Share
  •  
  • Archives for Washington Post (3)

NY TIMES & WASHINGTON POST SINK TO NEW JOURNALISTIC LOWS; MINING FOR DIRT IN PALIN’S 24,000 E-MAILS

We have definitely found ourselves on the other side of the looking glass. The New York Times and the Washington Post, aka the Tweedledum and Tweedledee of the journalism, have issued nearly identical press releases asking for 100 people to help them “analyze” the 24,000 Palin e-mails that Alaska will be releasing on Friday.

What do you mean we're not journalists?

It is an act of yellow journalism unparalleled in the 21st century.  These tabloid rags are mining for dirt on a woman who isn’t running for president and isn’t even a candidate for office.

The newspaper that the great Kathrine Graham once headed has made the National Enquirer look good. Her newspaper went after President Nixon and oversaw the Watergate coverage that eventually to his resignation.

Fast forward to today, where we have a fraud with multiple social security numbers sitting in the White House.  Instead of searching for the truth about Obama and his eligibility, his wholesale destruction of the economy, bringing us into a third war in Libya, these papers are instead focused on their Palin Derangement Syndrome. This is sad and disgusting; and they wonder why readership is down!

This is from the Washed-Up Post:

Over 24,000 e-mail messages to and from former Alaska governor Sarah Palin during her tenure as Alaska’s governor will be released Friday. That’s a lot of e-mail for us to review so we’re looking for some help from Fix readers to analyze, contextualize, and research those e-mails right alongside Post reporters over the days following the release.

We are limiting this to just 100 spots for people who will work collaboratively in small teams to surface the most important information from the e-mails. Participants can join from anywhere with a computer and an Internet connection.

If you need inspiration before getting started, take a look at what to expect from the e-mail drop. For micro-updates as tomorrow unfolds, check out our new Twitter feed.

This is from the NY Times:

On Friday, the State of Alaska will release more than 24,000 of Sarah Palin’s e-mails covering much of her tenure as governor of Alaska. Times reporters will be in Juneau, the state capital, to begin the process of reviewing the e-mails, which we will be posting on NYtimes.com starting on Friday afternoon.

We’re asking readers to help us identify interesting and newsworthy e-mails, people and events that we may want to highlight. Interested users can fill out a simple form to describe the nature of the e-mail, and provide a name and e-mail address so we’ll know who should get the credit. Join us here on Friday afternoon and into the weekend to participate.

Now here’s the best part. Go to the comments of both papers and read what people are saying. Many, many of the comments are negative.  There are some really good ones that pull no punches.  Here are a few examples before they are scrubbed.

From the WaPo:

That sucking sound you hear is WaPo slipping down below the National Enquirer in quality and integrity.

That cracking sound in the background is the last remnant of the Washington Post’s integrity falling to the ground.

wow! not since the 1930s in Nazi Germany has there been such evidence of mass psychosis ..

One-Think, One-Speak partisan lap-dogs.

You’d think this was the release of the Pentagon Papers.

And these are from the Times:

Jesus, is this what it’s come to? E-lynch mobs combing through data to use to as “gotcha” material?

I don’t remember the NY Times asking the public to go through then Senator Obama’s emails to find newsworthy materials…

Astonishing to see how low the lamestream (aka state run) media have sunk. This is nothing more than juvenile junior high clique style gossip and defamation of character. It is hilarious to watch you all jump out of your skin when Sarah says, “BOO!”
No honor or pride left in the journalism business, eh? The professionalism went a long time ago.

Both the Times and the Washington Post are sending out identical notices of recruitment!! What is this journalistic ploy? How many staffers do you plan to let go to cover this assignment with “just plain folks”? Well, I guess the Progressive “investigators” can do as well. Does Obama get to add the “volunteers” to his job creation tally?

This is pathetic and quite creepy

That last quote sums it all up, doesn’t it?

 






Share

SARAH PALIN & THE NEW FACE OF FEMINISM (Part 1)

Sarah Palin just may be the most complete woman I have ever seen!

She’s a mayor and governor, a mom, a married woman with 5 children who has been with the same man she married since high school, she hunts and shots, is an accomplished athlete, she’ sexy (yes, it’s OK to acknowledge the obvious and not take offense) and smart, intelligent, a problem solver, tough as nails . . . what’s not to love!

And, that, boys and girls, is why tired sour old pusses like Sally Quinn and Maureen Dowd dislike her and are threatened by her. She’s everything they aren’t. If that wasn’t enough Sarah is clearly happy with who she is! That’s got to be galling to these old time, out of vogue, feminists. It’s not their ages that make them passe, its their adherence to the 70′s feminist model orthodoxy … the one so many young women today have chosen to reject.

Sarah’s brand of feminism is not an extreme of the left or of the right. Sarah Palin is not Phyllis Schlafly or Dr. Laura or Gloria Steinem. In truth, Sarah chose a life style someplace in the middle. She may not have it all, but she’s damn close! And she’s authentic in a way those other pusses will never be, will never understand or “get”.

Shouldn’t old time feminists like Sally and Maureen be singing Sarah’s praises? Wasn’t the reason all those bras were burned was so women would have the right to choose? Well, yes and no. The truth is, the underlying current of the 70′s feminism was, the right to choose really meant the right to choose abortion, to disparage men, to choose career over family. You always had the feeling that when a woman choose not to have a career or “just” to have a family that the choice was considered second rate. I think many women felt their choice of a traditional family was looked down on and thought to be quaint . . . a throw back to yesteryear.

That’s sad, because the right ot choose should mean exactly that; and either choice should be celebrated and not diminished by either side. That having be said let me be perfectly clear. The feminism of the 60′s and 70′s had to be fought and many of the issues then remain with us now, not the least of which is the rampant sexism that plagued Hillary and which Sarah and women across the country deal with on a daily basis.

I grew up in a single family home. My mother had to work nights (11pm to 7am) as a machinist for 14 years because my father, the sperm donor, (a term Dr. Laura coined to identify men who father children, leave, and do nothing to support them) deserted my mother leaving her with two little girls to support, ages 4 and 5 years respectively. How she did everything I will never understand. She worked nights, made sure we had piano lessons, tap dancing lessons, she made our clothes, canned food, made our lives as complete as she could under the circumstances she was given.

How far have we come? When my mother wanted to buy a house, she had to have my grandfather co-sign for the loan because banks didn’t lend money to divorced single women. Women didn’t have the ability to get credit in their own names until 1976 when a law was passed preventing banks and credit card companies from discriminating.

Title IX had yet to be passed. For those who don’t know Title IX gives women the same rights and access to sports as men. Before that, girls and women were cheated, big time. When I taught and coached in the 70′s I was also the girls department head. The high school budget for boys sports teams was $50,000.00 . . . a tidy sum in the 70′s. The budget for the girls sports teams was $5,000.00. I taught in one of the wealthiest communities in Connecticut and we had to hold bake sales to get new uniforms for the girls hockey team because there was no money in the budget!

How far do we still have to go? When I left teaching I became a business woman through a series of circumstances in my life. I’ve been in business with a male partner (my husband at the time) and without and I can tell you first hand that it is definitely easier trying to finance a business when lenders think there is a man that is heading the operation. Little has changed over the years. Here we are in 2008, and women . . . small business owners for the most part . . . already acknowledged to be a primary engine in the U.S. economy get little help!

After last night’s speech at the Republican Convention, America has a new political leader. Women have a new hero, and for all the rest of you who don’t get it . . . she’s our next Vice President! Deal with it!

You go girl! You go girl! You go girl!

Share

DEM’S ATTACKS ON PALIN PATHETIC & PREDICTIBLE#1

OK boys ‘ girls, let’s go with the Dem’s first attack, the first in a series.

McCain picked Sarah Palin just because she’s a woman. And we know that, why? Well, because its been reported that McCain had only one phone call with her 5 o 6 months before he picked her.

Might I offer the following observation. That kind of comment should be expected from a group that vetted multiple choices for the Democratic VP and the best they could come up with, after many months of searching, was Joe Biden. The only interesting name, as reported by the MSM, was Chet Edwards, but he was eliminated because of fears that the great unwashed, the voters of this country might get his name mixed up with John Edwards.

The truth is Palin was always on McCain’s list.

Far from being a last-minute tactical move or a second choice when better known alternatives were eliminated, Palin was very much in McCain’s thinking from the beginning of the selection process, according to McCain’s advisers. The 44-year-old governor made every cut as the first list of candidates assembled last spring was slowly winnowed. The more McCain learned about her, the more attracted he was to her as someone who shared his maverick, anti-establishment instincts.

But indulge me for a moment. Suppose, as the dem’s are trying to spin it, McCain’s look at her was minimal. So what? The first time you tasted ice cream or chocolate, did you need six months to decide if you liked it? No?

Never heard of love at first sight? Did Charlie Brown need six months to figure out he was in love with “the little red haired girl” that sat in front of him? No!

Let me reverse the analogy. If you take of taste of something that is rotten or vile, you need to eat the entire pot, in order to be sure? No?!?

The truth is, sometimes people, events, things are so self evident that excruciating, mind-numbing, lengthly investigations are not necessary. Sarah Palin is that good and her record is that self-evident, and that’s why the Dem’s are reduced to such inane stupidity.

The truth is, if Sarah’s first name was Sam, if we were talking about Sam’s record of accomplishment, whether McCain had spent one hour, one day, or one year vetting Sam Palin wouldn’t even be a topic of conversation. Sexist pricks! Go Sarah, go McCain!

Share
page 1 of 1
hillary ‘n me

The Cain Smear Campaign & the Elitist Cabal that Benefits

There's only one question to ask as we watch the latest assault on a political candidate that isn't the choice of the Elitist Cabal. Who has [more]

Why Are the Feds Turning Off All TV & Radio Communications on November 9th?

Why do the Feds need to test a COMPLETE communications [more]

Cain forgot to read his I'm black & I'm oppressed card

Why do black liberals and "Progressives" fear and hate Herman Cain? You tell me! MSNBC, CNN, the LSM are spending hours of programming time tearing Herman [more]

Cain Hit Piece by Politico Predictable and Unintensionally Funny

OK, I'm trying to figure out what that kind of physical gesture that wasn't overtly sexual, could be. If Cain whipped "it" out and placed it [more]

Louisiana Bans Cash Sales; Why the Government Wants to Take Your Cash

The headline screamed, "Louisiana Bans Cash!" When I heard this two days ago I thought it was a joke, but this isn't funny and it's [more]

Why it's hard to take the Wall Street protesters seriously

Nothing's funnier in my book than a guy protesting "corporate greed" & pooping on a police car in NYC while wearing his [more]

Can't we get Obama to just shut up?

I don't know about you, but I can barely stand to hear Obama say three words. Talk about fingernails on a chalkboard! The Reverend Al, Lawrence [more]

OBAMA,BONG POLITICS & MARXISM

I read this a few days ago. Shame on me for not posting this sooner when J.R. Dunn was talking about Obama and the Solyndra [more]

REVOLVER

In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

George Orwell.

besides…

Herman Cain can become the Peoples President. Unlike Obama, Cain’s grassroots support is real not manufactured.

THE PEOPLES PRESIDENT 2012

Herman Cain crushed the so-called first tier candidates Mitt Romney (aka mittens) and Rick Perry in yesterday’s Florida straw poll. Cain’s win is important enough to bring international interest, with the International Business Times calling it a new race.

Surprise, surprise. surprise, (not!) the Sunday talk shows are chattering about Cain defeating Romney and Perry in the Florida straw poll.

What is left unsaid is that the real surprise to them is that the voters are not following the MSM & GOP elites narrative on who is likely to run against the fraud Obama.

Their narrative has no room for Herman Cain and so they barely/rarely cover him. Why bring attention to a man who can really turn this country around, right? And so they speak his name in whispers or not at all! All of that changed yesterday.

One of the lessons to be learned in the 2012 election is name recognition isn’t everything. It’s the message that counts! Simply put so even a Progressive “journalist” can understand, the truth will out!

What the GOP elites and the MSM fail to realize, is that they have made themselves increasingly irrelevant to the voters of America. They are as tone deaf to the voters as Obama is to capitalism.

A Cain victory over Obama is payback by the Birthers and independents for the GOP’s failure to tell the truth about Obama’s ineligibility. It is payback for knowingly leading the nation astray. Obama’s a fake and everyone knows it, with the possible exception of the most rabid Obots.

Even worse than Obama’s fraudulent presidency (Born a Brit, not Legit) has been his clear inability to perform the tasks at hand. BHO likes the pomp and circumstance. but the work needed to truly be the POTUS. God, he is such a waste, such an empty suit!

Unlike Romney (picked by Rove) and Perry (said to be NWO), Cain is not a  bought man, and that boys ‘n girls is like a breath of fresh air.  Unlike Obama, Cain thankfully is not a Progressive!

Over at American Thinker the question was posed, “Is the Cain win an anyone but Romney vote?”  I think not. Cain is the real deal, and he’s Obama’s worst nightmare!

 

 

Share
sandstone - September 25, 2011 - (4)
 
February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Nov    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829  
OBAMA BORN A BRIT NOT LEGIT
Let's be clear. The eligibility requirement for POTUS is natural born citizen, not naturalized citizen, not native born citizen, not citizen of the United States.
Each type of citizenship has a legal definition and is very specific despite the attempts by Team Obama, the co-conspirators in the judiciary, Congress, and the MSM to conflate the terms and bastardize the Presidency.
PANCREATIC CANCER
What if pancreatic cancer strikes your family? Your donation will help fight this deadly disease.
Increase your website traffic with Attracta.com
EXTREME TRACKING
eXTReMe Tracker
copyright

MyFreeCopyright.com Registered & Protected

  • @mashable Thanks for the heads up on the commercials 2 days ago
  • Hey, why is everyone so snarky? I thought the half time show was terrific. Better than a lot of them 3 days ago
  • mittens comment about making the moon the 51st state shows what as ass he is 1 week ago
  • Newt is absolutely correct about developing the moon's resources most especially H3 1 week ago
  • 3 States taking Obama off ballot until he can prove his eligibility, GA, MA, and IL! 1 week ago

Welcome , today is Wednesday, February 8, 2012
This blog is monetized using Are-PayPal WP Plugin SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline