Congress has been able to implement.  You can’t because there aren’t any.

The fact is that Obama and his administration have shown themselves to be staggering incompetent, demonstrating a dangerous lack of understanding about the Republic of the United States and its people that is unmatched in the history of this country.

Obama is not now, nor has he ever been a great leader.  He doesn’t have the tools or temperament for great leadership. Forgetting his narcissism for moment and his inability to complete a coherent sentence without his teleprompter, this is a man who loves campaigning and being in the spotlight but clearly dislikes governing.

In contrast, Bill Clinton loves the political process … loves governing and his record of accomplishment demonstrates that.  He remains a pragmatic politician, a visionary in tune with mores of this country, a man capable of moving people, building consensus.

There can be no clearer example of his leadership skills than a look at the Clinton Foundation.  The foundation works with corporations around the world to foster change and innovation through cooperation.

This morning’s announcement from the Clinton Foundation is a striking example of Clinton’s abilities. It was just announced that Pepsi has made a decision to stop providing sugared drinks to schools on a worldwide basis. WOW! This is great news given the number of severely obese kids in this country; accomplished without government interference … a concept unknown to the Obama administration.

Obama remains an empty suit, the blank slate (as he personally acknowledges) upon which people foolishly project their dreams.  This is no surprise.  His background, lack of genuine political experience, and abysmal record once elected to office, all trumpeted preordained failure … it was there in plain sight.  All one had to do was to look at Obama the man instead of Obama the media created illusion.

He’s told us he loves the sound of the Muslim call to prayer and he proclaims himself to be a Citizen of the World. Obama’s continued refusal to provide documents that clarify his citizenship status  at birth (once and for all) reminds us of the  man  who couldn’t bear to recite the Pledge of Allegiance with his hand across his chest or wear an American flag pin while campaigning.  Those images are ingrained in the minds of millions who love this country and remain offended at the obvious slight.  If he didn’t know, he should have.  And that, boys ‘n girls is precisely the point!

Obama plainly has divided loyalties which he cannot divorce himself.  This is an observation not a criticism. Obama didn’t grow up as an American. Obama was born a British citizen, his mother too young to confer her American citizenship at the time of his birth.  His Kenyon father was a Muslim.  When he was 7 he moved to Indonesia with his mother and step-father, Lolo Soetoro.  His formative years were spent in Indonesia surrounded by Islam and its culture instead of taking part in Fourth of July in the summer, or reading about Plymouth Rock and our country’s beginning in school, running a lemonade stand, or just being an American kid eating Coco Puffs. How can anyone understand the customs and mores of a culture they were not part of until later in life?

Why wouldn’t Obama have divided loyalties? I am hard pressed to see how anyone with his background wouldn’t also have divided loyalties.

There can be no better example of why the Founding Father’s specified that the President of this country should be a Natural Born Citizen,(born of two U.S. citizens on American soil or on a U.S. territory) than Obama himself.  Their concern that a person with divided loyalties could not govern this country without compromising the safety and security of its citizens remains real.

He can recite the Muslim call to prayer perfectly yet confuses words from the Declaration of Independence with the Constitution during a news conference!

The tragedy of Obama’s faux presidency is it need never have happened if the Constitution had been adhered to instead of purposely being ignored.  The legal community was of immense help. There are  many talking heads, politicians, and lawyers who are on record …  who detest and despise Natural Born Citizen clause of the Constitution.  They view an Obama presidency as a tool to end run  the NBC clause.  A faux Obama will, at the very least, establish a precedent for future elections. Their silence and obfuscation of the facts helped cement this travesty.

This behavior was a precursor to the “deemed passed” tactics now in play to pass the hated Obama Care legislation.  And people are surprised?  Why?

Sadly we have a group of progressive/liberal elitists in government and in the MSM who care more about their political agenda than the American people and the continued success of this country.

And so we watch a man and his fake presidency doomed to failure from the beginning.  What we are watching is a disaster in slow motion built on lies, dreams, and phony promises. We’re watching this man ill suited for the Presidency, as he continues down a road that (once all the facts are finally revealed) history will recoil from and record with disdain.


Pelosi wants to pass Obama Care legislation by deeming it so.

This is akin to deeming Obama is a natural born citizen.  It seems the Dems like to use the word deem in place of ignore.  Nancy and her pals of socialist/progressive thugs ignored the Constitution to get Obama elected, so what’s the big deal about a piece of legislation?  Kick it to the curb … after all, as our Dear Leader has opined in the past, “It’s a flawed document!”   Who cares, right?  The tactic is unconstitutional under Article 1, Section 7 and likely to be ruled so by the Supreme Court … so what!

So, how does Pelosi pull off this trick?  It’ NY Representative … Louise Slaughter (ironic name for someone intent on destroying the Constitution, don’t ya think?) to the rescue with a way to pass a bill that over the 65% of the country does not want.  It’s called let’s pretend we voted on it or the Slaughter Solution.

Democratic leader Rep. Chris Van Hollen admitted today on FOX News Sunday that democrats will use the unconstitutional “Slaughter Rule” to ram their pro-abortion nationalized health care bill through Congress. Democrats announced this tactic last week. They will pass the bill without voting on it. They will take over one-sixth of the US economy without even voting on it.

Now why do you need to know who Dr. Edwin Vieira is?  Here’s why.

Dr. Vieira who holds four degrees from Harvard: A.B. (Harvard College), A.M. and Ph.D. (Harvard Graduate School of Arts and Sciences), and J.D. (Harvard Law School) stated last year before the election, that legislation passed under a fraudulently elected President is null and void.   This is a legal scholar of renown, not a wing-nut so there’s no need to duck for cover.

To date, not a single person in the MSM has taken on Dr. Vieira about the consequences of a fraudulent President (in this case Obama) and legislation passed while in office. Not a single talking head (not Beck, O’Reilly, Matthews, Olbermann, Tobin, Turley, etc, etc, etc,) has had the balls to discuss the Obama/McCain/ natural born citizen clause in the Constitution in an open and honest way.

If Obama, born a British citizen (because his father was a British citizen and his mother was too young to confer her U.S. citizenship status to her son)  cannot produce documents proving that both parents were U.S. citizens at the time of his birth (naturalized is not natural born) and that he was born in the United States or on U.S. territory, he’s never been legally President.  TARP, the “stimulus “bills, Obama Care …. all are moot!

For the record, the last time Congress addressed the Natural Born Citizen clause in an open and honest way was in 2000.  Read H.J.Res. 88 here.

The last time the MSM talked or wrote the the NBC clause was in 2004, before Obama ran for the office of POTUS.


The question is simple, one I have repeatedly asked since August of 2008.

Where in the Constitution does it state that a person who is born a dual citizen at the time of birth is allowed to run for the office of President of the United States?

Answer. Nowhere.

Dual citizens are not allowed to hold the highest office in the land.  The truth is that Obama has never been eligible to be POTUS.

He knows that, the MSM (including FOX) knows that, and so too a lengthy list of attorneys, talking heads, and legal scholars (Tobin, Turley, Dean et al) who wrap themselves in the Constitution when it suits their purposes.  Obama suited their purposes.   This group (which included Bill and Hillary haters) kicked the Constitution to the curb so they could move forward with their progressive agenda for changing America.

While questions revolving around his birthplace continue to swirl, it is his British/ dual citizenship at the time of his birth that automatically disqualified him from ever holding the highest office in the land, regardless of his having been born in Hawaii or Kenya.

All the concentration on Obama’s long form birth certificate has proved to be a handy bludgeoning tool used by the MSM.  Yell “Birther” and see how many politicians are willing to stand their ground.

For a moment let me lend some credibility to people who question Obama’s eligibility and remind you that when Hillary was running that Bill Clinton mentioned Obama’s eligibility, some would say, making him the First Birther!

Now comes the latest politician willing to talk about Obama’s eligibility … for a short time anyway until, predictably,  the Birther charge was hurled at Virginia Attorney General Cuccinellia.  The timing is very interesting because Obamacare is also front and center.

Just a reminder, if we are correct and Obama has always been ineligible to hold office then every piece of legislation, including TARP and the hated Health Care bill Team Obama is determined to ram down America’s throat, would be null … void of legal force!

This despised 3,000 page monstrosity of payoffs and kick-backs masquerading as legislation could not be law.  Remember this point as you look at this video.

Here’s another really good question.  If Pelosi, Reid, and the Democrats are determined to use any means possible to pass Obamacare, despite the fact that most of the citizens of this country DO NOT WANT THIS BILL TO PASS, how long do you think it will be before an Attorney General in one of the 50 states decides to challenge the bill as being unconstitutional on the grounds that Obama, born a British/dual citizen is not legitimately President?


I know I’ve been gone for several weeks … unable to write because of the pressures of business and survival in a economic atmosphere designed for only the hardiest of individuals … however, is this the best Team Obama can come up with?  The Coffee Party? coffee stainOh, pa leese!  Geez … there’s hokey and then there’s really hokey!

Let me see, if I have it right, a new “grass roots” movement is arising in response to the wildly successful Tea Party Movement, a genuine grass roots movement borne out of the frustration of watching a faux President and his Democratic/socialist lap dogs in a the government gone wild … impervious to the wishes of the populace.

The problem with anything obviously contrived is that it is so easily identified.  Metaphorically speaking it is akin to a pimple at the end of a big honker of a nose.  It appears that in addition to lacking a single good idea as to how to get the economy going or  how to lead and govern, this group of pea brains also lacks genuine creativity.  I can hear the brain storming  (I know that’s an oxymoron) now, ” ya well, if they can call themselves Tea Party members we can be Coffee Party members … tea’s a drink, coffee’s a drink, right? It’s a natural!”  No Mensa members here.

Hey, any of you whiz kids ever hear of the Boston Tea Party?  No?  Thought as much.  Here’s something else that’s no surprise; unlike the genuine article the Tea Party Movement, CNN, the Washington Post, and HuffPo all have put a positive spin on the new Coffee Party (ahem, would that be Starbucks, Maxwell House, Dunkin Donuts perhaps) Movement.  Unlike the derisive rhetoric used to describe any participant of the Tea Parties, the new Coffee Party participants are reasoned, reasonable folk who just want to get along (everybody sing Kumbaya, my Lord, Kumbaya)  … with a political Rodney King mind set as it were.

FYI, here’s a copy of their mission statement

MISSION: The Coffee Party Movement gives voice to Americans who want to see cooperation in government. We recognize that the federal government is not the enemy of the people, but the expression of our collective will (emphasis mine), and that we must participate in the democratic process in order to address the challenges that we face as Americans. As voters and grassroots volunteers, we will support leaders who work toward positive solutions, and hold accountable those who obstruct them.

Bless their collective, no dodge ball playing, everybody gets a trophy,  little hearts as they look for solutions while ignoring the Constitution.  One last thought.  Phony movements are like phony laughs  … they are empty, devoid of real sustainable emotion … and all the coffee in the world won’t change that!


WTC 7  or World Trade Center building #7 collapsed many hours after the Twin Towers were felled by the attack on 9/11.  I wrote about WTC 7 several months ago primarily because of the questions surrounding its mysterious collapse  … no strike that … make it demolition.

For me, this is simple … buildings don’t fall by themselves, yet WTC #7 seems to have done just that.

I know there are many 9/11 conspiracy theorists who believe that the Government was somehow involved. I can’t go there … it is an act so heinous, incomprehensible that people in our government could be involved.  However, Building 7 is different.  Ten minutes of investigation will show you that.

The Washingston Times is reporting the following:

A lingering technical question about the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks still haunts some, and it has political implications: How did 200,000 tons of steel disintegrate and drop in 11 seconds? A thousand architects and engineers want to know, and are calling on Congress to order a new investigation into the destruction of the Twin Towers and Building 7 at the World Trade Center.

“In order to bring down this kind of mass in such a short period of time, the material must have been artificially, exploded outwards,” says Richard Gage, a San Francisco architect and founder of the nonprofit Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

Mr. Gage, who is a member of the American Institute of Architects, managed to persuade more than 1,000 of his peers to sign a new petition requesting a formal inquiry.

“The official Federal Emergency Management [Agency] and National Institute of Standards and Technology reports provide insufficient, contradictory and fraudulent accounts of the circumstances of the towers’ destruction. We are therefore calling for a grand jury investigation of NIST officials,” Mr. Gage adds.

The technical issues surrounding the collapse of the towers has prompted years of debate, rebuttal and ridicule.

He is particularly disturbed by Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper, which was not hit by an aircraft, yet came down in “pure free-fall acceleration. He also says that more than 100 first-responders reported explosions and flashes as the towers were falling and cited evidence of “multi-ton steel sections ejected laterally 600 ft. at 60 mph” and the “mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete & metal decking.”

The truth is, I no longer believe anyone  in a position of power has our best interests at heart … sure as hell not the MSM … and we can forget just about everyone in Washington.  So I continue to ask, “what really happened to WTC #7?”

This is a question well worth investigation.


Some things just speak for themselves.  This is posted with little comment.  Hat tip to Flopping Aces.  The Anointed One, our faux executive in chief, could not contain himself … 16 lies in 7 minutes! Phew!

Wonder if that’s a new record?


Well, well, well … the New York Times is discovering the importance of the Tea Party Movement, or so it was pronounced this morning on Morning Joe.

Let’s see, what did it take to get the Gray Lady to move her arse?  Was it the mass march on Washington this past September?   It is estimated that over 1 million people went to Washington to voice their concerns about health care and taxes. No, no, no!

Maybe it was town hall meetings where thousands of angry constituents across the country confronted their elected Washington officials. No, no, no!

Ok then, when Democrat John Corzine lost the governor’s race in New Jersey to a Republican challenger, or when Virginia also elected a Republican governor.  That had an impact didn’t it? Nope, that didn’t do it either.

Well boys ‘n girls we all know how the world changed on Tuesday with the election of Republican Scott Brown to the Senate seat that Teddy Kennedy held for 40 years.  This finally caught the Times attention.

Don’t expect fair coverage, this is after all, a bastion of progressive insanity and foolishness … an Obama stink tank.  I wouldn’t hold my breathe wondering if the pejorative “teabagger” finds it’s way into article either.  Betcha $50 bucks it does!

So look for an analysis that bears little resemblance to the truth … look for something shallow and superficial … looks for a hit job!

Visit for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Jon Stewart finally nails Olbermann … It’s about time!

I don’t watch Jon Stewart as much as I used to.

There was a time when watching the Daily Show was a necessity. Lately, not so much. During presidential campaign he remained someone whose wit could be counted on to highlight the foolish acts of hypocrites in both parties. He skewered both sides … until Obama was elected.

Then slowly but surely he was no different than the suck-ups and sycophants over at MSNBC and elsewhere. I’ve been tempted to write about how I remembered Stewart when he was funny … and then this. He nailed Olbermann the other night … and it’s about time!

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
Special Comment – Keith Olbermann’s Name-Calling
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Political Humor Health Care Crisis

For more on Olbermann read here and here.


I’ve been watching the Coakley/Brown  race for Teddy Kennedy’s the People’s Senate seat in Massachusetts with amusement and fascination.

The last few days have shown the world that there is no gutter the desperate Dems won’t get into, no evil or despicable act they will pass on, no lie too big for the Dems and team Obama.  Character assassination?  No problemo!   So what if Brown didn’t really vote to prevent women from getting rape kits!  The pictures looked good didn’t they? Besides isn’t this the same foolproof BS that got the Constitutionally ineligible fraud elected President?

Ya, well I guess you really can fool some of the people all the time, but not this time Sparky!  The people are feed up with back room deals, all the overspending and under-performing. They are tired of the excuses, the phony rhetoric, the bailouts, the 37 Czars, the lack of transparency, and being taken for granted.

CNN is reporting that the White House is predicting a Coakley loss.

Oh, boo hoo! But even better is this, Hot Air is reporting that when the Big O arrived at his venue to speak barely 1,500 people were there … not counting the hecklers … yes, I said hecklers!

Regardless of the motivation, the result speaks for itself. While Scott Brown drew at least 3,000 for his big rally this afternoon, Obama struggled to fill his venue:

But Obama and a parade of Democrats who appeared on stage before a crowd a local fire official put at 1,100 at Northeastern University’s modest gymnasium spent much of their time trying to explain to the audience, and to themselves, how they had lost their grip on the public “anger” – a word that has replaced “hope” as the emotion Democrats seek to channel.

He couldn’t fill a hall for Deval Patrick in October, either. If Coakley was looking for a game-changer, she’s going to be disappointed.

Update: The Boston Globe puts Obama’s rally at 1500 and Brown’s at 2200 (in the main room), but makes the point that the President got overshadowed by the state Senator!

And if you think things can’t get worse, you’d be wrong. Teddy Kennedy’s home town paper, the Cape Cod Times has just endorsed Scott Brown.

In his last re-election to the state Senate in 2008, Brown won by a 59-41 percent margin. Part of his success comes from his willingness to work with Democrats on important issues.

“I would not have been overwhelmingly re-elected if I didn’t know how to work across party lines,” Brown said in the primary. “If the Democrats have a good idea, I’d be happy to vote with them.”

Brown is exactly what Washington needs — someone who will vote his conscience rather than spew party rhetoric.

The notion of change as an important ingredient here cannot be underestimated, not because the Democrats are necessarily on the wrong path, but because good government is enhanced by two viable parties.

In the special Senate election on Tuesday, we recommend Scott Brown.


If you have been following the special election race in Massachusetts you are aware of the Martha (of course that Senate seat is mine) Coakley and Scott (no, it’s the people’s seat) Brown battle that is going on.

Ole Martha baby was supposed to be a shoe-in to take over Teddy Kennedy’s Senate seat, she would be the 60th vote to help pass that monstrosity of a pork laden bill, masquerading as healthcare reform.  Obama and the Dimocrats would have their “victory” and Hallelujah all would be right in the world of liberal/progressive droids masquerading as legislators in the Congress of these United States.

Well, the funny thing is, no one told Scott Brown that, nor were the citizens of Massachusetts consulted.  See, it  was a foregone conclusion, in the same manner as Caroline Kennedy’s assumptive notion that she should get the Senate seat in New York  when Hillary left.

I first became aware of Brown when Texas Darlin came out of retirement and her blog went live again. (Here’s were a real Hallelujah is in order!) One need listen to Brown for a few moments to know he is the real deal as witnessed in the recent Brown/Coakley debate.  They are nearly tied in the race and some people think Brown will whip Coakley.  There’s a lot at stake here for the Obama White House, Pelosi, and Reid!

Why should citizen journalists be heading to Massachusetts?  Two reasons.

  1. Because as Michelle Malkin and others are reporting, the thugs and thugettes from SEIU are being marshalled to go to Massachusetts to help in the election. You remember SEIU don’t you … the ones that roughed up that black conservative in August of ’09 simply for passing flags out!
  2. If you think the Obama/Holder “Justice” Department will do anything if the SEIU thugs pull a Black Panthers move on election day, I’ve got a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you.  Apparently voter intimidation is OK if you are black and not so much if you’re white or don’t hold the beliefs of the Obamobots!  Holder let them off … shameful!  But at least you know who the enemy is!

Purple Army to Coakley’s rescue: SEIU sends $685,000 more; And speaking of thugs…

By Michelle Malkin  •  January 12, 2010 10:27 PM

I told you on New Year’s weekend and again last week that the SEIU was “pulling out all the stops” for Mass. Attorney General and Democrat Senate candidate Martha Coakley.

Now, on top of all the manpower that the Big Labor army of Purple Shirts has lent her, plus the group’s primary endorsement, and the $214,000 they sent her for radio ad buys last fall, the SEIU is preparing to burn through another $685,000 in rank-and-file union members’ dues for the attorney general.

Want more?  Listen to this audio clip, (H/T No Quarter).  The clip is about 37 minutes long.  If you want to hear John Fund immediately, he’s about ten minutes into the segment.

For more on the rumor about SEIU, and other delicious details, check out the MP3 of John Batchelor’s information-rich interview of John Fund on January 12th. This interview is so great that I was tempted to try to transcribe it for you. But just listen. The first part of the MP3 is about Haiti, but keep listening, or fast-forward to the spot shown in the image below.: