NATURALIZED CITIZENS | Hillary and Me

CONGRESSIONAL MEMBERS KNEW OBAMA WAS INELIGIBLE FOR PRESIDENT & DID NOTHING

Categories: 2008 Election, Barack Obama, CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES, Democratic National Committee, LEGAL ISSUES, MSM, NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, Obamaland, politics, RANDOM, Uncategorized

Tags: 2008 campaign, 2008 Election, Article II Section 1, Barack's missing documents, Barry Dunham, BERG V OBAMA, Donofrio v. Wells, Dr. Edwin Vieira, DUAL CITIZENSHIP, NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, NATURAL BORN CITIZENS, NATURALIZED CITIZENS, Obama, Obama a British citizen, OBAMA CANNOT BE POTUS, OBAMA NATURAL BORN CITIZEN CONNECTION, TEDDY KENNEDY

Comments: 3 Comments

Published on: September 5, 2009

The following statements were written by Constitutional lawyer Peter J. Spiro when discussing John McCain’s eligibility problems to run for the office of President.

Substitute Obama’s name for McCain’s and it is easy to see how we have arrived at this moment in history with America’s first knowingly ineligible President. The names and comments inserted in parenthesis are my mine & not Mr. Spiro’s.

OBAMA RIPS UP CONSTITUTION

[...] Constitutional questions do not require constitutional decisions. If non-judicial actors, including Congress (Frank, Hatch, Kennedy, Waters, Graham, McCaskill, Conyers), editorialists (NY Times, MSNBC, LA Times et al), leading members of the bar (Turley, Dean, Epstein, Toobin), and the People themselves (can you say Kool-Aid?) manage to generate a constitutional consensus, there isn’t much that the courts can do about it. In cases such as this one, at least, that seems to be an acceptable method of constitutional determination. (Acceptable? In a country that is supposed to function under and revere the rule of law? May I state for the record that you Sir are an arrogant SOB!)

[...] On the contrary, it would define the Constitution. The episode would supply an authoritative source for the determination of constitutional meaning, circa 2009. The presidential eligibility of those with similar citizenship pedigrees would be conclusively established. (President Schwarzenegger)

These statements provide the game plan used to knowingly elect a man clearly ineligible to serve as POTUS. Look at these statements. Read and re-read them again. Let them sink in! Once they do, there cannot be any question as to the extent of the betrayal by people in whom the citizens of this country placed their trust. The actions (or inactions) of these actors may not rise to the legal definition of treason, but IMHO their behavior remains unconscionable at best.

The question isn’t which Congressional members knew Obama was ineligible to hold the office of POTUS. The real question is, who didn’t know Obama was ineligible and yet remained silent.

Why would any member of Congress or any elected official sworn to uphold and defend the Constitution do nothing and allow a man who lacks the requisite natural born citizen qualification under Article II Section 1 to become President?

The answer is simple; because there are members of Congress, who are themselves lawyers (and should possess a better understanding of the NBC clause) who don’t like the natural born citizen clause. That is actually an understatement. As stated in Part One, numerous legislators, along with an assortment of other actors in the media and elsewhere believe that the NBC requirement is no longer necessary, is discriminatory, and consider the clause to be “un-American” in a land of immigrants. (Say what?)

These are people who believe in the New World Order, or consider themselves to be citizens of the world along with Obama, and/or believe (or want us to believe) that the significance of citizenship is fading! They would have us believe that this country no longer faces threats from outside sources intent on destroying this country and our way of life so having a President that isn’t a natural born citizen is no big deal.

We have varied Congressional actors who knew Obama was ineligible and did nothing. They include:

those who knew Obama was a fraud, not wanting to be “the one to take down The One” or simply didn’t care as long as their political agenda was met
those who knew and were already comprised when they supported McCain with the non-binding Senate Resolution 511because making an exception for McCain gave them an excuse to make a bigger exception for Obama
those who knew that the MSM would savage them for speaking the truth and could point to it without leading the charge. Is there anyone who believes the Clintons could have brought Obama’s citizenship status to the forefront without being viciously savaged and being called racists?
those who support Arnold Schwarzenegger, knowing if Obama’s phony presidency is allowed to stand that precedence will have been set for him to run for POTUS.

The NBC clause has been a cause of concern dating back to 1860′s. At least 2 dozen attempts have been made to change the clause over the years. Despite the MSM propaganda on the topic, attention to the natural born citizenship requirement for POTUS didn’t begin with Obama and it has not one whit to do with the color of his skin.

Since 2000 there have been accelerated attempts to address the conundrum of Article II Section 1 of the Constitution. The most serious attempt was a hearing to discuss H.J.Res. 88 and held on July 24, 2000 by Congressman Barney Frank. Take of look at the names on the committees … any of them look familiar?

Before you review these names let me point something out. While H.J.Res. 88 dealt with an amendment to allow foreign-born citizens to become President, one cannot review the hearing notes without recognizing that these same points pertain to McCain and Obama equally.

Some of these people are still in office and some are not, but all understand the meaning and consequences of the requirement that the President of the United States be a natural born citizen.

COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY
HENRY J. HYDE, Illinois, Chairman
F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, Jr., Wisconsin
BILL McCOLLUM, Florida
GEORGE W. GEKAS, Pennsylvania
HOWARD COBLE, North Carolina
LAMAR S. SMITH, Texas
ELTON GALLEGLY, California
CHARLES T. CANADY, Florida
BOB GOODLATTE, Virginia
STEVE CHABOT, Ohio
BOB BARR, Georgia
WILLIAM L. JENKINS, Tennessee
ASA HUTCHINSON, Arkansas
EDWARD A. PEASE, Indiana
CHRIS CANNON, Utah
JAMES E. ROGAN, California
LINDSEY O. GRAHAM, South Carolina
MARY BONO, California
SPENCER BACHUS, Alabama
JOE SCARBOROUGH, Florida (late of MSNBC & who disparages the “birthers”)
DAVID VITTER, Louisiana
JOHN CONYERS, Jr., Michigan
BARNEY FRANK, Massachusetts
HOWARD L. BERMAN, California
RICK BOUCHER, Virginia
JERROLD NADLER, New York
ROBERT C. SCOTT, Virginia
MELVIN L. WATT, North Carolina
ZOE LOFGREN, California
SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas
MAXINE WATERS, California
MARTIN T. MEEHAN, Massachusetts
WILLIAM D. DELAHUNT, Massachusetts
ROBERT WEXLER, Florida
STEVEN R. ROTHMAN, New Jersey
TAMMY BALDWIN, Wisconsin
ANTHONY D. WEINER, New York

THOMAS E. MOONEY, SR., General Counsel-Chief of Staff
JULIAN EPSTEIN, Minority Chief Counsel and Staff Director

Subcommittee on the Constitution

CHARLES T. CANADY, Florida, Chairman
HENRY J. HYDE, Illinois
ASA HUTCHINSON, Arkansas
SPENCER BACHUS, Alabama
BOB GOODLATTE, Virginia
BOB BARR, Georgia
WILLIAM L. JENKINS, Tennessee
LINDSEY O. GRAHAM, South Carolina

MELVIN L. WATT, North Carolina
MAXINE WATERS, California
BARNEY FRANK, Massachusetts
JOHN CONYERS, Jr., Michigan
JERROLD NADLER, New York

Who else we can point to? How about Ted Kennedy who said he would support a constitutional amendment that would enable his niece’s foreign-born husband, California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, to run for President.

Or Sen. Arlen Specter (D-Pa.), who succeeded Hatch, said of Schwarzenegger: “The guy has become governor of California. What more credentials could you ask?”

Or Orrin Hatch who sponsored the “Arnold Amendment” in 2003 or John Conyers in 2006.

You want more? Do you know how many members of Congress hold law degrees? The number is 132 in the House of Representatives and 60 in the Senate.

1. Thirty-eight law schools have graduates serving in the senate.

2. Harvard Law boasts the most U.S. senators, with eight (Schumer, Stevens, Crapo, Dole, Obama, Feingold, Levin, Reed,). UVA Law is a close second, with seven (Bayh, Warner, Whitehouse, Kennedy, Bond, Cornyn, Nelson).

3. Four schools have two alumni serving in the U.S. senate, Alabama (Sessions, Shelby), Catholic (Casey, Harkin), GWU (Inoyue, Reid), Mississippi (Cochran, Lott).

4. Following schools have one each; Michigan (Salazar), Chicago (Klobuchar), Georgetown and NYU (Alexander)

5. Yale Law (Clinton, Lieberman, Specter); Georgetown (Durbin, Leahy, Webb)

Why is listing the number of Congressional members with law degrees so important? Because these are people who have more than a basic understanding of the Constitution and the requirements to hold the office of President. And if all of this wasn’t enough, let’s not forget about the DNC, Nancy Pelosi, and Howard Dean; all who have sworn to the public that Obama is eligible to be President at the same they have worked with Obama to keep his every record verifying his citizenship status (at the time of his birth) from the public.

Is it necessary for me to point out that one doesn’t spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to keep records secret if there are no secrets to keep?

If you do nothing else this weekend, download a copy of the H.J. 88 hearing chaired by Barney Frank in July 2000. Pay particular attention to Frank’s objections to the natural born citizen clause of the Constitution; then review pages 17 through 25 and the comments of Mr. Vazsonyl. You can jump to pages 42 though 50 and read the comments of historian Forrest McDonald.

Both men talk about the beauty and majesty of our Constitution, the rationale and significance of retaining the natural born citizen clause of the Constitution, and point out that being able to run for the office of President of our country is not a right.

As Mr. Vazsonly, himself a naturalized citizen, points out:

Our Government consists of three independent branches. In the legislative branch with its two Chambers, one of them has hundreds of Members, so a few foreigners among them really do not make that much difference. The Senate only consists of 100 Members, so 1 or 2 out of 100 again is something else. Even the Supreme Court has nine members.

Alone, the executive branch of this Government is vested in a single person. I don’t think that it is an excessive requirement of the office for that person to have grown from the American soil.

I come back to my statement, which is not particularly palatable in today’s political climate, that Americans are different. We like to believe that all people are the same. In my experience, they are not.

[...] It is unthinkable, ladies and gentlemen, that a legislator in another land would actually spend time proposing that some foreigner could become the first citizen of that land. So, Congressman Frank, you are as good an example as I have met to show that Americans pour their hearts out and want to share everything, even the Presidency.

I would say respectfully that describing this provision of the Constitution, as I said, and I will say once again, one of the solitary miracles of human history, as victimizing immigrants or being unjust, to be able to run for President is not a right. It is very important not to confuse the system of government with rights. Where would such a right come from? It is a well-thought-out provision of our Constitution.

I am here to tell you, after 41 years of making the most strenuous efforts of becoming American, not just legally but in every sense of the word, and having spent 40 of those 41 years living with a native-born American, that I still have not been able to even approach the temperament, the natural tolerance, the unfailing good will toward the world that Americans are famous for.

Foreigners come here and have to learn it. It is a miracle that within one generation they can do so. I think it would be expecting something even more than the impossible that they can do it within the same lifetime, and that they can forget everything they had grown up with.

THE UNDERBELLY OF THE OBAMA CONSPIRACY… FIRST, THE DIRTY LITTLE SECRET

by sandstone

Categories: 2008 Election, Barack Obama, business, cable networks, Congress, CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES, Democrats, John McCain, LEGAL ISSUES, MAIN STREAM MEDIA, MSM, NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, Obamaland, politics, RANDOM, REPUBLICANS, Uncategorized

Comments: 6 Comments

Published on: August 24, 2009

**Here’s the dirty little secret. They have always known. Who are “they” of which I speak?**

I am referring to the numerous groups of well known politicians (from both political parties), esteemed lawyers & Constitutional scholars, media personalities and other people in high places that have known from the beginning that Barack Obama was ineligible to hold the office of POTUS.

Barney Frank, Joe Scarborough, Maxine Waters, Jonathan Turley, John Dean of Watergate fame, and many others including Barack … all have known he was ineligible from the beginning. They have stayed silent or purposely obfuscated the truth because it serves their purpose; which is to by pass the Constitution and set a precedent that would then allow naturalized citizens (not the same as a natural born citizen) to run for office of President.

These are people who fancy themselves globalists. They find the natural born citizen clause to be anti-American(!), un-democratic, discriminatory, antiquated, a relic, pernicious. “They who believe they are superior” and possess this ethereal worldly vision, diminish “we the people” who support adhering to Article II Section 1 Clause 5 of the Constitution … that “imperfect document with flaws Obama ignores at every opportunity. These globalists describe people with contrary views as racists afraid of change and who are paranoid and xenophobic.

Contrary to what most people believe, efforts to by-pass the natural born citizen did not suddenly arise with Obama. He is not the first candidate whose citizenship status at the time of his birth has come into question. One need only go back to the 60′s to see efforts, to see the number of Congressional attempts to put men into power who were disqualified because of this Constitutional requirement. Four well known Republicans of the 60′s and 70′s, Barry Goldwater, Lowell Weiker, and George Romney, Henry Kissinger all had varying problems meeting the natural born citizen test.

In addition to Barney Frank’s attempt proposed amendment in 2000, Orrin Hatch brought forth the Arnold Amendment in 2003. More recently in 2005, two amendments to the Constitution of the United States were proposed.

Democrats Rep. John Conyers, Jr. and Rep.Brad Sherman sponsored H.J.RES.2 would require 20 years of citizenship for naturalized Americans to be eligible to hold the Office of President.

A similar resolution, H.J.RES.42, was introduced by Rep. Vic Snyder and cosponsored by Christopher Shays. It would require 35 years of citizenship for naturalized Americans to be eligible to hold the offices of President and Vice President.

Which bring us to the 2008 election. Was there a conspiracy to get Obama elected as this country’s first ineligible President as defined under Article II. Section 1, (A2 S1 C5 hereinafter) of the Constitution. You bet there was. Maybe conspiracy is too charged a term; a better term might be loosely formed confederation.

What we have is that beginning 2006, when the natural born citizen chatter subsided, a loosely formed confederation decided to steam roll a candidate, Barack Hussein Obama, whose popularity was so great that it was believed this “minor” detail concerning his citizenship status would be overlooked.

This might have worked had McCain won and became the President. Yes, McCain was ineligible to run despite the obvious attempts by Congress to gloss over this with Senate Resolution 511.

Think about it, for the most part, concern for the natural born citizen clause has been mostly “inside the beltway” and “in the weeds discourse” between these groups. To the casual observer or even the most avid political junkie, with the exception of an occasional editorial or an article in a legal publication or journal concern for the natural born citizen clause has flown under the radar. Who knew?

But there was a flaw. Obama’s inability to produce a single document verifying his eligibility as required in the Constitution was simply too big to ignore. Despite the MSM’s obvious heavy handed attempts to ridicule anyone questioning his eligibility and their constant commingling of the terms naturalized citizen with natural born citizens the story has refused to fade.

Obama remains a means to an end for this group of activists. The end game is simple. Eliminate the natural born citizen clause without a Constitutional amendment and anyone from any country could conceivably be elected to the most powerful position in the world having been naturalized and having lived in the US for 20 or more years.

That would mean Arnold Schwarzenegger, Arianna Huffington, Mel Martinez, Jennifer Granholm, Henry Kissinger, Andrew Sullivan, Madeleine Albright, all could run for POTUS and ignore a key component of natural born citizenship as a requirement to hold the most powerful position in the world!

Unfortunately, under this scenario and the laws of unintended consequences, in theory Vladimir Putin could conceivably run for POTUS if he moved to the US became a naturalized citizen and lived in Poughkeepsie, NY or any other town for a specified number of years.

Before you say that couldn’t happen, let me remind you that the Secretary of State in New Jersey allowed Roger Calero, an immigrant born in Nicaragua to place his name on the ballot for POTUS along with the equally ineligible John McCain and Barack Obama.

Tomorrow – Part Two in Their Own Words

ANN COULTER DISSES THE “BIRTHERS” INSISTS ON MAKING A FOOL OF HERSELF

by mica

Categories: 2008 Election, Barack Obama, CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES, Culture, Imus, LEGAL ISSUES, MSM, NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, Obamaland, politics

Tags: 2008 Election, Donofrio v. Wells, Dr. Edwin Vieira, DUAL CITIZENSHIP, NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, NATURAL BORN CITIZENS, NATURALIZED CITIZENS, Obama, OBAMA CANNOT BE POTUS

Comments: No Comments

Published on: August 7, 2009

Let me say this up front. I’ve never been a particular fan of Ann Coulter. There was a time when I felt she should be muzzled … my bad. I forgot that freedom of speech in our Republic (don’t you dare say democracy) means exactly that. Everyone gets to voice their opinions even if we don’t like them or want to hear them. I’ve found in the last year that Coulter is an acquired taste.

While she can be viciously funny, she can also be just plain vicious … unnecessarily. I will say this, for the most part she has been a “stand up” kinda gal even when it was unpopular. She defended Imus when so many in the media were cloaking themselves with manufactured rage and last year she actually defended Hillary on more than one occasion. She didn’t jump on the Hillary train, but it was clear she understood what a disaster an Obama presidency would be.

Which brings us to the present. Last week ”marching orders” were given to those in the Conservative media to lay off the Obama birth certificate story and to stick to scripted narrative. That’s why we suddenly had a cacophony of derision about the very real Constitutional crisis we are faced with from voices that know better. It appears that no one is immune to career threats (see Canada Free Press) or threats about heading into oblivion if the truth is articulated about what we all know to be true.

Obama is and has always been ineligible to hold the office of POTUS.

This is from Coulter’s recent column:

August 05, 2009

Obama Birth Certificate Spotted In Bogus Moon Landing Footage
By Ann Coulter

Tardy though they are, we welcome MSNBC (tardy? the voice of Obama) to finally joining every major conservative news outlet — including Fox News, The American Spectator, Human Events, National Review and Sweetness & Light — in discrediting the idea that President Obama wasn’t born in this country and, therefore, is ineligible to be president.

Oh, Annie, Annie, Annie … why step into this dog poop? Now it will stick to you forever.

Ah, chill’ens notice what she didn’t say in her silly ass opening paragraph, the one carefully crafted to only mention that Obama wasn’t born in this country. No mention of natural born citizenship requirements under the Constitution, not a word about Obama’s father being a British national, or the necessity of both parents having to be U.S. citizens in order to be a natural born citizen of this country. No mention of Team Obama’s attempts to block the release of the documents that could end this all today. No mention of the fact that his place of birth is immaterial.

The only thing that counts is Obama’s citizenship status on the day he was born. Whether Obama is fully a Brit, a dual citizen, or a naturalized citizen, or any number of possibilities, his is disqualified for the office of POTUS.

The problem with the “all the birthers are crazy” tactic suddenly coming from these Conservatives is it much too little and much too late to stop this train. Not only is this tactic predictible but it is lame. Too many of us have spent months and countless hours actually reading the Constitution, reading legal briefs, blogging, looking at phony documents etc. for these attempts to discredit the movement to have any effect or to stop the momemtum. Quite simply there is too much out there, too many sane people of every political persuasion know Obama is a faux President. We know the truth; derision no longer works, in fact it strengthens us.

Ann, might I make a suggestion.

We know you were compelled to write this garbage, but instead of making the “birthers” look foolish you have succeeded in making yourself foolish. Be gone damned spot, ah make that poop!

OBAMA’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE & ELIGIBILITY FOR POTUS – WHAT LAWMAKERS NEED TO KNOW BEFORE RETURNING HOME IN AUGUST (Part Two)

by mica

Categories: 2008 Election, Barack Obama, Congress, Democrats, LEGAL ISSUES, LIFE, NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, politics, Uncategorized

Tags: 2008 campaign, 2008 Election, Donofrio v. Wells, Kerchner v. Obama, LEO DONOFRIO, NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, NATURAL BORN CITIZENS, NATURALIZED CITIZENS, Obama, OBAMA CANNOT BE POTUS

Comments: 8 Comments

Published on: July 30, 2009

When this has finally played itself out, I think we’ll find that the Obama birth certificate issue has been a brillant con job used to deflect attention from the real issues of Obama’s eligibility to hold the office of POTUS. Whether Obama was born in Hawaii or Kenya, IT DOESN’T MATTER. The same is true of his mother’s citizenship.

As I said yesterday,I don’t blame lawmakers for wanting to dodge reporters when asked about Obama’s eligibility to hold the office of president. There is no reason to duck the questions. Armed with the following information, lawmakers should seek out the MSM and ask why they haven’t done their job.

Is Barack Obama a “natural born citizen” as required under our Constitution?

NO. For a fuller explanation here:

Natural born citizenship status in a nation is granted by the facts of nature of your birth. No law or statute is necessary to grant it. The nations can make any law they wish to make a person a citizen at birth or later. But natural born citizenship can only be conveyed by nature by the facts at birth of the child. If you are born in the country of two citizen parents you are “naturally” … a “natural born citizen” … a citizen too … but a specific kind of citizen who is eligible to be the President and Commander-in-Chief of our military since the child when born has sole allegiance to this country and there is no claim on him/her by a foreign country or power as to their citizenship at birth by that country too. Natural born citizens have unity of citizenship at birth. A natural born citizen is NOT a dual citizen at birth. A natural born citizen has no divided loyalty issues by his birth since the child was born in the country to two citizens of the country

Has Barack Obama ever been eligible to hold office?

NO, but the answer has less to do with his birth certificate than with the status of his citizenship at the time of his birth. The birth certificate has become a ( purposeful) distraction for the larger issues surrounding Obama and the presidency. Obama’s Kenyan father was a British national who passed his citizenship to his son. His mother could not automatically pass her citizenship to Obama because she was underage at the time of his birth. There is a very strong legal argument to be made that Obama was born a British citizen.

FactCheck.org Clarifies Barack’s Citizenship

“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.

Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.”

Does it matter if he was born in Hawaii or Kenya?

NO, Hawaii or Kenya, it doesn’t matter! What matters is his citizenship status on August 4, 1961. Whether he was legally born a British citizen or with dual citizenship, either automatically disqualifies him for POTUS. For people who are ignorant of the real issues, it is easy to say he was born in Hawaii and that his mother was a U.S. citizen and to dismiss this as racist, Republican, wingnut propaganda. It doesn’t change the facts.

Has this country ever had a President that is a dual citizen?

NO.

Is Obama a U.S. citizen?

YES … maybe, but not a natural born citizen. Since he and his legal team haven’t released a single record that buttresses his claim, it is hard to know conclusively. It is possible that he is a naturalized citizen? Yes, but his citizenship claim is complicated by the fact that his mother renounced her citizenship when she married her second husband, Lolo Soetoro and moved to Indonesia. Her renunciation of U.S. citizenship impacted on Obama’s citizenship status.

Is seeing the long form of his birth certificate important?

YES, but not necessarily to determine if he was born in the United States. The Constitution requires that a candidate running for office of the President be a natural born citizen…not a naturalized citizen, or native born citizen, or dual citizen. Obama’s own website acknowledges that his citizenship was governed by the British Nationality Act of 1948.

But the MSM keeps saying he’s a citizen and he was born in Hawaii … and what about the birth announcements and the birth certificate that I’ve seen?

IT DOESN’T MATTER! Let me say it again, what matters is Obama’s citizenship status the moment he was born. Everything else is secondary. The story provides plausible cover but it is a very small part of the seminal issues surrounding Obama’s citizenship. Anyone can place an announcement in the newspaper. The act of placing an announcement in a newspaper proves nothing. The “birth certificate” is a phony AND probably inadmissible in a court of law!

Even if Obama were to release the vault copy of his birth certificate it doesn’t change the fact that his citizenship was governed by the British Nationality Act of 1948. He’s a Brit!

OBAMA’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE – WHAT LAWMAKERS NEED TO KNOW BEFORE THE AUGUST RECESS– WHAT THE MSM REFUSES TO REPORT – (Part One)

by mica

Categories: 2008 Election, Barack Obama, cable networks, Congress, Democrats, LEGAL ISSUES, MSM, NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, politics, RANDOM, REPUBLICANS, Uncategorized

Tags: 2008 Election, ANOTHER STORY THE MSM DIDN'T REPORT, Canada Free Press, Donofrio v. Wells, LEO DONOFRIO, NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, NATURALIZED CITIZENS, New Jersey Secretary of State, Obama, OBAMA NATURAL BORN CITIZEN CONNECTION, Phillip Berg

Comments: 17 Comments

Published on: July 28, 2009

I don’t blame lawmakers for wanting to dodge reporters when asked about Obama’s eligibility to hold the office of president. The way the MSM has intentionally marginalized, and narrowly defined the issues there is reason to be fearful without the facts.

From now on you don’t have to duck the questions. Once you are armed with the following you should seek out the MSM and ask why they haven’t done their job.

First and foremost, those of us who now number in the hundred of thousands are not “birthers” the pejorative term used by the MSM to ridicule our efforts to get to the truth. We are patriots. Those defending Team Obama’s actions are either parrots, pawns, or fools. This is not an issue of the extreme right wing of the Republican party. We come from diverse backgrounds, we are black, white, brown, independents, conservatives, former Democrats AND MORE. We are not racists, the now overly used political assisins bomb, hurled to make people duck and run.

Why is this issue so important? Because if the natural born citizen clause of the Constitution is not upheld, anyone including a foreign national could run for office? Before you say that couldn’t happen, it already has… just ask Roger Calero.

Who is Roger Calero? Calero was born in Nicaragua and one of the leaders of the Socialist Workers Party. His name appeared on the presidential ballots in New Jersey, Delaware, Minnesota, New York and Vermont. He isn’t a natural born citizen or even a naturalized citizen. Calero is a permanent resident alien with a green card yet he was certificed to run. When Leo Donofrio sued the New Jersey Secretary of State it was because she allowed Obama, McCain (with his own natural born citizenship probems) and Calero to run without verifing their eligibilty.

If Obama’s natural born citizenship isn’t validated, precedence will have been set that will allow future candidates to ignore this Constitutional requirement. Governor Schwarzenegger could become President even though he was born in Germany. This is a sneaky way to sidestep the Constitution. This is why Chris Matthews and a host of others over at MSNBC, CNN, etc. don’t want new legislation introduced that would require future candidates to provide conclusive proof that they are natural born citizens. Should this escape anyone’s attention, that would also mean Obama running for a second term!

There are a host of lawmakers and attorneys (Jonathan Turley and John Dean) who are well versed in this topic & who have chosen to look the other way because they believe the natural born citizen clause is no longer necessary. Rather than do the hard work and pass a Constitutional amendment, they remain silent on this issue. Congresss hasn’t been silent on this issue. Just look at House Resolution 88 and CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT TO ALLOW FOREIGN-BORN CITIZENS TO BE PRESIDENT and the hearing before the subcommittee on the Constitution of the One Hundred and Sixth Congress.

Why this needs to be resolved before another piece of legislation is passed … if Obama is ineligible then nothing in his Administration is legally binding, his cabinet appointments, his czars, all legislation including the $787 billion dollar stimulus bill. That means Geithner is gone, Gibbs gone, Biden gone … I don’t have to go on and on, do I? No wonder Roland Martin got hysterical on Lou Dobbs the other night. He knows it’s over and saying its too late because Obama is already President is flat out wrong!

Was Obama born in Hawaii? Maybe, but it doesn’t matter because his citizenship status at the time of his birth was British. His Kenyan father was a British national whose citizenship was passed onto to son. His mother was too young to pass her citizenship onto her child because she was underage at the time. Is Barack a citizen today, after all his mother was born in the US. The answer is maybe, but even if it is a resounding YES, the best case scenario for him is he was born with dual citizenship and that disqualifies him. PERIOD!

What’s so important about being a natural born citizen? This is from Constitutionally Speaking:

Historical Fact #3: Additionally, in 1800, Charles Pinckney ( Continental Congress (1777-78 and 1784-87) and S.C. state legislature (1779-80, 1786-89, and 1792-96) said the presidential eligibility clause was designed to insure…attachment to the country:

“What better way to insure attachment to the country than to require the President to have his American citizenship through his American Father and not through a foreign father. Any child can be born anywhere in the country and be removed by their father to be raised in his native country. The risks would be for the child to return later in life to reside in this country bringing with him foreign influences and intrigues.”

As Leo Donfrio said on his blog this morning, our Founding Fathers set a higher standard of citizenship in order to become POTUS. Natural born citizenship is a higher form of citizenship and it is different from being a naturalized citizen or a dual citizen.

The following is from outside the country and Canada Free Press, since we cannot rely on the MSM to tell us the truth:

By JB Williams Wednesday, June 10, 2009

I can’t remember any time in my life when more was at stake.

In the end, it all comes down to the U.S.Constitution. It either stands as written and ratified, or it is a meaningless piece of paper of no use to any American ever again.This is the Constitutional Crisis so many worried about when Obama chose to seek an office he refused to demonstrate his eligibility for. It should have never been allowed to happen.

MSNBC MAKES A MOCKERY OF OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE COVERAGE… LIES TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC

by mica

Categories: 2008 Election, Barack Obama, cable networks, Democrats, LEGAL ISSUES, LIFE, MSM, NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, politics, RANDOM, Uncategorized

Tags: Donofrio v. Wells, DUAL CITIZENSHIP, EXECUTIVE ORDER 13489, LEO DONOFRIO, MATTHEWS, MSM COWARDICE, NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, NATURAL BORN CITIZENS, NATURALIZED CITIZENS, Obama, Obama a British citizen

Comments: 8 Comments

Published on: July 22, 2009

Listen to what the MSM and pro Obama sites are NOT saying when they “report” on Obama’s birth certificate.

Any media source that reports on the Obama birth certificate story and doesn’t include a discussion of the Constitutional requirements to hold the office of POTUS, the term natural born citizen, or dual citizenship is trying to skirt the real underlying issues of Obama’s nationality at the time of his birth. They are lying to you and blowing smoke.

If you are new to the Obama birth certificate controversy … more accurately stated the Obama Constitutional crisis controversy here’s what MSNBC hasn’t reported in the last 24 hours, despite their frantic efforts to dismiss, destroy, marginalize, and otherwise discredit anyone with the temerity toquestion Obama’s eligibility to hold office.

These are the real issues:

There is a Constitutional requirement that anyone running to hold the office of POTUS must be a “natural born citizen” … not a naturalized citizen, not a native born citizen, not a person with dual citizenship … the requirement is for a natural born citizen. A natural born citizen is not the same as a native born citizen, or a naturalized citizen.

In order to be a natural born citizen, BOTH parents must be U.S. citizens; therefore it doesn’t matter if Obama was born in Hawaii, Kenya, Timbuktu, Canada, the moon, BOTH PARENTS HAD TO BE U.S. CITIZENS AT THE TIME OF HIS BIRTH FOR OBAMA TO QUALIFY FOR PRESDIENT.

The reason the Founders of our country made this distinction was because they feared a person born without this requirement might be subject to divided loyalities and thus be in a position to undermine or destroy the Republic (democracy is an inaccurate term here) they fought and died for. This is from a 2004 NY Times article written prior to Obama’s ascent to the Presidency:

[...]

The Constitution’s framers chose the term “natural born” not only to highlight the need for allegiance, but also to eliminate the possibility that foreigners could exert power over the fledgling government, according to constitutional experts.

When Obama was born, his Kenyan father was a British national, a fact acknowledged by Team Obama. However, because his mother was underage at the time of his birth, it was his father’s nationality that was passed onto Obama not his mother’s despite the fact that she was a U.S. citizen.

You should also know that it has been widely reported that Obama has spent over $950,000.00 with eleven different law firms blocking access to ALL records (birth certificate, college transcripts, health records, passport records, etc.) that would verify his eligibility to serve as president.

Obama’s first act upon entering the White House was to issue Executive Order 13489 blocking access to his records!

CNN COVERS OBAMA’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE ISSUES … SORT OF!

by mica

Categories: 2008 Election, Barack Obama, cable networks, Culture, Democrats, LEGAL ISSUES, MSM, NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, politics, RANDOM

Tags: CABLE CLOWNS, constitutional crisis, corruption and hypocrisy, DUAL CITIZENSHIP, LEO DONOFRIO, NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, NATURALIZED CITIZENS, Obama, OBAMA CANNOT BE POTUS, OBAMA NATURAL BORN CITIZEN CONNECTION

Comments: 6 Comments

Published on: July 21, 2009

Well, the cable networks are finally giving the Obama birth certificate/natural born citizen issues some air time. Right? Well, not exactly.

Last week the words “Obama, ineligible to be president, and birth certificate” were spoken over at FOX and at CNN. The Lou Dobbs radio show devoted a significant amount of time to the topic and asked the question we have been asking for months, “Why not release the darn birth certificate?” No need to ask that question anymore. It hasn’t been released because it has information on it that would prove Obama has no right to be called President.

The Dobbs radio show was in sharp contrast to the televised segment hosed by Kitty Pilgrim. Instead of giving us honest reporting, most of the FACEOFF segment was spent defending Obama and trying to “debunk” the legitimate issues surrounding Obama’s refusal to produce ANY documents supporting his claim to American citizenship.

It appears the only reason CNN focused on the ongoing issues surrounding Obama’s birth certificate was to take issue with Dr. Orly Taitz and Alan Keyes and to make them look foolish. The CNN segment ran 6:45; of which more than 3 minutes were spent defending Obama’s phony COLB (certificate of live birth). Using Annenberg’s Fact Check and two announcements of Obama’s birth in Hawaiian newspapers to buttress the claims that this story has been “thoroughly investigated” and reported, Pilgrim sucked up air time and droned on and on. It wasn’t until the last 30 seconds of the segment that Taitz had time to mention Obama’s dual citizenship, and that was virtually drown out as the segment was fast coming to a close.

Watch the video and ask yourself if you think Obama’s ineligibility to serve as POTUS was given a fair hearing.

Here’s the ongoing major problem with most of the focus on Obama’s birth certificate. The focus on the birth certificate has obscured the larger issues with Obama’s claim to US citizenship. The MSM’s “analysis” of Obama’s Hawaiian/Kenyan birth never gets any further than his mother was a citizen of this country. Those who want to silent us use, “She was an American citizen, case closed.” In truth, I’ll bet you couldn’t find two “reporters” in the MSM who could give an explanation of the differences between a citizen, a natural born citizen, a naturalized citizen.

As Leo Donfrio (Donfrio v. Wells) has said numerous times and in various ways:

It’s obvious that the framers drew a distinction between the meaning of “citizen” and the meaning of “natural born citizen”. A “citizen” can be Senator or Representative, but in order to be President one must be a natural born citizen.

In order to be a natural born citizen BOTH parents have to citizens of this country. Team Obama has embraced his father’s nationality. This cannot be side stepped. That means the best case scenario for Obama is he was born with dual citizenship. The Constitution does not allow for our country’s President to hold dual citizenship.

In reality, there is a strong legal case to be made that Obama was born a British citizen. Obama’s father was born in Kenya and was a British citizen at the time BHO was born. Because his mother was too young enough to confer her citizenship to Obama, it was Obama’s father’s nationality that was passed onto Obama. This is a FACT, end of story.

Again, from Donofrio:

[...]

It’s the difference between a fact and a legal status.

Whether you are a natural born citizen is a fact of nature which can’t be waived or renounced, but your actual legal citizenship can be renounced. The difference is subtle, but so very important. “Natural born citizen” is not a different form of “citizenship”. It is a manner of acquiring citizenship. And while natural born citizens may end their legal tie to the country by renouncing citizenship, they will always have been naturally born into that nation as a citizen.

Although this has been stated elsewhere, this comment from Watching the Nation succinctly states the legal status of Obama:

According to common law and Vattel (mentioned above) it seems the term “natural born” was and is and has always been understood to mean born to parents who are citizens (with an s) (and with emphasis on the father) of the United States.

What we have in our current president is a man who is the child of a British national.

Whether Obama was born in Hawaii, or Kenya, or Timbuktu, doesn’t matter one whit. His father’s nationality was passed on to him, thus making Obama ineligible to be President of the United States!

BARACK OBAMA… BI-RACIAL, BRITISH CITIZEN, MUSLIM, & FAUX AMERICAN PRESIDENT – PART ONE

by mica

Categories: 2008 Election, Barack Obama, cable networks, Congress, LEGAL ISSUES, NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, Obamaland, politics, RANDOM, SARCASM & SNARKINESS, Uncategorized

Tags: America's first black President, Article II Section 1, Barack Obama, Barack's missing documents, CHRIS MATTHEWS, DUAL CITIZENSHIP, faux President Obama, LAUGH FOR THE DAY, NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, NATURAL BORN CITIZENS, NATURALIZED CITIZENS, Obama, Obamaland, WEASEL ZIPPERS

Comments: 6 Comments

Published on: June 9, 2009

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclination, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” – John Adams

It is amazing what lengths people will go to delude themselves. Fantasy becomes reality. Truth is twisted inside out . . . good is evil … black is white. This is one of the reasons people stay and defend their abusers or continue to enable addicted friends or family members. They find themselves either unwilling or incapable of facing the truth no matter where the facts lead.

Thus we are faced with a man holding the office of President of the United States, a man that always has been ineligible to place his hand on the Lincoln bible and swear to uphold the Constitution of our country. The MSM’s narrative helped create the fantasy that Obama is America’s first black president, a Christian, and is a natural born citizen( and thus )eligible to hold the office of POTUS.

Stubborn fact #1 – Can we get the mirror out gang? The truth is Obama is not America’s first Black President as a quick view of Charles Payne clearly demonstrates.

OBAMA UNCLE

Mr. Payne, is the great uncle of President Barack Obama. He is a prop that is trotted out on occasions like the D-Day Commemoration by Team Obama. In case anyone missed it . . . Mr. Payne is white.

In the overall scheme of things, what color Obama is or isn’t, is quite immaterial, unless of course we need him to be black in order to absolve America of its sins. The truth is BHO is bi-racial; having been born from the womb of a white American woman he cannot be America’s first black president.

The following comment is from a blogger (on Texas Darlin’s site, I believe)

Obama is not black. His mother was white. Why is it that all the race card players say he is black? You can’t do this in this case. If you mix a collie and a rottweiler do you get a collie? or is it a rottweiler? It’s neither. It’s a mutt and so is Obama. Not black not white but a Mutt.

Well, put that way, how does anyone continue to insist Obama is America’s first black president?

In all likelihood Obama isn’t even America’s first bi-racial president as allegations abound of five other presidents having mixed ancestry. Jackson, Jefferson, Harding, Coolidge, even Abraham Lincoln’s ancestry is reported to be partially black.

This is from Diversity Inc.:

Lincoln, the nation’s 16th president, served between 1861 and 1865. Lincoln was said to have been the illegitimate son of an African man, according to Leroy’s findings. Lincoln had very dark skin and coarse hair and his mother allegedly came from an Ethiopian tribe. His heritage fueled so much controversy that Lincoln was nicknamed “Abraham Africanus the First” by his opponents.

Hmmm!

Ah, we do live in Obama Fantasy Land. In this never, never land Obama is almost God like (quick get that damn barf bag, again)! Seems Evan Thomas and Chris (I’ve got a crush on you sweetie pie) Matthews have moved onto being Obama Crack Heads of the First Order, thrilled to acknowledge Obama’s God like presence. To which I say, “Have you two lost your friggin minds?”

GOD OBAMA-250wi

Hat tip to Weasel Zippers :

Newsweek editor-at-large Evan Thomas appeared on this weekend’s edition of Inside Washington and lauded President Obama as a brave, great teacher who stands above everybody.”

These comments were only slightly less hyperbolic than a gushing assertion on Friday’s Hardball. On that program, the journalist cooed, “I mean in a way Obama’s standing above the country, above the world, he’s sort of God.”

You know, many of us ceased caring about the color of a person’s skin years ago. We grew up acknowledging Martin Luther King’s words about caring about the content of a person’s character and ignoring the color the person’s skin.

It seems it is the MSM that refuses to let it go. It is the Progressive, liberal, socialist democrats who cannot let go . . . who insist . . . insist …. that we believe their version of reality and not our eyes.

In Part II – Sorry guys, this dude is really a Brit!

OBAMA CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS REMAINS ON THE FRONT BURNER

by sandstone

Categories: 2008 Election, Barack Obama, Democrats, LEGAL ISSUES, LIFE, political party, politics, RANDOM, Uncategorized

Tags: NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, NATURAL BORN CITIZENS, NATURALIZED CITIZENS, Obama

Comments: 10 Comments

Published on: November 11, 2008

Memo to the Obamabots . . . the issue of Obama’s eligibility to run as president and his refusal to provide the vault copy of his birth certificate is not going away. Below are two more challenges to his constitutional legitimacy for the office of POTUS.

H/T to Eagle1 this morning for bringing these two additional challenges to our attention.

Obama Presidency Challenged By New Jersey Voter re:”natural born citizen” – Before US Supreme Court

Obama presidency challenged by New Jersey voter re: “natural born citizen” now before US Supreme Court. Standing not an issue-Birth Certificate not main point of suit. Action was originally filed against both Obama and McCain alleging ineligibility.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

PRLog (Press Release) – Nov 10, 2008 – On October 27, 2008, plaintiff-appellant, Leo Donofrio, a retired attorney acting Pro Se, sued Nina Mitchell Wells, Secretary of State of the State of New Jersey, in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, demanding the Secretary execute her statutory and Constitutional duties to police the security of ballots in New Jersey from fraudulent candidates ineligible to hold the office of President of the United States due to their not being “natural born citizens” as enumerated in Article 1, Section 2, of the US Constitution.

This second legal challenge is more interesting because it is by a forensic psychologist, Dr. T.B. Bradley, who works for the criminal justice system and the courts. Among other things he is charging that Obama’s mother committed fraud. The complaint reads in part:

6. Shortly thereafter, Applicant discerned that Obama’s Mother engaged in a pattern of illegal and fraudulent conduct as
a result of both of her two children’s birth outside of the United States: (1) Obama, Jr. born in Kenya Africa and (2) Maya
Soetoro born in Jakarta Indonesia, but the mother, a US Citizen, raced to Hawaii after each of her children’s birth where
she engaged in fraudulent conduct upon the United States by declaring a late registration birth for both children claiming
that they were born in Hawaii.

7. In fact, this pattern of fraudulent conduct is evidenced by the fact that Obama, Jr. was born in Africa and her second
child, Maya Soetoro, was born in Jakarta, Indonesia; however, both children are allegedly registered with birth certificates
as born in the United States.

8. Obama’s mother defrauded the United States not once, but twice due to her out of US births of her children that she
desperately sought to protect by late registration births with false and fraudulent information declaring that both children
were born on US soil.

If your only retort to this Constitutional crisis, brought on by Obama, his lawyers, and the DNC is that Factcheck.org “proved” Obama’s birth certificate is real, might I suggest you put your Kool-Aid down for a moment and think. Quoting from Janice Okubo, Director of Communications of the State of Hawaii Department of Health,

as told to the Israel Insider: “At this time there are no circumstances in which the State of Hawaii Department of Health would issue a birth certification or certification of live birth only electronically.” And, she added, “In the State of Hawaii all certified copies of certificates of live birth have the embossed seal and registrar signature on the back of the document.”

For starters, using the Annenberg funded Fact Check, a Chicago organization with long standing ties to William Ayres and Barack Obama (among others) is meaningless because of the organization’s has a built in bias, whether the bias is acknowledged or not. Now if you can find forensic evidence that would stand up in court, we who are questioning Obama’s eligibility, will listen.

Here’s the Obamabot Challenge. Want to shut all the skeptics up? Prove us wrong. Start digging yourself. Don’t believe us and then ask yourselves what possible reason could Obama and the DNC have for refusing to provide this basic information unless they are hiding something.

Demand that Obama and the DNC present this basic information to the country . . . unless you are afraid we are right!

«page 2 of 2

No Domestic Drones;Drawing a Line in the Sand

Privacy is produced by exercising control of information about ourselves! Jim Harper Cato Institute May 15, 2012 Enough is enough! As a friend of mine is fond of [more]

Is Obama Building a Case for War with Iran?

We've been down this road before haven't we, only last time it was Bush and Iraq playing cat and mouse. We said they had weapons [more]

Obama; Vote for Me or My Daughters Will Have to Change Schools

The Onion gets Obama's election rhetoric spot [more]

The Cain Smear Campaign & the Elitist Cabal that Benefits

There's only one question to ask as we watch the latest assault on a political candidate that isn't the choice of the Elitist Cabal. Who has [more]

Why Are the Feds Turning Off All TV & Radio Communications on November 9th?

Why do the Feds need to test a COMPLETE communications [more]

Cain forgot to read his I'm black & I'm oppressed card

Why do black liberals and "Progressives" fear and hate Herman Cain? You tell me! MSNBC, CNN, the LSM are spending hours of programming time tearing Herman [more]

Cain Hit Piece by Politico Predictable and Unintensionally Funny

OK, I'm trying to figure out what that kind of physical gesture that wasn't overtly sexual, could be. If Cain whipped "it" out and placed it [more]

Louisiana Bans Cash Sales; Why the Government Wants to Take Your Cash

The headline screamed, "Louisiana Bans Cash!" When I heard this two days ago I thought it was a joke, but this isn't funny and it's [more]

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

besides…

Herman Cain can become the Peoples President. Unlike Obama, Cain’s grassroots support is real not manufactured.

THE PEOPLES PRESIDENT 2012

Herman Cain crushed the so-called first tier candidates Mitt Romney (aka mittens) and Rick Perry in yesterday’s Florida straw poll. Cain’s win is important enough to bring international interest, with the International Business Times calling it a new race.

Surprise, surprise. surprise, (not!) the Sunday talk shows are chattering about Cain defeating Romney and Perry in the Florida straw poll.

What is left unsaid is that the real surprise to them is that the voters are not following the MSM & GOP elites narrative on who is likely to run against the fraud Obama.

Their narrative has no room for Herman Cain and so they barely/rarely cover him. Why bring attention to a man who can really turn this country around, right? And so they speak his name in whispers or not at all! All of that changed yesterday.

One of the lessons to be learned in the 2012 election is name recognition isn’t everything. It’s the message that counts! Simply put so even a Progressive “journalist” can understand, the truth will out!

What the GOP elites and the MSM fail to realize, is that they have made themselves increasingly irrelevant to the voters of America. They are as tone deaf to the voters as Obama is to capitalism.

A Cain victory over Obama is payback by the Birthers and independents for the GOP’s failure to tell the truth about Obama’s ineligibility. It is payback for knowingly leading the nation astray. Obama’s a fake and everyone knows it, with the possible exception of the most rabid Obots.

Even worse than Obama’s fraudulent presidency (Born a Brit, not Legit) has been his clear inability to perform the tasks at hand. BHO likes the pomp and circumstance. but the work needed to truly be the POTUS. God, he is such a waste, such an empty suit!

Unlike Romney (picked by Rove) and Perry (said to be NWO), Cain is not a bought man, and that boys ‘n girls is like a breath of fresh air. Unlike Obama, Cain thankfully is not a Progressive!

Over at American Thinker the question was posed, “Is the Cain win an anyone but Romney vote?” I think not. Cain is the real deal, and he’s Obama’s worst nightmare!

sandstone - September 25, 2011 - (4)

CONGRESSIONAL MEMBERS KNEW OBAMA WAS INELIGIBLE FOR PRESIDENT & DID NOTHING

THE UNDERBELLY OF THE OBAMA CONSPIRACY… FIRST, THE DIRTY LITTLE SECRET

**Here’s the dirty little secret. They have always known. Who are “they” of which I speak?**

ANN COULTER DISSES THE “BIRTHERS” INSISTS ON MAKING A FOOL OF HERSELF

OBAMA’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE & ELIGIBILITY FOR POTUS – WHAT LAWMAKERS NEED TO KNOW BEFORE RETURNING HOME IN AUGUST (Part Two)

OBAMA’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE – WHAT LAWMAKERS NEED TO KNOW BEFORE THE AUGUST RECESS– WHAT THE MSM REFUSES TO REPORT – (Part One)

By JB Williams Wednesday, June 10, 2009

MSNBC MAKES A MOCKERY OF OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE COVERAGE… LIES TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC

CNN COVERS OBAMA’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE ISSUES … SORT OF!

BARACK OBAMA… BI-RACIAL, BRITISH CITIZEN, MUSLIM, & FAUX AMERICAN PRESIDENT – PART ONE

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclination, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” – John Adams

OBAMA CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS REMAINS ON THE FRONT BURNER

Obama Presidency Challenged By New Jersey Voter re:”natural born citizen” – Before US Supreme Court

In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

George Orwell.

May 2012
M	T	W	T	F	S	S
« Feb
	1	2	3	4	5	6
7	8	9	10	11	12	13
14	15	16	17	18	19	20
21	22	23	24	25	26	27
28	29	30	31