Tag Archives: US Constitution

MR. OBAMA WHY IS THIS TEENAGER BEING HELD UNDER THE PARTIOT ACT?

Snippets in Obamaland that should scare the hell out of you!

I don’t understand why this story has received so little attention.  Both Drudge and World Net Daily and others have reported the following:

A home-schooled 16-year-old in North Carolina was arrested by FBI agents in February and is being held without charge in Indiana after authorities alleged that a bomb threat was made from an IP address in his home. A federal judge has put a gag order on the case that prevents the U.S. attorney in Indiana or FBI from commenting on the detention of Ashton Lundeby, 16. “We have no rights under the Patriot Act,” said his mother Annette Lundeby. “It wasn’t intended to drag your barely 16-year-old, 120-pound son out in the middle of the night on a charge that we can’t even defend.”

Wired on the other hand states that this is much to do about nothing:

It’s the false TV news report heard ’round the world. Raleigh, North Carolina’s WRAL-5 reported last week that a 16-year-old bomb hoax suspect was hauled out of his mother’s home by federal agents, and is now being held without any legal rights on the authority of the 2001 USA PATRIOT Act, which “supersedes the Constitution.”

What I find interesting is that while Wired would have us believe we are all atwitter over nothing it also notes:


It’s impossible not to empathize with this woman — a widow who saw her boy taken by rough federal agents and whisked to another state.

SO is the problem that when the story was reported the use of the Patriot Act might not have been spot on? If the authorities  weren’t acting under the Patriot Act then under what laws were they allowed to enter that home and take that teenager?

Here’s what no one disputes, a 16 year teen who has never been in trouble was taken from his home by federal agents and sent to another state.  The process under which he was taken is controversial.  His mother has been given little information by the FBI other than the charges . . . and there is a gag order surrounding the case.  WHY?

Team Obama railed against Bush taking away civil rights and stomping on the Constitution.  Now in power, Team Obama has changed it tune.  If this  isn’t a case of this family’s rights being stomped on, then pray tell what is  ?

One final note, the teen’s mother says he was a victim of  IP spoofing someone using his computer’s IP address to send a call.

Spoofing should be against the law.  I see no difference between this and identity theft.


OBAMA’S TEAM TO PRESENT A NEW SET OF FORGED DOCS PROVING HE’S NOT A FAKE

The quest for the truth shouldn’t be this difficult.

I stopped asking … long ago… why doesn’t Team Obama release all the documents related to establishing beyond a question of doubt that Barack meets all the requirements to the hold office of POTUS.  In particular, that he is a natural born citizen as required in Article II Section 1.

No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.

Well, the answer of course, is that Obama couldn’t release the documents during the campaign because they would prove his ineligibility. So Team Obama did the next best thing, they put a copy of a forged COLB or Certificate of Live Birth on their website, crossed their fingers, and hoped it would be enough.

Oh, and for good measure they admitted that Barack Hussein Obama  held dual citizenship . . . his father (real father? not clear at all) was British.

The problem is neither the phony birth certificate or the admission of BHO’s dual citizenship did anything to quell the normal inquiries.   Team Obama either hoped or assumed that  the average voter had neither heard of the natural born citizen clause or would care . . .  after all BHO was the one, right?

They were wrong, particularly when people like myself began asking straight questions that should have been easy to answer.  The harder Team Obama balked at providing the documents the harder we pushed.  I am reminded of Nixon’s downfall, and the downfall of many others who have met a similar fate . . . its always the cover-up!

Which leads up to today.  It is being reported that a new and better forged set of documents is being prepared by Team Obama to show he was always eligible. (H/T to Oil for Immigration for bringing this to our attention)

This is from RepubX

Don’t know about 9/11 conspiracy, but do know from DC source that an Administration team is working on perfecting a forgery of the long-form birth certificate. They plan on presenting it in a a month or so. The source is FBI agent who has drinking buddy from University of Illinois now in the Administration. Its second hand, but the source is supposed to be solid.

They have already prepared the forgery with special paper and ink. The document was printed on a fully functional 1960 Heidelberger printing press located at a print museum in Toronto. Access was arranged by a trustee of the museum who is connected to a large Canadian banking/investment firm with major US interests.

If this story is true, here’s the problem with this tactic.

Why should anyone believe that  Team Obama would suddenly want to show his long-form birth certificate?  Are we supposed to believe that it isn’t another fake.

Oh, please, the government makes up phony documents for the witness protection programs  all the time.  Go ask someone in the antiquities market how many “really good” forgeries are out there.

If Obama had the documents that proved his eligibility, he’d have had them posted months ago and the speculation and lawsuits would be over. Anyone who doesn’t recognize that fact, should stop mainlining the Kool-Aid.  He’s a phony . . . a fake.

The time passed long ago for openness and honesty  . . . for  . . . ahem . . . transparency.  Unless, Team Obama opens up all of his records . . . all of them  . . . for inspection . . . he will forever remain a phony, faux president; and history will record him as such!

HISTORY WILL RECORD HIM AS SUCH!

OBAMA SHEEPLE DEFENDS RADICAL WIRE TAPPING POSITION BY THE “JUSTICE” DEPARTMENT

This was posted at my blog at WordPress.com a few days ago.  Somehow it didn’t make it over to the new self-hosted blog.  Unfortunately, the comments associated with it are also missing. Sorry, for the glitches.

How does one defend the indefensible . . . oh, say like warrentless wiretapping?   Attack the messenger and forget the message, that’s how.

John, Obama Sheeple,  doesn’t like my use of the word “faux” when describing President Obama. I used it in yesterday’s post . . . OLBERMANN CRITICIZES FAUX PRESIDENT OBAMA – HELL FREEZES OVER!!!

Guess that’s a bigger issue for him than the fact that the Obama “Justice” Department is intent on taking a position on wiretapping that is more radical than Bush 43’s position! If you liked Bush 43’s position on this, you’ll love Obama’s stance.

I have rules for posting a comments here; rules that include attack the problem/issue being discussed not the writer or administrator of this blog.  Apparently John didn’t read those rules.  I have intentionally left his comment up this morning because nothing could be a clearer demonstration of the Obama lock-step mindset that plagues us.

That’s why it is a topic worthy of a post.  Here’s John’s response to the Obama ‘s decision to break another campaign promise to fight to restore civil liberties and privacy:

“Faux President”? Obama wasn’t elected president by an overwhelming majority of American voters?

Using the word ‘Faux’ (as in ‘Faux News’ to mock Fox News, where you mindlessly picked this up), means that “it is NOT in reality”. Being elected president by the overwhelming majority of American voters makes you the actual president (unlike Bush who lost in 2000, and unlike Hillary who lost in the primaries).

Reality’s apparently something you despise. And your being a sexist twit only makes your situation more pathetic and “faux reality”.


So says, John, Obama Sheeple.  Hmmm, I’m a sexist (that’s a new one… must have gotten tired of using the racist card) living in faux reality where Obama was elected by the “overwhelming” majority of voters.

John, Obama has trashed the Constitution.  He is a faux president until such time as he produced the documents that prove once and for all that he is a natural born citizen,  eligile to hold the office of president, as required by the Constitution.   You remember the Constitution, don’t you?

BTW, you’d make a good storm trooper for Obama Truth Squads.    You remember those, don’t you? Obama used them to defeat Hillary “fair & square” …. not!  Governor Matt Blunt said of Truth Squads:

“What Senator Obama and his helpers are doing is scandalous beyond words, the party that claims to be the party of Thomas Jefferson is abusing the justice system (surprise, surprise, surprise, she said) and offices of public trust to silence political criticism with threats of prosecution and criminal punishment.

This abuse of the law for intimidation insults the most sacred principles and ideals of Jefferson. I can think of nothing more offensive to Jefferson’s   thinking than using the power   of  the state to deprive Americans of their civil rights.

John, “snap out it!”


OLBERMANN CRITICIZES FAUX PRESIDENT OBAMA – HELL FREEZES OVER!!!

Yes, it happened this evening . . . Keith Olbermann, Obama lapdog & apologist extraordinaire, criticized Obama and his “Justice” Department. Seems his administration has taken steps that are more extreme than Bush 43 ‘s position on wiretapping and a citizen’s right to sue the government.

keitholbermannls

We all remember how outraged the left and the MSM media were about Bush’s tactics and the wide scale intrusion into our right for privacy? This evening in the irony of ironies it was Olbermann bringing this issue to the forefront. For the first 10 minutes of his program he was the Keith of old … performing like an actual journalist.  Alas, that didn’t last very long . . .  one segment that’s all!

To the point:

The Obama administration is defending, yet again, the wide ranging illegal wire tapping program of the Bush administration despite fiercely criticizing this policy during the Presidential campaign. His Justice Department is advancing the usual circular logic argument of “national security” in defending the government against a suit brought on behalf of AT&T customers who suspect that their communications were illegally intercepted by federal authorities.

As detailed in the WSJ:

The Obama Justice Department has adopted a legal stance identical to, if not more aggressive than, the Bush version. It argues that the court-forced disclosure of the surveillance programs would cause “exceptional harm to national security” by exposing intelligence sources and methods. Last Friday the Ninth Circuit denied the latest emergency motion to dismiss, again kicking matters back to Judge Walker.

In court documents filed hours later, Justice argues that the decision to release classified information “is committed to the discretion of the Executive Branch, and is not subject to judicial review. Moreover, the Court does not have independent power . . . to order the Government to grant counsel access to classified information when the Executive Branch has denied them such access.” The brief continues that federal judges are “ill-equipped to second-guess the Executive Branch.”

That’s about as pure an assertion of Presidential power as they come, and we’re beginning to wonder if the White House has put David Addington, Mr. Cheney’s chief legal aide, on retainer.

Olbermann was loathe to admit this evening, in his discussion with George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley, that Obama’s team at “Justice” is going too far. Quoting Keith, “ the Obama Administration is flat out dead wrong on this! Right?”

To which Turley replied, “The Bush team is bringing out its Mission Accomplished banner … this is the ultimate victory for the Bush officials . . . they have Barack Obama adopting the same extremist argument . . . in fact exceeding the argument made by President Bush!” Further in the conversation Turley said, ” You can no longer suggest that Obama is advancing the civil liberties & privacy interests that he promised to advance.” To which I wanted to say, “No kidding Dick Tracey!”

It appears that Turley has finally gotten “it”! What’s “it”? its_not_fascism

Those of us who have opposed Obama from the very beginning saw this coming. You see, Team Obama consider themselves to be “good” people . . . unlike those “Bad” Bush people; so when they do bad things its OK.

How’s that line in the Ron Howard movie on Nixon go, ” When the President does it, its not illegal!”

OBAMA, GEITHNER, & CONGRESS – THE DECEIVERS CONTINUE THEIR ASSULT ON THE CONSTITUTION

Revelation 13:17 … and that no one may buy or sell except one that has the mark, or the name of the beast, for it is the number of a man. His number is 666

Well, before anyone wants to jump ugly . . .

let me say up front I wasn’t looking for this quote. I happened to hear it today while I was channel surfing.I usually don’t quote Bible verses, but this one resonated today given the fact that (Hail Caesar) Geithner wants even more control over our financial institutions and the economy.

Since I’ve quoted from the one above let me also quote from my favorite Bible verse, as well.
Micah 6:8 … What does the Lord require of you? To love justice, to show mercy, and to walk humbly with Him.

Sometimes one needs to take a break, step back, and make assessments. After having taken a step out the Obama maelstrom for a few days, I wish could say I felt this country was heading in the right direction. I can’t because it isn’t.

During mass yesterday, interspersed between the prayers and music for Palm Sunday, were thoughts of the fraud Obama and his hitman Tim “gimme more power’ Geithner.

Until such time as the evidence proves contrary, Obama remains the first man to fraudulently secure the office of POTUS knowing from the beginning that he was always ineligible.

His election to the highest office in the land remains a travesty. I could almost find a way to make this abomination less disgusting if his policies were good for this country or if he was a good president; neither is true. The truth is his economic policies are tearing the country into pieces.

SO, here we are with Geithner seizing control of the nation’s banks through extortion (take the TARP money, or else!) using fear and yelling “chaos, crisis, hurry…. hurry….NOW!” The faux President fires the head of General Motors, and the Congress tries to pass a retroactive law taxing bonuses of AIG executives at a 90% rate . . . and the MSM is talking about Michele’s short sleeve dresses!

I have but two questions:

1. Where in the Constitution does the faux President, or any president have the power or authority to fire an executive of any company (public or private)? SHOW ME THE ARTICLE OR PARAGRAPH THAT ENUMERATES THIS.
2. Where in the Constitution is it written that Tim Geithner has the power or authority to force the nation’s bankers to take the TARP money, or to determine how a bank will be run, or to refuse to allow a bank to re-pay the TARP funds? SHOW ME THE ARTICLE OR PARAGRAPH THAT ENUMERATES THIS.

Did you find it?  Didn’t think so!

TROLL! J’ACCUSE – FALSELY ACCUSED – PART II

OK, where was I? Oh ya, I had just been handed my head, figuratively speaking of course, by the site administrator over at Free Republic for a still undisclosed and unknown reason.

alice_in_wonderland1

"Off with her head!", the Red Queen said.

What was really weird was I had just posted an update on Obama, martial law, and Blackwater. How could my “offense” have anything to do with that? Hmmm, not likely. Could it be my last post of a few days earlier, on my other blog, Say No to Plastic and entitled, Memo to Megyn Kelly – Using Plastic Bags is So Yesterday? If that was the reason, that would also be weird for two reasons.

One, I’ve posted on concerns about our thoughtless use of all forms of plastic before on Free Republic without suffering any consequences. While most did not agree with me, some did. I didn’t expect complete agreement. One knows in advance that people preaching about global warming, for example, are not welcomed there. I’ve tried to be respectful and mindful of that . . . never vilifying the plastic industry.

Besides we can’t all agree with each other all the time; Kool-Aid Kids and Obama bots do that . . . not adults. Aren’t Freepers and Puma’s against lock-step thought and absolute adherence to every point of view held by their leaders? I thought so.

Two, if the Megyn Kelly post was the offense, why take this action now? The post had already been up for days.

So what happened? I still don’t know. What I do know is this. This action by the administrator at Free Republic is emblematic, symptomatic of what has happened to Americans in our country. We just don’t listen to each other any more. Most of the time, we don’t have the courtesy to give the other side an opportunity to talk and present their side of an issue. Sad. We spend more time looking for bad guys than we spend on looking for good ideas. The former is a waste of time . . . the latter is productive.

That is too bad, because we are all diminished when, with “knee jerk reactions”, we close our ears and our minds to those holding opposing opinions. Holding onto strident positions without considering, even momentarily, that there is another legitimate point of view weakens us.

Let me give you two small examples of personal changes I have made.

For years I have been against drilling in ANWR and building new nuclear plants. While I remain a Hillary supporter, once it was clear Obama was going to be selected to run for POTUS by the Dems, I became a McCain/Palin supporter believing that putting country ahead of party was the only thing to do.

I thought Palin was a brilliant pick by McCain . . . still do . . . and if the Republican Party wants to resurrect itself, it needs more common sense people like Palin. Anyone think if Palin was Governor of California that the State would have the deficits that have been allowed to grow under Schwarzenegger? No, of course, not. Ah, but I digress.

When Sarah was campaigning I heard her discussions about ANWR. Who better to discuss the issue than the Governor of Alaska. Not surprisingly, her observations of the importance of ANWR and its environmental impact were markedly different from what is generally portrayed in the MSM.

I also listened to McCain discussing nuclear power and remembered living through Three Mile Island when I lived in Pennsylvania. I still remember radio station KYW’s updates. We were told that there was a real possibility that we were going to have to evacuate; the fear was thick, palpable. I remember asking myself, if there’s only a half hour to decide what to keep and what to leave behind (forever?) what my choices would be.

I listened to McCain’s point about accident free power on subs and throughout the country; not a single accident in 20 years. Even after having lived through the Three Mile Island fear, I changed my position. Times change, the economy changes, what is necessary to continue to foster growth and greatness changes. We need to look at ourselves and ask if we are holding on to positions that no longer make any sense.

Right now the State of California has the resources and ability to run budget surpluses and get out of debt. Want to know how? Start opening the off shore oil leases. Start pumping the oil. In a barely reported story, FOX detailed how California and the country could profit. Instead, lacking the political will to do what makes sense and is for the common good, the “Governator” would rather take money from the “stimulus” bill . . . would rather have tax payers from Georgia and across the country foot their largess!

So what’s the moral to this? Well, for starters, any site/blog administrator can choose to do what they want, but I would suggest there was a better way to handle this.

I’ve deleted a hand full of comments over the last year . . . maybe six or seven. I’ve also left repugnant comments when I felt the comments were a true reflection of the person making them. In one case I was called a Nazi ”C” word . . . no not that “C” word . . . Conservative . . . the four letter one that begins with “C” and rhymes with runt.

I have a page called “Deleted” that gives the posting guidelines here. The first guideline is not to attack me personally. Attack the problem or topic of the post. This blog is supposed to be place for intelligent discourse, after all.

Let me point out, yet again, that no group has a monopoly on common sense, good ideas, or ideas for moving this country forward. More than ever before, we need to be talking to each other and listening . . . listening . . . even if the topic being discussed is one we do not agree with.

BTW, I checked my emails again this morning. Still no response to query. Think I’ll ever here back?

{{Sound of crickets}} Bueller? Bueller? Hello . . . is anyone there?

PRESIDENT OBAMA DECLARES MARTIAL LAW – UPDATED

We are only 60 plus days into the faux president’s term and I am wondering how much more can this country take. He is even worse than I anticipated . . . a mix of Carter’s incompetence with a dash of Bush’s arrogance! God, help us!

Worse still, those of us who warned Obama could never be trusted to defend the Constitution, those of us who warned Obama cares not a whit about anyone but himself, are not surprised by the mysterious appearance of “22 military police and an Army officer into the tiny Alabama town of Samson last week ” as reported by USA Today on March 18th. “No one” seems to know who authorized this incursion.

Another in a series of unexplained mysteries, like how Supreme Court Justice Scalia and Roberts appear to be unaware of the law suits brought before the Court. These “mysteries” are so believable, right? The U.S. Army would like to know who sent the military police into Samson. Here’s what I’d like to know. How can any Army spokesperson ask that question with a straight face!

The Associated Press reports that an Army spokesman says the military has launched an inquiry to find out what happened, why the troops were sent from nearby Fort Rucker, what they did while there and whether any federal laws were broken. Hmm, were any federal laws broken like the Posse Comitatus Act, perhaps?

The Posse Comitatus Act is a United States federal law (18 U.S.C. § 1385) passed on June 16, 1878 after the end of Reconstruction, with the intention (in concert with the Insurrection Act of 1807) of substantially limiting the powers of the federal government to use the military for law enforcement. The Act prohibits most members of the federal uniformed services (today the Army, Air Force, and State National Guard forces when such are called into federal service) from exercising nominally state law enforcement, police, or peace officer powers that maintain “law and order” on non-federal property (states and their counties and municipal divisions) within the United States.

The statute generally prohibits federal military personnel and units of the National Guard under federal authority from acting in a law enforcement capacity within the United States, except where expressly authorized by the Constitution or Congress. The Coast Guard is exempt from the Act.

I wrote the following on November 2, 2008.

Anyone remember Biden’s warning that in 6 months there would be a crisis facing the country and many people would not support Obama’s actions even though the new Administration felt they were right? What’s to prevent a faux President Obama from declaring martial law? Thanks to Bush 43’s signing NATIONAL SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE/NSPD 51, a faux President Obama could do this at will, in the name of national security!

In another barely reported story, powerful generals from the most powerful nations in the world recently held a meeting in tiny town in upstate New York. The Army has also stationed an infantry unit inside the United States. It is the first time a dedicated unit has been given an assignment as a response force for “crowd control” and other sorts of internal tasks.

Above all, let us not forget about Blackwater. Candidate Obama was unwilling to say he would suspend their operation in Iraq (and elsewhere) if elected President. This is one of the few times that our faux President has kept his word. Blackwater is still on the government payroll, as it were.

And if you are still not convinced that the use of Blackwater Worldwide by President Obama is far fetched, listen to this October 2007 Bill Moyers interview with investigative journalist Jeremy Scahill.

YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED, YOU HAVE BEEN DULY WARNED!

OBAMA – TRUTH & TRANSPARENCY FOR EVERYONE BUT HIMSELF


Truth and transparency . . . the words continually roll off of Obama’s lips day in and day out. T & T . . . is the new mantra of his administration.  Here’s another one, Obama’s “no earmarks” dictum.  It  turned out to be just another campaign slogan ringing hollow and never meant to be honored.   The “no earmarks” pledge was spoken of adoringly and honored . . . drum roll please . . . not!

The Omnibus bill, Obama termed it an imperfect bill (do ya think?) passed with 9,000 earmarks. So much for T & T in the Obama administration. Seems to me the operative question should be, “how many pledges did Obama make during the campaign for POTUS has he actually kept?”

Poor boy, he had no way of controlling those earmarks, don’t ya know, despite his pledge to “go line by line” in every bill and pull out the pork. Of course, constitutionally he has no power or authority to do that . . . never had that authority. One would never know that, of course, because the MSM was too busy genuflecting in adoration to point that out. But hey, what’s the Constitution, right? Right? RIGHT?

The truth is, why shouldn’t Obama think he can bend the Constitution anyway he wants to? He has gone out of his way to ignore the “natural born citizen” clause of the Constitution. In fact, Obama and his teams of enablers and lawyers have gone to extraordinary lengths to hide the truth about his place of birth, his biological father, and citizenship, etc. Here’s another truth. Obama may have taught Constitutional law, but he continues to demonstrate undisguised contempt for the document he has sworn to “uphold and protect”. Author, Joan Swirsky has termed Obama a Trojan Horse and has written about his contempt for the Constitution, here:

Barack Obama was an anti-constitutionalist professor. He studied the Constitution and he flatly rejected it. He doesn’t like the Constitution. He thinks it is flawed. Now I understand why he was so reluctant to wear the American flag lapel pin….he says that the Constitution ‘is a charter of negative liberties. This is nothing short of a condemnation of the Constitution, and he calls himself a professor. The greatest government, the freest society in the history of the world, and Professor Obama calls it a charter of negative liberties!

Ironically, there is no hiding the truth when it comes to providing basic information validating one’s eligibility to hold the office of POTUS. In many ways, it’s a lot like being pregnant. Either you are or you aren’t pregnant.  There’s nothing in-between.  Either the  documents required by all seeking the office of president, those which validate (unequivocally) the status of “natural born citizen”  have been provided or they haven’t.  No equivocations, no half truths, no half being pregnant.

Mr. Obama, either you can produce the myriad of records demonstrating your eligibility to be President of the United States or you can’t. It is clear after all these stall laden months, you cannot. There is ( never has been)  no other explanation.

Why do I continue to write about this? Why are thousands and thousands of people across the country pursuing this, spending time and money seeking the truth? Because this remains a legitimate issue that must be resolved.

This is not going away!

ABORTING OBAMA’S PRESIDENCY – STOPPING THE COUNTRY’S FINANCIAL HEMORRHAGING

bailoutObama has been in office less than 60 days and the damage he and his team have wrought on the nation’s economy verges on the criminal. The market is in free fall. Just yesterday, the DOW dropped another 300 points, reaching depths not seen for decades and the lowest in 14 years. There’s no end in sight and why should there be? Obama has done his very best to talk the economy down using fear and warning of catastrophe . . . recently 25 times in one 20 minute speech!

I find myself wanting to yell, “Can’t anyone take that damn microphone out of his hands?” Every time he opens his mouth the markets go down! Investors on Wall Street and people on Main Street have no confidence in this scatterbrain incoherent policy; and rightfully so. The Obama team’s attempts at radical transformation of this country from capitalism to socialism are being soundly rejected by millions who know that the Obama stimulus plan stinks that the bailout plans are pure insanity, fiscal suicide.

So we are faced with Obama’s ambition and the Democrats greed . . . evil twins working to end this country’s greatness while stomping on the Constitution. But do we have to endure this wholesale destruction of our economy until the next election; maybe not.

There may be a way to stop the hemorrhaging of confidence and dollars from the U.S. treasury. Obama’s presidency needs to be aborted. Let me very clear. I am not advocating anything other than a lawful removal of the Usurper and the end of this fraudulent presidency. How?

In point of fact, if we who oppose his faux presidency on Constitutional grounds are proven to have been correct from the “get go” any and all legislation passed in a phony president’s term of office would be null and void never having been legal from the onset. Let me emphasize that point yet again. The $787 trillion legislation . . . the 1,000 page bill no one in Congress read and passed would not have the force and effect of law because Obama’s presidency was never legitimate.

Quoting from Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr., Ph.D., J.D.

Fifth, as nothing but an usurper (if he becomes one), Obama will have no conceivable authority “to make Treaties”, or to “nominate, and * * * appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the Supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not * * * otherwise provided for [in the Constitution]” (Article II, Section 2, Clause 2). And therefore any “Treaties” or “nominat[ions], and * * * appoint[ments]” he purports to “make” will be void ab initio, no matter what the Senate does, because the Senate can neither authorize an usurper to take such actions in the first place, nor thereafter ratify them. One need not be a lawyer to foresee what further, perhaps irremediable, chaos must ensue if an usurper, even with “the Advice and Consent of the Senate”, unconstitutionally “appoint[s] * * * Judges of the Supreme Court” whose votes thereafter make up the majorities that wrongly decide critical “Cases” of constitutional law. Sixth, and perhaps most importantly, Congress can pass no law while an usurper pretends to occupy “the Office of President.” The Constitution provides that “[e]very Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States” (Article I, Section 7, Clause 2). Not to an usurper posturing as “the President of the United States,” but to the true and rightful President. If no such true and rightful President occupies the White House, no “Bill” will or can, “before it become a Law, be presented to [him].” If no “Bill” is so presented, no “Bill” will or can become a “Law.” And any purported “Law” that the usurper “approve[s]” and “sign[s],” or that Congress passes over the usurper’s “Objections,” will be a nullity. Thus, if Obama deceitfully “enters office” as an usurper, Congress will be rendered effectively impotent for as long as it acquiesces in his pretenses as “President.”

Sixth, and perhaps most importantly, Congress can pass no law while an usurper pretends to occupy “the Office of President. The Constitution provides that “[e]very Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States” (Article I, Section 7, Clause 2). Not to an usurper posturing as “the President of the United States,” but to the true and rightful President. If no such true and rightful President occupies the White House, no “Bill” will or can, “before it become a Law, be presented to [him].” If no “Bill” is so presented, no “Bill” will or can become a “Law.” And any purported “Law” that the usurper “approve[s]” and “sign[s],” or that Congress passes over the usurper’s “Objections,” will be a nullity. Thus, if Obama deceitfully “enters office” as an usurper, Congress will be rendered effectively impotent for as long as it acquiesces in his pretenses as “President.”

Yesterday World Net Daily reported that Obama’s eligibility is topping AOL News:

Internet giant America Online headlined its daily news coverage today with a story and polls covering the “Birthers,” a group of people it describes as “fringe conservatives convinced that Barack Obama is ineligible to be president because of supposed questions surrounding his birth status.”

Let me state for record. I am neither a conservative, or a tin foil wearing wingnut, or any other pejorative descriptor typically used to isolate anyone who opposes Obama and his poisonous policies. I don’t believe in conspiracy theories except for Kennedy’s assassination.

Thus far the MSM and pro-Obama sites would have you believe that only a small fringe element is concerned about Obama’s eligibility. Nothing could be farther from the truth. We are young, old, rich, poor, male, female, and our political positions and affiliations wide and varied. But we all agree on one thing. Obama needs to produce the records that show unequivocally that he has always been eligible to hold the office of POTUS. There is no longer any other option . . . this story is not going away.

If you hate Obama’s financial policies join us and let’s find out once and for all if he was ever eligible to hold office. If it turns out he has always been eligible, we are stuck with him for the foreseeable future. If it turns out he was never eligible, everything out of legal necessity, would be put on hold until a legitimate person was elected to hold the office.

BTW, that doesn’t mean Biden would automatically assume the office since he was chosen by an ineligible Obama. If you are a Obama supporter, join us, if for no other reason than to “shut all birthers up!”

The citizens of this country and the world deserve the truth. The time has long since passed!

OBAMA PASSPORT BREACH & BIRTH CERTIFICATE TIE INS – OLBERMANN CONNECTS THE DOTS

Keith Olbermann . . . bad actor and cartoon character is at it again! He called Senator Richard Shelby a traitor last week. Yes, a traitor, because Shelby had the temerity to answer a constituent’s question about Obama’s eligibility to hold the office of POTUS . Hat tip to a recent post on The Betrayal Blog which brought my attention to this. I stopped watching Olbermann & MSNBC months ago and would have missed this. Olbermann’s harangues and constant ravings having become so predictable, silly, and (worse still) boring! Why watch?

Which brings me to March ’08, when Olbermann & MSNBC devoted an entire hour of coverage to Obama’s passport breaches by contract workers at the State Department. Here’s a reminder of “Great Passport Firestorm” of 2008 for those who may have missed it.

At the time I thought the story was an odd one to devote so much time and attention to. If a plane slams into a building that’s “breaking news”, but this? Passport peeking? I thought the coverage at MSNBC verged on the bizarre. Someone looked at Obama’s passport information . . . really what was the big deal? Strange, indeed, to devote so much time to something, that on the surface appeared to be rather minor and of little note.

Remember, at time, the issues concerning Obama’s eligibility had not been raised. Those stories were on the horizon, months away from the initial passport story . In fact, my first post questioning Obama’s eligibility was related to Obama’s dual citizenship. This was later in the summer of ’08 when an article in the Rocky Mountain News first appeared. It mentioned BHO’s dual citizenship referenced back to 1963.

Now let’s fast forward to Olbermann and his assault on Senator Shelby.

How are these incidents tied together?

Well for starters, the answer to the question of “what’s the big deal” about looking at Obama’s passport has turned out to be a very big deal. Passport information includes date and place of birth . . . Hawaii or Kenya, for example. Passports information also details countries traveled to, travel dates and citizenship . . . US? Kenyan? Indonesian?

Suddenly the passport peeking is a very big deal if a person is perpetrating a hoax and knowingly running as an ineligible candidate for the office of President. Wanna bet Olbermann’s over the top, knee jerk reaction to the passport peeking was because Olbermann (and I would venture to say a host of others) always knew Obama was ineligible to run for POTUS.

The traitors among us do not include Senator Shelby . . . quite the contrary. Mr. Olbermann, you and everyone who has aided and assisted in bringing the faux President, the fraud Obama to the White House, you are the traitors and should be treated accordingly. Senator Clair Mc Caskill that includes you. The tip off? Olbermann’s over reaction and continued obfuscation of the truth as it relates to Obama’s citizenship. Olbermann has become a brazen liar and MSNBC is nothing less than Obama’s Pravda.

As an aside, I wonder who those two contract workers were who looked at Obama’s passport records? I sure as hell would love to talk to them and find out what was really in Obama’s records . . . the ones he continues to hide from the American people. Think there’s a way to find these two?