Category Archives: Sarah Palin

Joe McGinniss’ Sarah Palin Book Shows What a Sick Dude He Is!

Even some liberals say the McGinniss Sarah Palin book scrapes the bottom of the barrel of indecency by showcasing undocumented allegations from weak anonymous sources. Lloyd Marcus

Remember years ago we used to hear a lot about penis envy? It was a pseudo clever term used to describe women who supposedly behaved in a rude, obnoxious manner because of their jealousy, having been deprived a penis when they were born.

Today we need to scratch penis envy and make it Palin Envy. Make no mistake part of the reason the Obama butt kissing Progressives hate Palin is because she is everything they aren’t. These are angry, jealous, small minded people that are obsessed with her; ergo the Palin Envy.

Why the "Progressives" hate Sarah Palin

She’s happy. has a life filled with children, a  husband and life partner that is equal parts testosterone and loving family man. She is accomplished, loves her God, and her country.

In their poor,  pathetic, empty little lives they run around preening themselves in hypocrisy, telling themselves how superior they are to middle America and all those who believe in American exceptionalism, God, the Constitution, and crave FREEDOM from the government’s interference in our lives.

Almost always these sufferers of Palin Envy have sour looks on their faces as they complain about Palin’s “short comings” and anything that doesn’t fit their narrative of socialist America.

<object width=”420″ height=”245″ id=”msnbc4bef12″ classid=”clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000″ codebase=”,0,0,0″><param name=”movie” value=”″ /><param name=”FlashVars” value=”launch=44560126&amp;width=420&amp;height=245″ /><param name=”allowScriptAccess” value=”always” /><param name=”allowFullScreen” value=”true” /><param name=”wmode” value=”transparent” /><embed name=”msnbc4bef12″ src=”″ width=”420″ height=”245″ FlashVars=”launch=44560126&amp;width=420&amp;height=245″ allowscriptaccess=”always” allowFullScreen=”true” wmode=”transparent” type=”application/x-shockwave-flash” pluginspage=””></embed></object><p style=”font-size:11px; font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color: #999; margin-top: 5px; background: transparent; text-align: center; width: 420px;”>Visit for <a style=”text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;” href=””>breaking news</a>, <a href=”″ style=”text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;”>world news</a>, and <a href=”″ style=”text-decoration:none !important; border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; font-weight:normal !important; height: 13px; color:#5799DB !important;”>news about the economy</a></p>

All of which brings us to the sicko Joe McGinniss and his book, “The Rogue: Searching for the Real Sarah Palin.” Let’s start by saying that this book is so vile, so scurrilous and turgid with rumors that even the New York Times, Bill Maher, and Keith Olbermann are defending Palin (check and see if hell just froze over) and are on the record saying McGinniss has crossed a line! Looks to me like ole Joe is clearly suffering from Palin Envy.

What did Todd Palin think of McGinniss’ slanderous book?

“This is a man who has been relentlessly stalking my family to the point of moving in right next door to us to harass us and spy on us to satisfy his creepy obsession with my wife,”

If you are looking for something insightful and new about Sarah Palin, forget it. You won’t find anything in it McGinniss book except caustic rumors designed to hurt the Palins.

Here’s a book with pages that can best be used to line canary cages. McGinniss is yet another D-Lister like  Kathy Griffin, Tina Fey, and Katie Couric who have linked themselves to Sarah Palin and her family as a way to prolong their mediocre careers! They are all pathetic with needy, second rate minds.

Watch this disgusting hit piece run on The Today Show masquerading as “news” and ask yourself why did they even bother?


It’s a sad day indeed. The NY Times/Washington Post mining for dirt in Palin’s e-mails has turned into a disaster, a joke on them!

Actually, this hasn’t been a very good week for the Lame Stream Media. Maybe we should file these stories under Palin gets the last laugh!

First, they could not stop themselves when they thought Sarah Palin had misspoken about Paul Revere. In her statement about Revere she noted that he had warned the British. It was like a shot had been fired. Ho, ho, ho, hee, hee, hee the LSM chuckled, “Palin’s a dummy!”

All that laughter stopped once NPR reported, Palin might be right after all!  Even the LA Times was forced to admit, yes indeed Revere did warn the British (not to challenge a roused and armed populace).

There everyone was with baked beans (instead of eggs) all over their faces after the Paul Revere fiasco when reports that Alaska was finally releasing 24,000 of Palin’s e-mails came to light. All was not lost. There was still time to nail Palin.

And then someone within the LSM collective had a brilliant idea, TA DA, why not get some of the worst Progressive Palin haters to help us “review” all those e-mails? Certainly there have to be loads of dirt we can use to put that pesky Sarah in her place! “She deserves a good kneecapping after finding out the British really were warned by Revere,” said one of the NY Times mental giants, wiping the last of the dried explosion of baked beans from his shirt.

Well, here’s where it gets really funny. Remember those bungling burglars in Home Alone always having something blow up in their faces?  Well. this blew up in the faces of the Obama Compliant Media big time.

Did they find the secrets they were looking for? I’m afraid not. Just listen to CNN (!) describe Governor Sarah Palin.

So what the LSM has found is Sarah was a hard working Governor…image that!  There was nothing about Troopergate or Todd as the shadow governor, although many are still looking for the tiniest bit of  scandal  She didn’t take shots at the media, in fact, many times she tried to deflect any criticism her staff might get.

As Conservatives 4Palin states, the decision to go after Palin through her e-mails has turned into a “surreal colonoscopy that is backfiring”.  Much to the media’s chagrin, the emails show a serious and highly effective executive who was in full control of her administration. She was was a very engaged and highly effective Governor even Politico is acknowledging.



We have definitely found ourselves on the other side of the looking glass. The New York Times and the Washington Post, aka the Tweedledum and Tweedledee of the journalism, have issued nearly identical press releases asking for 100 people to help them “analyze” the 24,000 Palin e-mails that Alaska will be releasing on Friday.

What do you mean we're not journalists?

It is an act of yellow journalism unparalleled in the 21st century.  These tabloid rags are mining for dirt on a woman who isn’t running for president and isn’t even a candidate for office.

The newspaper that the great Kathrine Graham once headed has made the National Enquirer look good. Her newspaper went after President Nixon and oversaw the Watergate coverage that eventually to his resignation.

Fast forward to today, where we have a fraud with multiple social security numbers sitting in the White House.  Instead of searching for the truth about Obama and his eligibility, his wholesale destruction of the economy, bringing us into a third war in Libya, these papers are instead focused on their Palin Derangement Syndrome. This is sad and disgusting; and they wonder why readership is down!

This is from the Washed-Up Post:

Over 24,000 e-mail messages to and from former Alaska governor Sarah Palin during her tenure as Alaska’s governor will be released Friday. That’s a lot of e-mail for us to review so we’re looking for some help from Fix readers to analyze, contextualize, and research those e-mails right alongside Post reporters over the days following the release.

We are limiting this to just 100 spots for people who will work collaboratively in small teams to surface the most important information from the e-mails. Participants can join from anywhere with a computer and an Internet connection.

If you need inspiration before getting started, take a look at what to expect from the e-mail drop. For micro-updates as tomorrow unfolds, check out our new Twitter feed.

This is from the NY Times:

On Friday, the State of Alaska will release more than 24,000 of Sarah Palin’s e-mails covering much of her tenure as governor of Alaska. Times reporters will be in Juneau, the state capital, to begin the process of reviewing the e-mails, which we will be posting on starting on Friday afternoon.

We’re asking readers to help us identify interesting and newsworthy e-mails, people and events that we may want to highlight. Interested users can fill out a simple form to describe the nature of the e-mail, and provide a name and e-mail address so we’ll know who should get the credit. Join us here on Friday afternoon and into the weekend to participate.

Now here’s the best part. Go to the comments of both papers and read what people are saying. Many, many of the comments are negative.  There are some really good ones that pull no punches.  Here are a few examples before they are scrubbed.

From the WaPo:

That sucking sound you hear is WaPo slipping down below the National Enquirer in quality and integrity.

That cracking sound in the background is the last remnant of the Washington Post’s integrity falling to the ground.

wow! not since the 1930s in Nazi Germany has there been such evidence of mass psychosis ..

One-Think, One-Speak partisan lap-dogs.

You’d think this was the release of the Pentagon Papers.

And these are from the Times:

Jesus, is this what it’s come to? E-lynch mobs combing through data to use to as “gotcha” material?

I don’t remember the NY Times asking the public to go through then Senator Obama’s emails to find newsworthy materials…

Astonishing to see how low the lamestream (aka state run) media have sunk. This is nothing more than juvenile junior high clique style gossip and defamation of character. It is hilarious to watch you all jump out of your skin when Sarah says, “BOO!”
No honor or pride left in the journalism business, eh? The professionalism went a long time ago.

Both the Times and the Washington Post are sending out identical notices of recruitment!! What is this journalistic ploy? How many staffers do you plan to let go to cover this assignment with “just plain folks”? Well, I guess the Progressive “investigators” can do as well. Does Obama get to add the “volunteers” to his job creation tally?

This is pathetic and quite creepy

That last quote sums it all up, doesn’t it?



No wonder the Progressives, Obama, and the LSM hate Sarah Palin. Every time Palin is excoriated about something in the lame stream media you can bet she’s right.

It has become a dead give away. The harder the likes of Matthews, Couric, Cooper, and the MSM “gang” push, punish, and attempt to destroy Palin and her character the greater the chances you can bet she’s nailed it.

Take the death panels for instance…first you see them and you don’t. In the health care bill (67% of America hates and doesn’t want) one moment they are there and then presto/chango they’re gone! Ah, but not for long!

In typical Obama fashion, if they can’t get something accomplished through legal channels (say like legislation) then side step Congress and ignore the will of the people.

Just dictate through fiat and regulations and the death panels are back!

This is from the Liberty & Life Pac in a recent email update.

Kathleen Sebelius, head of the Department of Health & Human Services, has ruled that effective January 1, 2011, all Medicare & Medicaid doctors will be paid to provide “end of life” counseling to the elderly and/or those younger and poorer patients deemed “infirm” to help them decide if life is still worth living. All this will be provided yearly, as part of Obama’s new annual, creepily-euphemistically entitled “wellness” checkup.

And Sebelius’ supporters are trying to keep the implementation a secret! Rep. Earl Blumenauer, (D-OR), recently sent supporters of the new rule an e-mail warning them “not to broadcast this accomplishment (!) out to any of your lists, even if they are supporters because e-mails can too easily be forwarded.”

Ms. Sebelius has apparently declared herself dictator and overthrown not only the will of the people, but also that of Congress, issuing secret, death-dealing orders behind closed doors. The ObamaCare bill originally contained provisions for the much derided “Death Panels” designed to persuade, pressure and coerce the elderly and infirm into making life or death decisions only every five years.

Now add this to what Ron Panzer, founder of Hospice Patients Alliance, has to say about the government’s directives for hospice care. This looks like a perfect storm to me.

U.S. government rules, which supposedly protect patient privacy, have created a climate of fear among medical personnel to prevent them from reporting deliberate killing of hospice patients.

Panzer has received masses of complaints and pleas for help from patients and their families. The institutions are not fulfilling the gentler and useful function of hospice to care for the incurable and terminal patient. He says that tens of thousands of patients who are not otherwise “near death” are being killed in private institutions, to decrease their costs and increase profits, while the government “saves money” by not having to contribute to patients’ care in hospitals. Panzer warns that the rationing designed into Obamacare will greatly intensify the problem.

I am in no position to investigate what Panzer is alleging, however, the little digging I have done thus far leads me to believe his statements are true. If we had any real investigative journalism left, this is a one hell of a story to pursue.

Any investigative journalists out there, not sucking on Obama Kool-Aid?


I am a professional woman … tagged as a “woman’s libber” year’s ago, I never liked the National Organization for Women. I always felt they denigrated women who decided to have children or chose to put their family ahead of their careers.

When Hillary Clinton was being torn apart by the MSM, NOW remained silent.  When Sarah Palin‘s family was being decimated and her newly born special needs baby Trig was mocked in the most vile ways NOW remained silent.

NOW finds the word whore offensive, offended when Beck called Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.) a “high-class prostitute” on his radio show.

Ah, when that same word was used by the Brown campaign to describe Meg Whitman … nothing but the sounds of silence!

Yesterday, NOW  finally exposed the true nature of the organization with it’s endorsement of Jerry Brown, a man whose campaign had no problem calling Meg Whitman, the first woman to possibly hold the office of Governor of California, a whore. NOW is an abortion rights group … all the other stuff (equal rights for women etc.) was fluff.

I don’t care what a woman’s political party is, she has a right to her views.  When people start throwing pejorative, vicious slurs at a woman for any reason, I have zero tolerance for this kind of crap!

In my book, if you call one woman a whore you are calling all women whores. If you remain silent you are as guilty as the abuser. Calling any woman a whore is verbal abuse … period!

We all know the primary meaning of whore, but there is a secondary meaning that fits here, that being venal or unscrupulous NOW and Governor Moonbeam are wedded together … whores forever.

Governor Moonbeam, who once said, “If it babbles and its eyeballs are glazed it probably comes from California”, has no problem with his staff calling his opponent Meg Whitman a whore … no outrage, no apology, no nothing!

Earlier this year he also compared Ms. Whitman’s advertising blitz to Hitler’s propaganda minister, Joseph Goebbels.

While I’m at it, let us not forget the jab Brown took at Bill Clinton, raking up images of the past with Monica Lewinsky.

Brown’s a classless jerk and a bore!

The Whitman campaign responded by saying:

“Meg Whitman is a pro-choice woman who was ranked among the world’s most accomplished women in business,” said Whitman campaign manager Jillian Hasner. “She’s now running to become the first woman governor in California’s history, and on the same day that it’s reported Jerry Brown’s campaign called her a ‘whore,’ the National Organization [for] Women endorses him.

It’s official: NOW is a partisan organization.”

The following is a comment from Sophia 5 at the Daily Beast (an unfortunate name for website managed by a woman):

Of course NOW is about Abortions.  Isn’t ironic, how some women who support abortion rights, just might be the same women who GO NUTS, SCREAMING and HOLLERING over wolf hunts.

Lets see . . . Fetus . . . or . . . Wolf . . . which one should have more rights ?

More about Brown here.


Here are the statistics.  According to Palin’s endorsement record is impressive. Of the 36 candidates facing contested primaries that she has endorsed, 25 have won. That’s a win ratio of just under 70%. Opps, looks like the grass roots Tea Party movement is the real deal!

Gov. Sarah Palin in Dover, NH Sarah Palin, the tough, astute, savvy politician that the MSM and their Democratic/Progressive  pals are fond of mocking and portraying as a dullard is whipping the pants off the Washington establishment.

Portraying Palin, the Tea Party, and conservatives of every persuasion as racists (that one’s getting old isn’t it?) spoilers, angry, and demented has come with a price … defeat at the ballot box!  Yes!

It has been grand fun listening to the pundits on MSNBC and CNN, and the likes of Bill Maher and the hideous Michael (can I squeeze another cheeseburger into my mouth) Moore continue to rant and wring their hands as they get the Tea Party movement wrong! They still don’t get it!  I’m guessing that’s because they have no concept of what it means to act on principle and hold adherence to the law as an American ideal.

They continue to rant:

that the Tea Party is leaderless and will never impact the country (leaderless in vague sort of way, yes, but the TP impact is transformative).  The flip side of that coin is that Sarah Palin (and Rush, and Shawn, and Glenn)  all lead the Tea Party (definitely wrong) and are in bed with the GOP (wrong, again as the O’Donnell win in Delaware demonstrates).  The TP hates Obama (wrong, his policies not the man).  Those in the multitude of Tea Party organizations across the country don’t understand the Constitution (Really?), they are afraid of Mexicans (no, we just want our laws enforced and our borders protected).

And, we must not forget the standard delegitimizations;  Palin, conservatives, Tea Party members, and all those who oppose Obamacare, TARP, and the radical agenda of the Democratic Progressives are white, uneducated, gun loving, frightened, confused, and myopic … incapable of seeing the greatness of Socialism and the New World Order.

The real shock though has come from Karl Rove and the other sore losers in the establishment GOP in Delaware, Alaska, and elsewhere in the country.  Christine O’Donnell won in Delaware because her opponent voted for TARP and increasing the deficit, Cap ‘n Trade, and would not support the repeal of Obamacare.   O’Donnell’s opponent, Mike Castle, was worse than a RINO (Republican in Name Only)!

And it gets better.  Harry Reid recently called Chris Coons avowed Marxist and O’Donnell’s opponent in November, his pet! God, gag me with a spoon! (Where is that barf bag?)

What does all of this mean?  Well, here’s a heads up for those currently in power  (Republicans and Democrats alike) who continue to disregard the obvious.

The American people have found their voice.  Our expressed wishes for the direction of the country will no longer be diminished, disrespected, and ignored.  In the very same way the MSM and the liberals and Progressives on cable have made themselves and their companies irrelevant, so too are the two controlling political parties in the country racing to make themselves irrelevant.  Christine O’Donnell’s win wasn’t a fluke … her win is the future!

Now, the question is will the former power brokers in the Democratic and Republican parties  go the way of the horse and buggy!


Bill Maher:  a truly wonderful man.At one time Bill Maher was a very funny fellow, but as time has passed, he has turned into a bitter,vulgar, strident Obama pimp. No longer hip or insightful, he’s just rude and crude.

As more and more people have rejected his vision of religion (remember Religulous … a movie fewer people than the 12 Apostles saw?) and other topics near and dear to the hearts of progressives everywhere, his speech and “vision” of America have become more and more warped and radical.

In his attempts to denigrate the Tea Party, Sarah Palin, Republicans, Conservatives, pro-life advocates, and any and all who show the least little bit of support for faux President Obama, he ends up making a ass of himself. He clearly hates everyone who does not share his views, some would say he hates himself, but that’s a topic for another day.

This weekend on his March 26th show he showed us what true violence is here.

One writer, when talking about Maher’s failed movie on religion said this,” his positive admonitions are lost in the maelstrom of cheap-shots, deliberate over-simplification, pontification, and the same narrow-minded claim to certainty for which Maher so angrily excoriates religious folk.”

This statement is equally applicable to his position that we “the unwashed and uneducated” need to be dragged kicking and screaming into his vision of America’s healthcare future.


On average, women give at least three reasons for choosing abortion: three-fourths say that having a baby would interfere with work, school, or other responsibilities; about two-thirds say they cannot afford a child; and half say they do not want to be a single parent or are having problems with their husband or partner. For more statistics read here

This thought has gripped me for the last several days.  Here in the midst of one of Christianity’s most holy holiday seasons, this question will not leave my consciousness.

Forget for a moment that the time of year Jesus was born was more likely March or April (shepherds tend their flocks at night during the spring and keep them sheltered inside during the winter months) or the timing and relationship of our celebration of His birth which just happens to coincide with the Winter Solstice and pagan celebrations.  If one believes in His birth and resurrection, taken in the context of the right to choose verses the right to life movements, this question resonates.Mary & Jesus Stained Glass

I found it to be particularly poignant given the Christmas Eve vote on heath care that the Democrats rammed through, despite the fact that most Americans hate the bill and do not want the government to control heath care.

This is a bill that contains exclusions for 13 states, goodies for a host of legislators lacking even a speck of integrity.  There was Senator Reid celebrating … joyous at the “gift” we were just handed from a group of whores that calls corruption compromise and that continues to insist that this is way “things are done in Washington”… justification for legislation that is indefensible by any measure.

Lurking out there is abortion funding and how the Congressional sleezoids will try to insert it in the final bill.  Progressives & radical Democrats are adamant … support for abortions must be funded with our tax dollars; which brings me back to Mary and her child Jesus.

What if Mary’s choice was to abort her son?  After all what could be more inconvenient for a young 14 or 15 year old Jewish girl than becoming pregnant out of wedlock in Jewish society of the 1st century?  She could have been stoned to death for this pregnancy … a fate that is still melded out in certain societies in the 21st Century.

Absent rape or incest, if a couple decides to have unprotected sex (which is their choice knowing full well that a baby could be the end result), why should the life that has been created be tossed aside?  If one believes that all life is precious, how does one reconcile abortion and the ultimate destruction of new life?   Choices, good or bad ones, always have consequences and convenience shouldn’t be the deciding factor … unless your father is Barack Obama.

Obama is on record as saying if his one of his daughters became pregnant he wouldn’t want their “mistake to follow them the rest of their lives.  As an Illinois legislator Obama also had no problem with funding that allowed third trimester abortions!

This is the same mindset that allows life that can be disposed of so easily at the beginning can also be disposed of, if need be, at the end.  Just ration or withhold health care for those deemed to have already lived too long!

Aborting a few cells during the first weeks of a pregnancy is one thing.  Aborting a life capable of surviving outside the womb during the third trimester is nothing short of murder.  Don’t like the word murder?  Tough! Is there a prettier word for this barbaric act?  Tell me what politically correct word fits?

Yes, but doesn’t every woman have a right to choose what happens to her body?  The answer is yes … and no.  Might I opine that it has always been that way?  Life and death issues are rarely simple …  they are usually multi-layered and complex.

Ultimately there are only two kinds of acts in life, those that are selfish and those that are selfless.  Mary’s decision to bring her son into this world was selfless. Sarah Palin’s decision to have Trig knowing that he would be a Down’s syndrome baby was selfless, particularly since 90% of these babies are aborted after amino synthesis accurately predicts this condition.

Before any moron goes on a tirade and decides I am comparing Mary and Sarah Palin, don’t bother, I’m not.  The point of comparison was selfless acts not the women who chose to behave in this manner. Girls and women who find themselves with an unwanted pregnancy and yet choose to carry their babies to full term (sometimes defying the men in their lives who would sooner dispose of the life they helped create) are behaving in a selfless way.

Their choices may include adoption, sacrifice, and for some this means financial struggle … yet they choose the life of the child within over the destruction of a life that might grow and change the world.  These are women whose decisions are courageous, that fly in the face of pressures from the outside world that emphasizes that life is cheap, that scream, “You’ll get over it” … move on!

All of which brings us to today and the picture below which I first viewed on Afrocity in August.  It is a devastating indictment on those so called Progressives in Congress and elsewhere who preach that every woman has a right to terminate her pregnancy regardless of the consequences or circumstances.  If the life within is inconvenient, dispose of it post haste.  Rock on and let’s party!

Abortion is the ultimate act of selfness, particularly in a civilized society where there are so many other choices open to women besides purposefully snuffing out the life of an unborn.  The truth is, that many women never “get over it” and regret their decision to take (what seemed at the time) to be the easy way out.  Some are haunted by voices of their unborn.  Some are so self-absorbed that they never consider the hideous nature of their decision to choose lifestyle over life … to rid themselves of this “sudden inconvenience” like an old pair of shoes.

Do I want to return to the time of back room abortions with wire hangers, women dying because of infections brought about by unsanitary conditions or being butchered by an uncaring abortionist?  No, of course not, there are times when abortion is the only alternative.  Saving the life of a mother has to be of paramount consideration when medical complications arise.

But let’s be clear when we talk about a woman’s right to choose we don’t have to look very far to see where the consequences of this mindset can lead to and the public policies that it can foster. We already suffer other societies that use abortion as a form of population control … where the life of a male baby is valued over the life of a female baby so female babies are destroyed.  Need I go further?

In this most holy season let us rejoice in the miracle of the birth of Jesus, let us be thankful that this young Jewish girl, Mary, had the strength, grace, and selfless courage to trust that her son would grow strong and ultimately change the world. Let us pray that more women in this country choose the life of the unborn inside them over desecration & despair.


Sarah Palin recently stated that bringing up questions about Obama’s birth certificate are fair game and she’s right.  She’s also the only one in the country that could bring a lawsuit challenging Obama’s citizenship status  & eligibility for POTUS that the courts and the MSM could not ignore!

Why?  Because she, as a plaintiff, would have undeniable standing … meaning she has been DIRECTLY effected by Obama’s ineligibility to hold the office of POTUS.

To have standing one has to demonstrate injury (loss the the election to an ineligible candidate) and the fact that the defendant’s conduct (refusal to provide any documentation that BHO is a natural born citizen) was the reason for injury.

While the Obamabots have been quick to report that every suit brought to date has been dismissed, what they haven’t reported is the reason why.  Aside from jurisdictional and procedural issues , the primary reason for the dismissals has been because the courts have held that the plaintiffs in these suits did not have the standing necessary to move forward.

What the Obamabots have also refused to discuss is the fact the no case has reached a point where the merits of the Obama’s eligibility have been explored in open court.

I asked my first questions about Obama’s eligibility to hold the office of POTUS in summer of 2008.

The questions were simple enough. Can a person with dual citizenship be President (no) and how could Obama be a natural born citizen as required by Article II, Section1 of the Constitution if his father was a British subject? The answer is he cannot which also means, it doesn’t matter whether BHO was born in Kenya or Hawaii, his citizenship status at the time of his birth automatically disqualified him for POTUS.

At the time I asked these questions about Obama’s eligibility, I was naive enough to believe that the MSM would do their jobs, investigate the allegations, and bring the truth to the American people. At the time, I was also naive to believe that the DNC, that the 50 Secretaries of State, Constitutional lawyers, the Electoral College, and whole host of other players, including the courts, would also do their jobs.

Well, as anyone who has been following this story from the beginning knows, we were all wrong.

What we couldn’t know at the time was that people intent on bringing Obama into office were willing to go to any lengths, ready to do anything including committing fraud, knowingly falsifying records, using intimidation tactics, ridicule and violence. It has been reported that the suspicious death of one of the men who looked at Obama’s passport records early in ‘08 was to silence him and prevent him from ever being questioned.

What we couldn’t know at the time was that over 200 members of Congress, themselves attorneys, knew of Obama’s ineligibility and did nothing! Some were cowards, some were intimidated, and some knew (see nonfeasance that if Obama’s eligibility went unchallenged then precedent would have been set. This would now allow other candidates  (like Schwarzenegger) who were not natural born citizens to hold the office of POTUS … and voila the Constitution would have been changed without a single Senator or Congressperson having to cast a vote. This is subterfuge, pure and simple.

Never forget what law Professor Peter J. Spiro made abundantly clear on the topic …

[…] “Constitutional questions do not require constitutional decisions. If non-judicial actors—including Congress (Frank, Hatch, Kennedy, Waters, Graham, McCaskill, Conyers), editorialists (NY Times, MSNBC, LA Times et al), leading members of the bar (Turley, Dean, Epstein, Toobin) , and the People themselves (can you say Kool-Aid?)manage to generate a constitutional consensus, there isn’t much that the courts can do about it. In cases such as this one, at least, that seems to be an acceptable method of constitutional determination.

He laid out the blueprint for the destruction of the natural born citizen clause. Reduced to its simplest common denominator, the plan was to deny, obscure,refuse to produce documents that the voters of this country have a right to inspect and review, and ignore the issue.

Members from both parties are guilty of malfeasance as it relates to Obama’s eligibility to office. Some belong in jail, including Pelosi and Dean (IMHO). When the complete story finally told it will show that there was a conspiracy to put a pretender in office, by pass the Constitution, and turn this country inside out.

All of which brings us back to Sarah Palin.  Sarah you can change the direction of this country … you have to bring suit against the usurper in the White House.


I have been watching the hatred being spewed against Sarah Palin by the lame stream media and the Palin haters with absolute fascination. Going Rogue is making them go crazy!

One can almost hear their tiny brains going, “we’re so great and she is so not us! How is this possible?


Nixon had an enemies list, maybe we should start a Palin haters list. The list of haters is diverse and in some ways surprising; and they all have one thing in common … a belief that they are of superior intelligence and education (not!) and they possess superior insight into life (ya, sure!).

They are so insightful that they never miss a chance to take a swipe at mid-America and the middle class. Like Palin? You must be part of the great unwashed and an Obama hater.  Like Obama?  Ah yes, you are one of us … one the elitists who know what is best for our new Socialist America.

Personally, I’ve always thought that this kind of behavior is a demonstration of how inferior these people feel about themselves way deep down inside. If you are really secure in yourself and your thought processes, why the need to continually tear down someone else?

I heard Martha Stewart call Palin “dangerous” yesterday. Dangerous? Really? Martha, I’ve been a fan for a very long time, but may I say for the record, that if you really believe Sarah Palin is dangerous when we have an ineligible man fraudulently holding the office of POTUS while devastating this economy, then you madame are a horse’s ass.

Ah, but I digress …back to Tina (I’m the Beast) Brown of the Daily Beast. Seems that Obama’s favorability ratings and Palin’s favorability ratings are meeting in the middle.  No lesser source than the LA Times opined this morning that:

Sarah Palin vs. Barack Obama: The approval gap silently shrinks to a few points

November 23, 2009 |  1:32 am

Not that it matters politically because obviously she’s a female Republican dunce and he’s obviously a male Democratic genius.

Virginia line for Sarah Palin Going Rogue Book buyers

But Sarah Palin’s poll numbers are strengthening.

And President Obama’s are sliding.

Guess what? They’re about to meet in the 40s.

Depending, of course, on which recent set of numbers you peruse and how the questions are phrased, 307 days into his allotted 1,461 the 44th president’s approval rating among Americans has slid to 49% or 48%, showing no popularity bounce from his many happy trips, foreign and domestic.

Riding the wave of immense publicity and symbiotic media interest over her new book, “Going Rogue,” and the accompanying promotional tour, Palin’s favorable ratings are now at 43%, according to ABC. That’s up from 40% in July.

One poll even gives her a 47% favorable. ( LOL…Imagine that!)

As his numbers go into the tank, hers are going upward, much to consternation and jealousy of Ms. Brown.  According to Rasmussen Reports less than 50% of America have confidence in Fauxbama and his failed policies.

It was during the discussion of these new poll numbers on MSNBC (the Palin Haters Network) that Ms. Brown shared with the audience how ignorant she thought Sarah Palin was, never thinking for even a nanosecond that this comment made her sound shallow and ignorant.

Of course, as the ignorant Ms. Brown demonstrated her profound Obama bias, she again strengthened all those who believe Sarah is a breathe of fresh air in the polluted  halls of Congress.

Tina, you need to continue insulting us all … it makes us  … the millions who support her, so much stronger while making the Obamabots increasingly irrelevant.  You go girl!