Category Archives: RANDOM

IDAHO GOING TO COURT IF PELOSI & DEMS PASS OBAMA CARE

(H/T) Gateway Pundit

While Nancy Pelosi and her pals are deeming and ducking to find ways to pass  what may turn out to be the most hated piece of legislation in the history of our Republic, 38 states have been working to pass legislation to sue Congress should Obama Care rear its ugly head as the law of the land.

Today, Idaho just became the first state to sign such legislation into law.

The AP reported:

Idaho Gov. C.L. “Butch” Otter on Wednesday became the first state chief executive to sign a measure requiring his attorney general to sue Congress if it passes health reforms that force residents to buy insurance. Similar legislation is pending in 37 other states nationwide.

Constitutional law experts say the move is mostly symbolic because federal laws supersede those of the states. But the movement reflects a growing national frustration with President President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul.

Democrats are hoping to pass a version of the reform by this weekend.

Last week, Virginia legislators passed a measure similar to Idaho’s new law, but Otter was the first state chief executive to sign such a bill, according the American Legislative Exchange Council, which created model legislation for Idaho and other states. The Washington, D.C.,-based nonprofit group promotes limited government.

HATE OBAMA CARE? LOUISE SLAUGHTER & DR. EDWIN VIEIRA … TWO NAMES YOU NEED TO KNOW

Pelosi wants to pass Obama Care legislation by deeming it so.

This is akin to deeming Obama is a natural born citizen.  It seems the Dems like to use the word deem in place of ignore.  Nancy and her pals of socialist/progressive thugs ignored the Constitution to get Obama elected, so what’s the big deal about a piece of legislation?  Kick it to the curb … after all, as our Dear Leader has opined in the past, “It’s a flawed document!”   Who cares, right?  The tactic is unconstitutional under Article 1, Section 7 and likely to be ruled so by the Supreme Court … so what!

So, how does Pelosi pull off this trick?  It’ NY Representative … Louise Slaughter (ironic name for someone intent on destroying the Constitution, don’t ya think?) to the rescue with a way to pass a bill that over the 65% of the country does not want.  It’s called let’s pretend we voted on it or the Slaughter Solution.

THEY WILL STOP AT NOTHING
Democratic leader Rep. Chris Van Hollen admitted today on FOX News Sunday that democrats will use the unconstitutional “Slaughter Rule” to ram their pro-abortion nationalized health care bill through Congress. Democrats announced this tactic last week. They will pass the bill without voting on it. They will take over one-sixth of the US economy without even voting on it.

Now why do you need to know who Dr. Edwin Vieira is?  Here’s why.

Dr. Vieira who holds four degrees from Harvard: A.B. (Harvard College), A.M. and Ph.D. (Harvard Graduate School of Arts and Sciences), and J.D. (Harvard Law School) stated last year before the election, that legislation passed under a fraudulently elected President is null and void.   This is a legal scholar of renown, not a wing-nut so there’s no need to duck for cover.

To date, not a single person in the MSM has taken on Dr. Vieira about the consequences of a fraudulent President (in this case Obama) and legislation passed while in office. Not a single talking head (not Beck, O’Reilly, Matthews, Olbermann, Tobin, Turley, etc, etc, etc,) has had the balls to discuss the Obama/McCain/ natural born citizen clause in the Constitution in an open and honest way.

If Obama, born a British citizen (because his father was a British citizen and his mother was too young to confer her U.S. citizenship status to her son)  cannot produce documents proving that both parents were U.S. citizens at the time of his birth (naturalized is not natural born) and that he was born in the United States or on U.S. territory, he’s never been legally President.  TARP, the “stimulus “bills, Obama Care …. all are moot!

For the record, the last time Congress addressed the Natural Born Citizen clause in an open and honest way was in 2000.  Read H.J.Res. 88 here.

The last time the MSM talked or wrote the the NBC clause was in 2004, before Obama ran for the office of POTUS.

ATTORNEY GENERAL KEN CUCCINELLIA SHOULDN’T BACK AWAY FROM OBAMA ELIGIBILITY QUESTIONS

The question is simple, one I have repeatedly asked since August of 2008.

Where in the Constitution does it state that a person who is born a dual citizen at the time of birth is allowed to run for the office of President of the United States?

Answer. Nowhere.

Dual citizens are not allowed to hold the highest office in the land.  The truth is that Obama has never been eligible to be POTUS.

He knows that, the MSM (including FOX) knows that, and so too a lengthy list of attorneys, talking heads, and legal scholars (Tobin, Turley, Dean et al) who wrap themselves in the Constitution when it suits their purposes.  Obama suited their purposes.   This group (which included Bill and Hillary haters) kicked the Constitution to the curb so they could move forward with their progressive agenda for changing America.

While questions revolving around his birthplace continue to swirl, it is his British/ dual citizenship at the time of his birth that automatically disqualified him from ever holding the highest office in the land, regardless of his having been born in Hawaii or Kenya.

All the concentration on Obama’s long form birth certificate has proved to be a handy bludgeoning tool used by the MSM.  Yell “Birther” and see how many politicians are willing to stand their ground.

For a moment let me lend some credibility to people who question Obama’s eligibility and remind you that when Hillary was running that Bill Clinton mentioned Obama’s eligibility, some would say, making him the First Birther!

Now comes the latest politician willing to talk about Obama’s eligibility … for a short time anyway until, predictably,  the Birther charge was hurled at Virginia Attorney General Cuccinellia.  The timing is very interesting because Obamacare is also front and center.

Just a reminder, if we are correct and Obama has always been ineligible to hold office then every piece of legislation, including TARP and the hated Health Care bill Team Obama is determined to ram down America’s throat, would be null … void of legal force!

This despised 3,000 page monstrosity of payoffs and kick-backs masquerading as legislation could not be law.  Remember this point as you look at this video.

Here’s another really good question.  If Pelosi, Reid, and the Democrats are determined to use any means possible to pass Obamacare, despite the fact that most of the citizens of this country DO NOT WANT THIS BILL TO PASS, how long do you think it will be before an Attorney General in one of the 50 states decides to challenge the bill as being unconstitutional on the grounds that Obama, born a British/dual citizen is not legitimately President?




TEAM OBAMA’S ANSWER TO THE TEA PARTY MOVEMENT … THE COFFEE PARTY?

I know I’ve been gone for several weeks … unable to write because of the pressures of business and survival in a economic atmosphere designed for only the hardiest of individuals … however, is this the best Team Obama can come up with?  The Coffee Party? coffee stainOh, pa leese!  Geez … there’s hokey and then there’s really hokey!

Let me see, if I have it right, a new “grass roots” movement is arising in response to the wildly successful Tea Party Movement, a genuine grass roots movement borne out of the frustration of watching a faux President and his Democratic/socialist lap dogs in a the government gone wild … impervious to the wishes of the populace.

The problem with anything obviously contrived is that it is so easily identified.  Metaphorically speaking it is akin to a pimple at the end of a big honker of a nose.  It appears that in addition to lacking a single good idea as to how to get the economy going or  how to lead and govern, this group of pea brains also lacks genuine creativity.  I can hear the brain storming  (I know that’s an oxymoron) now, ” ya well, if they can call themselves Tea Party members we can be Coffee Party members … tea’s a drink, coffee’s a drink, right? It’s a natural!”  No Mensa members here.

Hey, any of you whiz kids ever hear of the Boston Tea Party?  No?  Thought as much.  Here’s something else that’s no surprise; unlike the genuine article the Tea Party Movement, CNN, the Washington Post, and HuffPo all have put a positive spin on the new Coffee Party (ahem, would that be Starbucks, Maxwell House, Dunkin Donuts perhaps) Movement.  Unlike the derisive rhetoric used to describe any participant of the Tea Parties, the new Coffee Party participants are reasoned, reasonable folk who just want to get along (everybody sing Kumbaya, my Lord, Kumbaya)  … with a political Rodney King mind set as it were.

FYI, here’s a copy of their mission statement

MISSION: The Coffee Party Movement gives voice to Americans who want to see cooperation in government. We recognize that the federal government is not the enemy of the people, but the expression of our collective will (emphasis mine), and that we must participate in the democratic process in order to address the challenges that we face as Americans. As voters and grassroots volunteers, we will support leaders who work toward positive solutions, and hold accountable those who obstruct them.

Bless their collective, no dodge ball playing, everybody gets a trophy,  little hearts as they look for solutions while ignoring the Constitution.  One last thought.  Phony movements are like phony laughs  … they are empty, devoid of real sustainable emotion … and all the coffee in the world won’t change that!


WORLD TRADE CENTER BUILDING #7 … LEGITIMATE QUESTIONS REMAIN

WTC 7  or World Trade Center building #7 collapsed many hours after the Twin Towers were felled by the attack on 9/11.  I wrote about WTC 7 several months ago primarily because of the questions surrounding its mysterious collapse  … no strike that … make it demolition.

For me, this is simple … buildings don’t fall by themselves, yet WTC #7 seems to have done just that.


I know there are many 9/11 conspiracy theorists who believe that the Government was somehow involved. I can’t go there … it is an act so heinous, incomprehensible that people in our government could be involved.  However, Building 7 is different.  Ten minutes of investigation will show you that.


The Washingston Times is reporting the following:

A lingering technical question about the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks still haunts some, and it has political implications: How did 200,000 tons of steel disintegrate and drop in 11 seconds? A thousand architects and engineers want to know, and are calling on Congress to order a new investigation into the destruction of the Twin Towers and Building 7 at the World Trade Center.

“In order to bring down this kind of mass in such a short period of time, the material must have been artificially, exploded outwards,” says Richard Gage, a San Francisco architect and founder of the nonprofit Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

Mr. Gage, who is a member of the American Institute of Architects, managed to persuade more than 1,000 of his peers to sign a new petition requesting a formal inquiry.

“The official Federal Emergency Management [Agency] and National Institute of Standards and Technology reports provide insufficient, contradictory and fraudulent accounts of the circumstances of the towers’ destruction. We are therefore calling for a grand jury investigation of NIST officials,” Mr. Gage adds.

The technical issues surrounding the collapse of the towers has prompted years of debate, rebuttal and ridicule.

He is particularly disturbed by Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper, which was not hit by an aircraft, yet came down in “pure free-fall acceleration. He also says that more than 100 first-responders reported explosions and flashes as the towers were falling and cited evidence of “multi-ton steel sections ejected laterally 600 ft. at 60 mph” and the “mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete & metal decking.”

The truth is, I no longer believe anyone  in a position of power has our best interests at heart … sure as hell not the MSM … and we can forget just about everyone in Washington.  So I continue to ask, “what really happened to WTC #7?”

This is a question well worth investigation.


IS THERE A BIGGER LIAR THAN OBAMA?

Some things just speak for themselves.  This is posted with little comment.  Hat tip to Flopping Aces.  The Anointed One, our faux executive in chief, could not contain himself … 16 lies in 7 minutes! Phew!

Wonder if that’s a new record?


STOP THE PRESSES …THE NY TIMES DISCOVERS THE IMPORTANCE OF THE TEA PARTY MOVEMENT THIS WEEKEND!

Well, well, well … the New York Times is discovering the importance of the Tea Party Movement, or so it was pronounced this morning on Morning Joe.

Let’s see, what did it take to get the Gray Lady to move her arse?  Was it the mass march on Washington this past September?   It is estimated that over 1 million people went to Washington to voice their concerns about health care and taxes. No, no, no!

Maybe it was town hall meetings where thousands of angry constituents across the country confronted their elected Washington officials. No, no, no!

Ok then, when Democrat John Corzine lost the governor’s race in New Jersey to a Republican challenger, or when Virginia also elected a Republican governor.  That had an impact didn’t it? Nope, that didn’t do it either.

Well boys ‘n girls we all know how the world changed on Tuesday with the election of Republican Scott Brown to the Senate seat that Teddy Kennedy held for 40 years.  This finally caught the Times attention.

Don’t expect fair coverage, this is after all, a bastion of progressive insanity and foolishness … an Obama stink tank.  I wouldn’t hold my breathe wondering if the pejorative “teabagger” finds it’s way into article either.  Betcha $50 bucks it does!

So look for an analysis that bears little resemblance to the truth … look for something shallow and superficial … looks for a hit job!

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Jon Stewart finally nails Olbermann … It’s about time!

I don’t watch Jon Stewart as much as I used to.

There was a time when watching the Daily Show was a necessity. Lately, not so much. During presidential campaign he remained someone whose wit could be counted on to highlight the foolish acts of hypocrites in both parties. He skewered both sides … until Obama was elected.

Then slowly but surely he was no different than the suck-ups and sycophants over at MSNBC and elsewhere. I’ve been tempted to write about how I remembered Stewart when he was funny … and then this. He nailed Olbermann the other night … and it’s about time!

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
Special Comment – Keith Olbermann’s Name-Calling
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Political Humor Health Care Crisis

For more on Olbermann read here and here.

OBAMA,COAKLEY, & THE DEMS IMPLODING … SCOTT BROWN WILL WIN

I’ve been watching the Coakley/Brown  race for Teddy Kennedy’s the People’s Senate seat in Massachusetts with amusement and fascination.

The last few days have shown the world that there is no gutter the desperate Dems won’t get into, no evil or despicable act they will pass on, no lie too big for the Dems and team Obama.  Character assassination?  No problemo!   So what if Brown didn’t really vote to prevent women from getting rape kits!  The pictures looked good didn’t they? Besides isn’t this the same foolproof BS that got the Constitutionally ineligible fraud elected President?

Ya, well I guess you really can fool some of the people all the time, but not this time Sparky!  The people are feed up with back room deals, all the overspending and under-performing. They are tired of the excuses, the phony rhetoric, the bailouts, the 37 Czars, the lack of transparency, and being taken for granted.

CNN is reporting that the White House is predicting a Coakley loss.

Oh, boo hoo! But even better is this, Hot Air is reporting that when the Big O arrived at his venue to speak barely 1,500 people were there … not counting the hecklers … yes, I said hecklers!

Regardless of the motivation, the result speaks for itself. While Scott Brown drew at least 3,000 for his big rally this afternoon, Obama struggled to fill his venue:

But Obama and a parade of Democrats who appeared on stage before a crowd a local fire official put at 1,100 at Northeastern University’s modest gymnasium spent much of their time trying to explain to the audience, and to themselves, how they had lost their grip on the public “anger” – a word that has replaced “hope” as the emotion Democrats seek to channel.

He couldn’t fill a hall for Deval Patrick in October, either. If Coakley was looking for a game-changer, she’s going to be disappointed.

Update: The Boston Globe puts Obama’s rally at 1500 and Brown’s at 2200 (in the main room), but makes the point that the President got overshadowed by the state Senator!


And if you think things can’t get worse, you’d be wrong. Teddy Kennedy’s home town paper, the Cape Cod Times has just endorsed Scott Brown.

In his last re-election to the state Senate in 2008, Brown won by a 59-41 percent margin. Part of his success comes from his willingness to work with Democrats on important issues.

“I would not have been overwhelmingly re-elected if I didn’t know how to work across party lines,” Brown said in the primary. “If the Democrats have a good idea, I’d be happy to vote with them.”

Brown is exactly what Washington needs — someone who will vote his conscience rather than spew party rhetoric.

The notion of change as an important ingredient here cannot be underestimated, not because the Democrats are necessarily on the wrong path, but because good government is enhanced by two viable parties.

In the special Senate election on Tuesday, we recommend Scott Brown.

CARDINALS 51 GREEN BAY 45 … HEY REF, WHERE’S THE FACE MASK CALL?

Normally I don’t write about sports, the NFL in particular.  That’s because my business is sports marketing.  My company has merchandised “hot market” properties, including the Super Bowl for many years.  I made a decision a long time ago not to become emotionally involved with any NFL team, because my heart had been broken too many times.  Last night’s game is a reminder of why I decided to disengage.

I watched the Green Bay/Cardinals game last night and thought at the end, “man what a lousy way for Green Bay to lose!”   I missed the final play because I switched channels for moment and came back to see the replay of the touchdown.  I saw all I needed to see, Green Bay lost in a heart breaker.  What a way to lose a big game, right?

Then this morning I got up and much to my surprise I find that Green Bay didn’t lose in heart breaker, they were robbed!  The refs “missed” one of the most blatant face mask calls I’ve ever seen.

When Adams  sacked Rodgers he held on to his face mask and twisted forcefully … disgusting!  There should have been a 15 yard penalty against the Cardinals.  The way Rogers was throwing last night there was a very good chance of the Pack going down the field for a Field goal or a touchdown.

Want more? This is from NFL Fanhouse

Here’s the section of the rulebook that applies to roughing the passer in this situation (12-2-13, p. 85):

In covering the passer position, Referees will be particularly alert to fouls in which defenders impermissibly use the helmet and/or facemask to hit the passer, or use hands, arms, or other parts of the body to hit the passer in the head, neck, or face (see also the other unnecessary-roughness rules covering these subjects). A defensive player must not use his facemask or other part of his helmet against a passer who is in a virtually defenseless posture — for example, (a) forcibly hitting the passer’s head, neck, or face with the helmet or facemask, regardless of whether the defensive player also uses his arms to tackle the passer by encircling or grasping him, or (b) lowering the head and violently or unnecessarily making forcible contact with the “hairline” or forehead part of the helmet against any part of the passer’s body. This rule does not prohibit incidental contact by the mask or non-crown parts of the helmet in the course of a conventional tackle on a passer.