Tag Archives: NATURALIZED CITIZENS

THERE’S ONLY ONE CITIZENSHIP QUESTION TO ASK OBAMA & IT’S NOT, “WHERE’S YOUR BIRTH CERTIFICATE?”

No person except a Natural Born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States,at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution shall be eligible to the Office of President… Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of the Constitution

We’ve ALL been asking the wrong questions about Obama’s citizenship … demanding the wrong proof! Instead of asking where is Obama’s long form birth certificate, or asking for him for the production of the myriad records that verify he is who he says he is, we should be asking Obama to prove that he wasn’t born aBritishNatural Born Citizen. One is a natural born citizen at the moment of birth with the family lineage or the bloodline of the father the prime determining factor of birthright and citizenship. To be a natural born citizen of the U.S. both parents must be U.S. citizens at the time of a child’s birth. One can become a naturalized citizen but the status/identifier  of “natural born citizen” cannot be conferred or acquired at some future date in the same manner that SR 511 attempted with John McCain. In other words, saying it doesn’t make it so! Anyone who has read about Obama’s ineligibility to be POTUS at length is bound to have read J.B. Williams posts at Canada Free Press here and here. He is the only writer to investigate who has been behind the Quashing of Obama’s birth certificate issues in detail. It was one of his recent posts that triggered approaching Obama’s Natural Born Citizen status from a different perspective.

Webster’s definition establishes birthright as “Any right or privilege, to which a person is entitled by birth, such as an estate descendible by law to an heir, or civil liberty under a free constitution.” Such as, a child inherits his/her father’s name automatically at birth, as well as heir to his fortune and his citizenship. No man-made laws are needed. In every civilized nation on earth, the “natural born child” automatically inherits their father’s name and all other related birthrights upon birth, with no statute required.

If Barack Hussein Obama’s father had been a legal citizen of the U.S. at the time of Barack II birth, Barack II would enjoy not only his father’s name, but his citizenship in the United States as well, and no man-made law could block his birthright to status as a “natural born citizen” of the USA. However, Obama’s father was at no time a citizen of the USA. He was at all known times in his life, a citizen of Kenya, which at the time was still under British rule. Barack Hussein Obama II father was a legal citizen of Kenya. As the “natural born” son of Barack Hussein Obama I, Barack Obama II is the “natural born citizen” of Kenya, which is why his family, friends and the press referred to him as “Kenyan Born” all the way up until he decided to run for the office of president.

History answers the question of what “natural born citizen” means, and leaves NO wiggle room for debate or wishful agenda-driven interpretations.

For more reading on the Constitutional implications of Obama’s ineligibility visit Constitutionally Speaking and A Place to Ask Questions.

CHRIS MATTHEWS BIGGEST LIAR ON MSNBC … MAYBE IN THE MSM

You may have missed this last week on MSNBC.  But it’s not surprising.  I mean, really, who watches MSNBC anymore?

There simply is no polite way of stating this.

Chris Matthews just may be the biggest liar in the MSM.  Matthews’ latest harangue on Obama’s eligibility to hold the office of POTUS reached a new low last week when he slammed Birthers, yet again.  Cheap shot Matthews took his worn-out racist paintbrush and accused Birthers of trying to assassinate Obama  with lies about his citizenship. Yup, that’s right we’re all lying!

If one wanted to use an emotionally charged word, I can think of no better word than assassinate.  Hey, just for the heck of it, remember when Olbermann went off on Hillary for using that word when talking about Bobby Kennedy?  He went crazy … he thought its use was crass and low!

The question today isn’t whether Obama is eligible to hold office … the question is who doesn’t know Obama is a fraud and never eligible to hold office.  Ah, but never let the facts get in the way of MSNBC, Olbermann, Matthews, et al.

While you watch the video, listen carefully to what Matthews doesn’t say.   He never mentions Obama’s citizenship was governed by his father (British) when he was born. He never uses words like dual citizen or natural born citizen. Instead, he conveniently slips in the term native born citizen (not the same as natural born citizen and he knows it) … this is a verbal trick, a verbal slight of hand that the general public is presumed to be too dumb to pick up.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

I happened across this a few minutes ago on World Net Daily.  It appears Matthews has faulty memory when it comes to Obama’s citizenship.  During  the December 18, 2007 edition of Hardball, Matthews clearly defended Obama’s Indonesian birth!

Matthews continued: “But didn’t Hillary dump on Obama a few days ago for playing up his Indonesian roots?  So, what is she up to here?  Is she pushing how great he is for having been born in Indonesia, or what, or simply reminding everybody about his background, his Islamic background?”

Breaking News … Proof Obama not Born in Hawaii … Time to Remove the Poseur from the White House

I’ve been keeping my powder dry on this for three days, waiting to see if someone would come forward and spring a trap or try to fully discredit the source of the information, Tim Adams. To date no one has. In fact, the MSM has been curiously quiet!

Is it possible that those who have always sprung to Obama’s defense in the past are so disgusted and disillusioned with his performance as our Poseur POTUS that they are going to let him swing slowly in the wind?

Let me remind anyone reading this that, regardless of where Obama was born, he was never eligible to hold the office of President. He may be a naturalized citizen, but that has never been the same as a natural born citizen.

In fact, don’t believe me. This is from Ask. com discussing Obama’s own election site in 2008:

One of Obama’s official web sites,”Fight the Smears,” affirms that “When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4, 1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.’s children. Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4, 1982.”

This statement by the Obama campaign thus admits that he was a British (Kenyan) citizen at birth and thus had dual citizenship (one argument goes even if he was born in the U.S.) With dual citizenship and “split loyalties” at birth, Obama is arguably not a “natural born citizen”and is ineligible to serve as President of the United States.


FRACTURED FAIRY TALES, OBAMA’S ELIGIBILITY TO BE PRESIDENT & OTHER “BIRTHER” MYTHS

Who are the truth tellers?

If the MSM were to be believed, there is a fringe element of white racists, looney tunes, and assorted miscreants  that believe Obama was born in Kenya … and absent that, he isn’t even a citizen of this country.  “Not so!” they proclaim as they make light of and disparage those who insist that Obama needs to prove his eligibility to hold office.
And so, we have a parade of journalists and media personalities that continue to make fools of themselves, spouting the party line that Obama is a citizen and therefore eligible to hold office.  In addition to the usual smirking suck-ups at MSNBC, the lineup of media fools also includes Bill O’Reilly and Megan Kelly on FOX (and others).

Their recent analysis of Obama’s citizenship and how it was relates to army Lt. Col. Lakin’s refusal to deploy to Afghanistan, was as embarrassing as it was silly.
Not be outdone on the perpetuation of fables and myths , CBS recently regurgitated this:

Although the Constitution requires American presidents to be natural born citizens, as many as 30 percent of Tea Partiers say they think President Obama was born in another country, according to a new CBS News/ New York Times poll. More Tea Partiers, however, at 41 percent, say he was born in the U.S.

The so-called “birther movement,” questioning Mr. Obama’s origins, began during his presidential campaign. It has steadily persisted through Mr. Obama’s presidency, in spite of overwhelming evidence he was born in the United States — including his 1961 birth announcement, printed in two Hawaii newspapers. (What a joke! There isn’t overwhelming proof … andthe birth announcements are meaningless!)

The myth persists among the larger American population, but to a lesser degree, according to the poll, conducted April 5 – 12. Thirty-two percent of Republicans think the president was born in another country.  Among Americans overall, 58 percent think Mr. Obama was born in this country, while 20 percent say he was born elsewhere. Significant percentages aren’t sure or don’t have an opinion.

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton,Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Here’s what the MSM filters out from the general public:

  • Whether Obama was born in Hawaii or Kenya is immaterial because at the time of Obama’s birth, his father was a British citizen and his mother was too young to pass citizenship on to her son, making Obama a British citizen when he was born.

This is from Accuracy in Media:

In 1961, if a 17-year-old American female gave birth in a foreign country to a child whose father was not a U.S. citizen, that child had no right to any American citizenship, let alone the “natural born” citizenship that qualifies someone for the Presidency under Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution. In 1961, the year of Obama’s birth, under Sec. 301 (a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, Ann Dunham could not transmit citizenship of any kind to her son.

  • Even if there is a case for Obama’s dual citizenship when he was born, the Constitution does not allow for a person with dual citizenship to hold the office of POTUS.
  • Even if Obama could prove his citizenship today as a naturalized citizen, that does not make him a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.
  • There are lawsuits that are quietly going forward in the courts that challenge Obama to prove his citizenship as required by the Constitution
  • The constant mention of the  birth announcements in Hawaiian newspapers ARE NOT PROOF that Obama was born in the US.  In fact, they couldn’t be used in a court because they do not meet the minimum standards of proof!
  • The consequences of Obama assuming the office of President knowing he was ineligible are very serious!  They are equally serious for those who knowingly assisted Obama get “elected” to office … that includes Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and Howard Dean (to name a few!)
  • Those in the military who have chosen to challenge Obama’s eligibility are heroes who have an obligation to challenge ORDERS THAT THEY BELIEVE TO BE UNLAWFUL!
  • There is mounting evidence that Obama was, indeed born in Kenya.  In just the last two weeks there have been numerous detailed stories from Kenyan officials saying without equivocation that BHO was born a Kenyan (British) citizen.  They can be read here and here
  • Obama has blocked all access to his every one of his records, including college and university records, health records, copies of his thesis, etc. and is reported to have spent $2 million in order to suppress the truth about his eligibility!

MICHELLE OBAMA & NPR CONFIRM “THE PRES” WAS BORN IN KENYA … AND STILL THE CHARADE GOES ON!

Let’s get this straight … Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, is not now nor has he ever been eligible to hold the office of POTUS.  In fact, the chances are that, under the law he may be an illegal alien as easily as he is possibly a naturalized citizen (not natural born as required under the Constitution), but since all records concerning his real citizenship remain hidden, the speculation continues.

So who are you going to believe?  How ’bout Michelle Obama?  She should know where Obie was born; right?


Not enough for you?  How ’bout NPR?

National Public Radio has said Obie was born in Kenya. Say what?  NPR? Yup … although NPR deleted this reference as soon as it was reported by World Net Daily.

Detailed stories concerning how the evidence is mounting against the “Born in the USA” story read here and here.

Here’s an excellent video on faux President Obama, code name “Renegade” by the Secret Service, the FBI and the CIA.



PALIN V. OBAMA … WHY SARAH PALIN MUST BRING SUIT AGAINST BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA

Sarah Palin recently stated that bringing up questions about Obama’s birth certificate are fair game and she’s right.  She’s also the only one in the country that could bring a lawsuit challenging Obama’s citizenship status  & eligibility for POTUS that the courts and the MSM could not ignore!

Why?  Because she, as a plaintiff, would have undeniable standing … meaning she has been DIRECTLY effected by Obama’s ineligibility to hold the office of POTUS.

To have standing one has to demonstrate injury (loss the the election to an ineligible candidate) and the fact that the defendant’s conduct (refusal to provide any documentation that BHO is a natural born citizen) was the reason for injury.

While the Obamabots have been quick to report that every suit brought to date has been dismissed, what they haven’t reported is the reason why.  Aside from jurisdictional and procedural issues , the primary reason for the dismissals has been because the courts have held that the plaintiffs in these suits did not have the standing necessary to move forward.

What the Obamabots have also refused to discuss is the fact the no case has reached a point where the merits of the Obama’s eligibility have been explored in open court.

I asked my first questions about Obama’s eligibility to hold the office of POTUS in summer of 2008.

The questions were simple enough. Can a person with dual citizenship be President (no) and how could Obama be a natural born citizen as required by Article II, Section1 of the Constitution if his father was a British subject? The answer is he cannot which also means, it doesn’t matter whether BHO was born in Kenya or Hawaii, his citizenship status at the time of his birth automatically disqualified him for POTUS.

At the time I asked these questions about Obama’s eligibility, I was naive enough to believe that the MSM would do their jobs, investigate the allegations, and bring the truth to the American people. At the time, I was also naive to believe that the DNC, that the 50 Secretaries of State, Constitutional lawyers, the Electoral College, and whole host of other players, including the courts, would also do their jobs.

Well, as anyone who has been following this story from the beginning knows, we were all wrong.

What we couldn’t know at the time was that people intent on bringing Obama into office were willing to go to any lengths, ready to do anything including committing fraud, knowingly falsifying records, using intimidation tactics, ridicule and violence. It has been reported that the suspicious death of one of the men who looked at Obama’s passport records early in ‘08 was to silence him and prevent him from ever being questioned.

What we couldn’t know at the time was that over 200 members of Congress, themselves attorneys, knew of Obama’s ineligibility and did nothing! Some were cowards, some were intimidated, and some knew (see nonfeasance that if Obama’s eligibility went unchallenged then precedent would have been set. This would now allow other candidates  (like Schwarzenegger) who were not natural born citizens to hold the office of POTUS … and voila the Constitution would have been changed without a single Senator or Congressperson having to cast a vote. This is subterfuge, pure and simple.

Never forget what law Professor Peter J. Spiro made abundantly clear on the topic …

[...] “Constitutional questions do not require constitutional decisions. If non-judicial actors—including Congress (Frank, Hatch, Kennedy, Waters, Graham, McCaskill, Conyers), editorialists (NY Times, MSNBC, LA Times et al), leading members of the bar (Turley, Dean, Epstein, Toobin) , and the People themselves (can you say Kool-Aid?)manage to generate a constitutional consensus, there isn’t much that the courts can do about it. In cases such as this one, at least, that seems to be an acceptable method of constitutional determination.

He laid out the blueprint for the destruction of the natural born citizen clause. Reduced to its simplest common denominator, the plan was to deny, obscure,refuse to produce documents that the voters of this country have a right to inspect and review, and ignore the issue.

Members from both parties are guilty of malfeasance as it relates to Obama’s eligibility to office. Some belong in jail, including Pelosi and Dean (IMHO). When the complete story finally told it will show that there was a conspiracy to put a pretender in office, by pass the Constitution, and turn this country inside out.

All of which brings us back to Sarah Palin.  Sarah you can change the direction of this country … you have to bring suit against the usurper in the White House.

IF OBAMA’S CITIZENSHIP/ELIGIBILTY QUESTIONS TAKE HIM OUT OF OFFICE TEMPORARILY ARE WE LOOKING AT PRESIDENT HILLARY CLINTON, OR SARAH PALIN, OR RALPH NADER?

I have repeatedly stated that Obama’s citizenship status on the day he was born and his resultant eligibility questions to be POTUS would never go away.  Read this latest search and demand for the truth…

If Lynn Dartez is correct, and the AG cannot represent/defend Obama in his citizenship eligibility quagmire AND that a temporary president would have to in place, who would that temporary president be?

It cannot be McCain because he was ALSO ineligible to hold office despite Senate RESOLUTION 511 declaring him to be a NBC!

MCCAIN OBAMA

Under the law ( remember that quaint concept?) who would constitutionally qualify to be our temporary POTUS until  an election?

Hillary and Sarah are constitutionally eligible to be president but were on tickets headed by ineligible candidates.

Would our temporary POTUS  be Ralph Nader?

U.S.C. Title 44, Chapter 22: “PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS” Thanks Daniel Smith

Why haven’t any of you used the simple power of the United States Code mandates that are directly on point??
Like, as in, uhm?.. U.S.C. Title 44, Chapter 22: PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS
[Thank veteran Congress members for passing the Presidential Records Act of 1978]
The statutory law of the United States Code is extremely clear, even often in multiple ways, that:
a) the AG *cannot* represent/defend Obama in any challenge that involves a question of his citizenship, for the relevant statutory laws mandate that the AG be on the *prosecuting* side against Obama, if the AG is involved, at all…  In fact, whether intentional or not, Obama and Holder can be hit with “constructive fraud”, at the very least…
b) the AG also *cannot* represent/defend Senators or the Senate body, itself, in these constitutional questions, either…  Again, whether intentional or not, you have that “constructive fraud” against the rule of law thing again…
c) there are various statutory standings provided for even “mere” individual Citizens to sue Obama, Congress, etc.
d) Obama’s “Presidential records” are expressly PUBLIC by mandate of simple written law (and, combined with using AG Holder & U.S. Attorneys, i.e., our *taxdollars*, in an expressly-unconstitutional manner, defending Obama in any citizenship issues, then Obama gets to pay back every single red cent of that $1.7+ million spent so far… plus interest and penalties, naturally… plus, getting deported, or imprisoned, or whatever else…).
e) additionally, there are all sorts of various federal agencies/heads to statutorily go after Obama’s eligibility through.
I have detailed and provided the direct links to all of these applicable federal statutes, below.
Of course, we all know that Obama and his agents have fully admitted his dual-citizenship at birth, which precludes him from ever being President, even notwithstanding the obviously-suspicious concealment of virtually all pertinent records…
Who, then, are the lawful United States Prez and VP, per the original Constitution, right now, at this
very moment??

That’s easy enough to answer:
1.  Mr. John McCain, Republican, *is* the President, temporarily, until the Re-Election that must be done, promptly.
2.  Mr  Ralph Nader, Independent, *is* the Vice-President, temporarily, until the Re-Election that must be done, promptly.
(and, those two are not my personal combo pick, but that IS the result of law per the original Constitution, so fine…).

Read this post in its entirety over at Oil for Immigration. It is full of citations and enough meat for anyone to sink their legal teeth into.

P.S. Can we finally stop talking about Obama’s damn birth certificate?  It is a diversion that takes away from the underlying issues that have always been in front of us.

The best case scenario for Obama is his dual citizenship, but that automatically disqualifies him for the office.  Under the law, Obama’s citizenship status was determined by his father’s nationality. Since his mother was too young (under current law at the time of his birth) to confer her citizenship to her son, Obama was born a BRIT, like it or not!

I have been calling this for over a year… it has always been self evident.

TIME for FOX NEWS TO STOP RUNNING FROM OBAMA’S ILLEGITIMATE PRESIDENCY

(H/T) Oil for Immigration

FOX has to stop hiding, stop running away from Obama’s citizenship and eligibility to hold the office of POTUS.

The following is from Rev. Manning.  Don’t know who Rev. Manning is?  Let’s just say he is the antithesis of Rev. Wright.  Pastor Manning is definitely controversial, but so is Rev. Wright.  Two men, two views, of the same ineligible man in the White House.

MEMO TO FOX: … it’s time for your network to do its job.  If you don’t tell the real story of Obama’s ineligibility,  you have lost all credibility in the eyes of millions of viewers who have switched to FNC seeking the truth.

This story is not going away … it will never go away … unless Obama clears up his citizenship status on the day he was born, his presidency will be forever tainted and viewed as illegitimate!

O’REILLY & FOX NEWS CHALLENGED BY PLAINTIFF IN OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE LAWSUIT – GOING TO DISS ME? PUT UP OR SHUT UP!

Bill O´Reilly on TVThere is no shortage of irony here.

First, we have all heard O’Reilly pontificate that people were afraid to come on his show and spar with him because he is a simple man … a seeker of the truth.

{{ and the choir sang Amen}}

This song has been going on for years. Second, we have the recent White House war on FOX News ostensibly because FNC is supposed to be an extension of the Republican Part and the GOP.

One would never know that to be true given FNC’s phony coverage of Obama’s eligibility to be POTUS! You see, it has never been about just Obama’s birth certificate, it has always been about his citizenship status on the day he was born; O’Reilly and his pals knew that last night!

If you have been following the issues surrounding our faux President Obama (called that until he proves otherwise), you know that FOX has been as complicit at covering and obscuring the truth as the rest of quislings in the MSM. Obama and the White House should be counting their lucky stars that FOX hasn’t reported the truth to date.

That all changed last night when O’Reilly dissed plaintiff Captain Pamela Barnett as a disgruntled military person that didn’t want to be deployed as her reason for challenging Obama’s eligibility to hold the office of POTUS.

If you watched O’Reilly during his legal segment ( with two lawyers sitting across from him), you saw him continue the intentional and ongoing obfuscation of the real issues surrounding Obama as a natural born citizen as required by Article II Section 1 of the Constitution.

Much to my surprise, I just learned that Captain Barnett has issued the following challenge to the “Seeker of Truth O’Reilly”:

From Captain Pamela Barnett to Bill O’Reilly onOctober 28, 2009

I challenge you Mr. O’Reilly to interview me.

I am Captain Pamela Barnett U.S. Army Retired of Barnett v. Barack Obama.

I am sick and tired of you defaming our lawsuit and our attorney against the Resident in the White House Obama. 48 plaintiffs mostly military retired have brought this lawsuit to force the production of Obama’s vital records to determine if he is in fact a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN which is one of the requirements to be a legal POTUS and NOT an illegal USURPER. There is also a huge amount of information regarding fraud that Obama committed before being illegally sworn in as POTUS.

IF YOU CARE ABOUT THE TRUTH AT ALL.. YOU WILL CALL ME…

FROM WHAT I CAN SEE OF YOUR SHOW, THE TRUTH DOES NOT SEEM TO MATTER TO YOU OR THE REST OF THE SHILLS AT FOX. I KNOW THAT YOU ARE ONLY A COMMENTATOR, BUT AT LEAST GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT BEFORE HURTING OUR CASE AND PROPAGATING LIES TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.

Sincerely,

CPT Pamela Barnett, U.S.Army Retired

Memo to O’Reilly and FNC: Now its time to put up or shut up.

Are you going to cover the biggest story since Watergate or not? This story is NEVER going away and the millions of people following this will never let up. FNC can choose to be on the right side of history.

There is only one choice … put Captain Barnett on. If you don’t,  you will giving the world conclusive proof that both FNC and its talent know how to talk about being “Fair and Balanced” and little else! When the “Big O “opened his mouth last night and dissed Barnett, er attorney, and the millions of “birthers” who have been seeking the truth you put yourselves into a box!

While you are at it you should put Leo Donofrio and Mario Apuzzo on and a host of others can can bring real insight to the issues. Don’t know who should be part of FNC’s extensive coverage of the real issues surrounding Obama’s eligibility to hold office? Call me or look here and here.

Besides, seems to me FNC owes no allegiance to the White House any more. That should have stopped the day they declared war against your network.

BOTH INELIGIBLE

SHOCKING! MORE PROOF … MEMBERS OF CONGRESS ALWAYS KNEW OBAMA WAS INELIGIBLE FOR THE PRESIDENCY (UPDATED)

The work by Linda A. Melin, Citizen Researcher in her three part series, at Constitutionally Speaking is a must read.

The enormity of what took place in the 2008 election for President of the United States is both stunning and sobering. The reality is, not only did we have two candidates running for the office who were constitutionally ineligible to hold office as required under Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 (A2, S1, C5) of the Constitution, but in order for this to happen, high ranking officials in both the DNC and the RNC (whose job is to verify and certify the eligibility of their candidates to hold the office of POTUS) had to falsify and/or modify documents certifying their candidates eligibility to the 50 Secretarys of State.

I want you to go to Constitutionally Speaking (CS)… but not quite yet.

As I have written numerous times, most members of Congress (past and present), knew that Obama was constitutionally ineligible for the office of President and remained silent. The names include Barney Frank, Maxine Waters, Shelia Jackson Lee, Joe Scarborough, Ted Kennedy, Orrin Hatch… the list is endless. This is the dirty little secret known to most everyone in Washington, in the MSM, and in the legal community. It was purposely kept from the general public. Read here and here.

The CS series provides exhaustive details of Congress’ extensive knowledge & avoidance of the Natural Born Citizen clause of the Constitution. The mission of these legislators was simple … eliminate and destroy this clause that the Framers of our Republic felt so strongly about.

Make no mistake, electing an ineligible Obama was done with intentional malice leading to the destruction of the Constitution.

As law professor Peter J. Spiro made abundantly clear on the topic:

[...] “Constitutional questions do not require constitutional decisions. If non-judicial actors, including Congress (Frank, Hatch, Kennedy, Waters, Graham, McCaskill, Conyers), editorialists (NY Times, MSNBC, LA Times et. al.), leading members of the bar (Turley, Dean, Epstein, Toobin), and the People themselves (can you say Kool-Aid?)manage to generate a constitutional consensus, there isn’t much that the courts can do about it. In cases such as this one, at least, that seems to be an acceptable method of constitutional determination.

In other words, it is perfectly alright to ignore those parts of the Constitution you do not agree with. Just ignore what you don’t like and if others agree with you and/or conspire with you, why bother with legislation to change it?  What we have is de facto change we can believe in! mmm,mmm,mmm!

Stepping back to see where we’ve come from and where we are to today is warranted.

I began asking questions about Obama’s citizenship in August 2008, here and here as did others. The questions were simple enough, if Obama’s father was Kenyan how could Obama meet the natural born citizenship requirement for POTUS? His own website clearly stated that Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.’s children.

It seemed to be a simple question to me, one of extreme importance given the fact that if Obama was ineligible this country was embarked on electing a fraud. More importantly, as Dr. EdwinVieira detailed in October of 2008, if we elected Obama and he was found to be ineligible after the fact, every law passed, every appointment, etc, would be moot.

Certainly the MSM would jump to cover this story, right? Yet inexplicably, as we witnessed, they were either silent or they purposely mislead the public as to the true nature of the controversy. The question wasn’t whether Obama was a US citizen when he was elected, the question was and remains, what was Obama’s citizenship status on the day he was born; that is the primary question.

Legal analysts and JournoListers like Jeffery Toobin, lied and spread misinformation about the meaning of natural born citizenship as did other legal analysts on CNN. Jonathan (if you want a purebred, get a dog) Turley and John (the clause is pernicious) Dean both OPPONENTS of the natural born citizen clause were just as complicit remaining silent.

Then we had members of Congress, many who are attorneys themselves, who sat on committees bent on changing the NBC. Their intent was specific… obliterate the NBC clause and extend this very particular presidential requirement to virtually anyone that could chew gum and walk a straight line. They all remained silent, demonstrating once again that inactions can have consequences. As you will see in Constitutionally Speaking,Congress has been more active about subverting the NBC than even I had discovered. See here and here.

What we have seen in the last year and half is a multitude of public officials that either didn’t do their job (the New Jersey Secretary of State is the most egregious example. See Donofrio v. Wells), or who purposely lied, obfuscated, or ignored the underlying issues of Obama’s citizenship status. They put their politics and their grab for power ahead of our country.

Canada Free Press has reported on intimidation tactics used on the few reporters or media people willing to risk bringing the truth to light. We all know how Lou Dobbs was treated for merely questioning why Obama hasn’t produced records which verify his eligibility. It has been evident to anyone with half a brain that media personalities were instructed to avoid any discussion of the birth certificate issue at all costs.When Ann Coulter is saying “birthers” are crazy, someone is holding a very big stick, one few have the courage to mess with.

Also reported by J. B. Williams & CFP, are charges that high ranking Democratic party officials knew that Obama was not constitutionally eligible, that Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi knew that she was signing false statements when she was certifying his eligibility for the 50 states as required in the election process.

MCCAIN OBAMA

The truth is that in the 2008 election for POTUS neither John McCain or Barack Obama were eligible to hold the office of president. Donofrio was spot on with his law suit against the New Jersey Secretary of State.

Not only did she allow McCain and Obama’s names on the ballot without checking their citizenship status, but she also allowed Roger Calero, a man born in Nicaragua with a green card to to be placed on the ballot to run for President.

In the background, numerous law suits seeking information we are entitled to see have been ongoing and to no one’s surprise, under reported by the MSM. The sad reality is that not one case has been heard on its merits.

It started with Judge Surrick’s ruling in September of 2008. What Surrick said was that Berg’s case lacked standing and that voters weren’t personally harmed by a possibly ineligible Obama. Why? Because voters had a choice to vote for someone besides Obama in the national election. The problem with that argument is that if you were a Hillary supporter, your choice for president was taken away before the national election was held.

The truth is that the judiciary of this country has let its citizens down whether through cowardice or complicity, or ignorance. After all, what is left to say when Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg purposely chooses to ignore the NBC clause as it relates to her grandson? Is it any wonder that the Supreme Court declined to hear the Donofrio v Wells case?

Which leads us to today, Constitutionally Speaking, and part III in her series of subversion and malfeasance by the Congress of this United States which is slated for later today. We are promised even more explosive detailed information. Stay tuned!