Tag Archives: LEO DONOFRIO

ATTORNEY GENERAL KEN CUCCINELLIA SHOULDN’T BACK AWAY FROM OBAMA ELIGIBILITY QUESTIONS

The question is simple, one I have repeatedly asked since August of 2008.

Where in the Constitution does it state that a person who is born a dual citizen at the time of birth is allowed to run for the office of President of the United States?

Answer. Nowhere.

Dual citizens are not allowed to hold the highest office in the land.  The truth is that Obama has never been eligible to be POTUS.

He knows that, the MSM (including FOX) knows that, and so too a lengthy list of attorneys, talking heads, and legal scholars (Tobin, Turley, Dean et al) who wrap themselves in the Constitution when it suits their purposes.  Obama suited their purposes.   This group (which included Bill and Hillary haters) kicked the Constitution to the curb so they could move forward with their progressive agenda for changing America.

While questions revolving around his birthplace continue to swirl, it is his British/ dual citizenship at the time of his birth that automatically disqualified him from ever holding the highest office in the land, regardless of his having been born in Hawaii or Kenya.

All the concentration on Obama’s long form birth certificate has proved to be a handy bludgeoning tool used by the MSM.  Yell “Birther” and see how many politicians are willing to stand their ground.

For a moment let me lend some credibility to people who question Obama’s eligibility and remind you that when Hillary was running that Bill Clinton mentioned Obama’s eligibility, some would say, making him the First Birther!

Now comes the latest politician willing to talk about Obama’s eligibility … for a short time anyway until, predictably,  the Birther charge was hurled at Virginia Attorney General Cuccinellia.  The timing is very interesting because Obamacare is also front and center.

Just a reminder, if we are correct and Obama has always been ineligible to hold office then every piece of legislation, including TARP and the hated Health Care bill Team Obama is determined to ram down America’s throat, would be null … void of legal force!

This despised 3,000 page monstrosity of payoffs and kick-backs masquerading as legislation could not be law.  Remember this point as you look at this video.

Here’s another really good question.  If Pelosi, Reid, and the Democrats are determined to use any means possible to pass Obamacare, despite the fact that most of the citizens of this country DO NOT WANT THIS BILL TO PASS, how long do you think it will be before an Attorney General in one of the 50 states decides to challenge the bill as being unconstitutional on the grounds that Obama, born a British/dual citizen is not legitimately President?




O’REILLY & FOX NEWS CHALLENGED BY PLAINTIFF IN OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE LAWSUIT – GOING TO DISS ME? PUT UP OR SHUT UP!

Bill O´Reilly on TVThere is no shortage of irony here.

First, we have all heard O’Reilly pontificate that people were afraid to come on his show and spar with him because he is a simple man … a seeker of the truth.

{{ and the choir sang Amen}}

This song has been going on for years. Second, we have the recent White House war on FOX News ostensibly because FNC is supposed to be an extension of the Republican Part and the GOP.

One would never know that to be true given FNC’s phony coverage of Obama’s eligibility to be POTUS! You see, it has never been about just Obama’s birth certificate, it has always been about his citizenship status on the day he was born; O’Reilly and his pals knew that last night!

If you have been following the issues surrounding our faux President Obama (called that until he proves otherwise), you know that FOX has been as complicit at covering and obscuring the truth as the rest of quislings in the MSM. Obama and the White House should be counting their lucky stars that FOX hasn’t reported the truth to date.

That all changed last night when O’Reilly dissed plaintiff Captain Pamela Barnett as a disgruntled military person that didn’t want to be deployed as her reason for challenging Obama’s eligibility to hold the office of POTUS.

If you watched O’Reilly during his legal segment ( with two lawyers sitting across from him), you saw him continue the intentional and ongoing obfuscation of the real issues surrounding Obama as a natural born citizen as required by Article II Section 1 of the Constitution.

Much to my surprise, I just learned that Captain Barnett has issued the following challenge to the “Seeker of Truth O’Reilly”:

From Captain Pamela Barnett to Bill O’Reilly onOctober 28, 2009

I challenge you Mr. O’Reilly to interview me.

I am Captain Pamela Barnett U.S. Army Retired of Barnett v. Barack Obama.

I am sick and tired of you defaming our lawsuit and our attorney against the Resident in the White House Obama. 48 plaintiffs mostly military retired have brought this lawsuit to force the production of Obama’s vital records to determine if he is in fact a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN which is one of the requirements to be a legal POTUS and NOT an illegal USURPER. There is also a huge amount of information regarding fraud that Obama committed before being illegally sworn in as POTUS.

IF YOU CARE ABOUT THE TRUTH AT ALL.. YOU WILL CALL ME…

FROM WHAT I CAN SEE OF YOUR SHOW, THE TRUTH DOES NOT SEEM TO MATTER TO YOU OR THE REST OF THE SHILLS AT FOX. I KNOW THAT YOU ARE ONLY A COMMENTATOR, BUT AT LEAST GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT BEFORE HURTING OUR CASE AND PROPAGATING LIES TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.

Sincerely,

CPT Pamela Barnett, U.S.Army Retired

Memo to O’Reilly and FNC: Now its time to put up or shut up.

Are you going to cover the biggest story since Watergate or not? This story is NEVER going away and the millions of people following this will never let up. FNC can choose to be on the right side of history.

There is only one choice … put Captain Barnett on. If you don’t,  you will giving the world conclusive proof that both FNC and its talent know how to talk about being “Fair and Balanced” and little else! When the “Big O “opened his mouth last night and dissed Barnett, er attorney, and the millions of “birthers” who have been seeking the truth you put yourselves into a box!

While you are at it you should put Leo Donofrio and Mario Apuzzo on and a host of others can can bring real insight to the issues. Don’t know who should be part of FNC’s extensive coverage of the real issues surrounding Obama’s eligibility to hold office? Call me or look here and here.

Besides, seems to me FNC owes no allegiance to the White House any more. That should have stopped the day they declared war against your network.

BOTH INELIGIBLE

SHOCKING! MORE PROOF … MEMBERS OF CONGRESS ALWAYS KNEW OBAMA WAS INELIGIBLE FOR THE PRESIDENCY (UPDATED)

The work by Linda A. Melin, Citizen Researcher in her three part series, at Constitutionally Speaking is a must read.

The enormity of what took place in the 2008 election for President of the United States is both stunning and sobering. The reality is, not only did we have two candidates running for the office who were constitutionally ineligible to hold office as required under Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 (A2, S1, C5) of the Constitution, but in order for this to happen, high ranking officials in both the DNC and the RNC (whose job is to verify and certify the eligibility of their candidates to hold the office of POTUS) had to falsify and/or modify documents certifying their candidates eligibility to the 50 Secretarys of State.

I want you to go to Constitutionally Speaking (CS)… but not quite yet.

As I have written numerous times, most members of Congress (past and present), knew that Obama was constitutionally ineligible for the office of President and remained silent. The names include Barney Frank, Maxine Waters, Shelia Jackson Lee, Joe Scarborough, Ted Kennedy, Orrin Hatch… the list is endless. This is the dirty little secret known to most everyone in Washington, in the MSM, and in the legal community. It was purposely kept from the general public. Read here and here.

The CS series provides exhaustive details of Congress’ extensive knowledge & avoidance of the Natural Born Citizen clause of the Constitution. The mission of these legislators was simple … eliminate and destroy this clause that the Framers of our Republic felt so strongly about.

Make no mistake, electing an ineligible Obama was done with intentional malice leading to the destruction of the Constitution.

As law professor Peter J. Spiro made abundantly clear on the topic:

[...] “Constitutional questions do not require constitutional decisions. If non-judicial actors, including Congress (Frank, Hatch, Kennedy, Waters, Graham, McCaskill, Conyers), editorialists (NY Times, MSNBC, LA Times et. al.), leading members of the bar (Turley, Dean, Epstein, Toobin), and the People themselves (can you say Kool-Aid?)manage to generate a constitutional consensus, there isn’t much that the courts can do about it. In cases such as this one, at least, that seems to be an acceptable method of constitutional determination.

In other words, it is perfectly alright to ignore those parts of the Constitution you do not agree with. Just ignore what you don’t like and if others agree with you and/or conspire with you, why bother with legislation to change it?  What we have is de facto change we can believe in! mmm,mmm,mmm!

Stepping back to see where we’ve come from and where we are to today is warranted.

I began asking questions about Obama’s citizenship in August 2008, here and here as did others. The questions were simple enough, if Obama’s father was Kenyan how could Obama meet the natural born citizenship requirement for POTUS? His own website clearly stated that Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.’s children.

It seemed to be a simple question to me, one of extreme importance given the fact that if Obama was ineligible this country was embarked on electing a fraud. More importantly, as Dr. EdwinVieira detailed in October of 2008, if we elected Obama and he was found to be ineligible after the fact, every law passed, every appointment, etc, would be moot.

Certainly the MSM would jump to cover this story, right? Yet inexplicably, as we witnessed, they were either silent or they purposely mislead the public as to the true nature of the controversy. The question wasn’t whether Obama was a US citizen when he was elected, the question was and remains, what was Obama’s citizenship status on the day he was born; that is the primary question.

Legal analysts and JournoListers like Jeffery Toobin, lied and spread misinformation about the meaning of natural born citizenship as did other legal analysts on CNN. Jonathan (if you want a purebred, get a dog) Turley and John (the clause is pernicious) Dean both OPPONENTS of the natural born citizen clause were just as complicit remaining silent.

Then we had members of Congress, many who are attorneys themselves, who sat on committees bent on changing the NBC. Their intent was specific… obliterate the NBC clause and extend this very particular presidential requirement to virtually anyone that could chew gum and walk a straight line. They all remained silent, demonstrating once again that inactions can have consequences. As you will see in Constitutionally Speaking,Congress has been more active about subverting the NBC than even I had discovered. See here and here.

What we have seen in the last year and half is a multitude of public officials that either didn’t do their job (the New Jersey Secretary of State is the most egregious example. See Donofrio v. Wells), or who purposely lied, obfuscated, or ignored the underlying issues of Obama’s citizenship status. They put their politics and their grab for power ahead of our country.

Canada Free Press has reported on intimidation tactics used on the few reporters or media people willing to risk bringing the truth to light. We all know how Lou Dobbs was treated for merely questioning why Obama hasn’t produced records which verify his eligibility. It has been evident to anyone with half a brain that media personalities were instructed to avoid any discussion of the birth certificate issue at all costs.When Ann Coulter is saying “birthers” are crazy, someone is holding a very big stick, one few have the courage to mess with.

Also reported by J. B. Williams & CFP, are charges that high ranking Democratic party officials knew that Obama was not constitutionally eligible, that Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi knew that she was signing false statements when she was certifying his eligibility for the 50 states as required in the election process.

MCCAIN OBAMA

The truth is that in the 2008 election for POTUS neither John McCain or Barack Obama were eligible to hold the office of president. Donofrio was spot on with his law suit against the New Jersey Secretary of State.

Not only did she allow McCain and Obama’s names on the ballot without checking their citizenship status, but she also allowed Roger Calero, a man born in Nicaragua with a green card to to be placed on the ballot to run for President.

In the background, numerous law suits seeking information we are entitled to see have been ongoing and to no one’s surprise, under reported by the MSM. The sad reality is that not one case has been heard on its merits.

It started with Judge Surrick’s ruling in September of 2008. What Surrick said was that Berg’s case lacked standing and that voters weren’t personally harmed by a possibly ineligible Obama. Why? Because voters had a choice to vote for someone besides Obama in the national election. The problem with that argument is that if you were a Hillary supporter, your choice for president was taken away before the national election was held.

The truth is that the judiciary of this country has let its citizens down whether through cowardice or complicity, or ignorance. After all, what is left to say when Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg purposely chooses to ignore the NBC clause as it relates to her grandson? Is it any wonder that the Supreme Court declined to hear the Donofrio v Wells case?

Which leads us to today, Constitutionally Speaking, and part III in her series of subversion and malfeasance by the Congress of this United States which is slated for later today. We are promised even more explosive detailed information. Stay tuned!


OBAMA IS 52 YEARS OLD NOT 48 … STOP THE PRESSES! SO HIS CITIZENSHIP PROBLEMS ARE OVER, RIGHT?

OK, this is too funny and too silly even for the Obots in the O’white House.

Hat/tip to Repubx for noticing that the Dear One’s age on his MySpace page is listed as 52 and not 48…. wait let me get my calculator out and check.  OBAMA

Hmmm it says here in his book he was born in 1961(click, tap, click  sound calculator keys being depressed)hmmm if we subtract 1961 from 2009 or the year of our Dear One’s Ascension (click, click) Nope, he’s 48.

I mean really… what are they smoking in the White House? Who dreamed this one up; the same guy that thinks there are 52 states; or was it 57? No, no, no that’s ketchup! Speaking of ketchup anyone hear Kerry’s droning voice lately? Is that guy still alive?

(Opps, I got off point for minute.) I know it’s the guy that put the phony Obama birth certificate together the one that lists Obama’s father race as African? Guess this Mensa wannabe doesn’t know Africa is a continent, that African isn’t a race, and that in 1961 the operative descriptor would have been Negro.

Now why would this merit a second of my time and your time? Let’s try this out. If Obama were 52 that would mean when he was born, Hawaii was a territory and so in this bizarre scenario that would make him a natural born citizen. Right?

Wrong, DUMBASS (I’m channeling Jeff Dunham’s Walter). Using the Hawaii was a US territory theme puts Obama in the same problematic situation as McCain, Romney, and Goldwater … minus the British/Kenyan father of course! If I remember correctly, none of them were eligible to run for POTUS. Ya but, McCain ran for POTUS, and what about  Senate Resolution 511 didn’t the Congress declare McCain was a natural born citizen?

Well, Resolution 511 was an obvious attempt to by pass Article II Section 1 of the Constitution… and it wasn’t/isn’t legally binding. It it is equivalent of declaring everyone is Irish on St. Patrick’s Day. The truth is Congress and the legal community has been looking for ways to by-pass the natural born citizen clause for years.

There are scores of politicians and lawyers who think the clause should be changed, but rather than do the heavy lifting… that’s passing a Constitutional Amendment and that requires that three quarters of the states are in agreement with the change. The LA Times is on record as saying the the NBC clause should be amended. I would venture to say that this one of the reasons they refuse to report on Obama’s problems of ineligibility for POTUS.

Both Republicans and Democrats are guilty! One only has to look to as far back as 2004 when the Republicans were trying some slight of hand of their own so they could advance the career of Arnold my father was in the SS Schwarzenegger. BTW, did you know Arnold is a dual citizen? Hmmm, thought not.

If you want to look at guilty Democrats go back to 2001 and look at Barney Frank’s attempt to change the NBC clause with H.J.Res. 88. I’d look at it quickly before all traces are scrubbed.

Oh, before I forget. Did you know that Walter was going to run for President? Yes, that Walter. I say anyone that once described the letters in NBC Network as standing for “Nothing But Crap deserves my vote!

OBAMA’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE & ELIGIBILITY FOR POTUS – WHAT LAWMAKERS NEED TO KNOW BEFORE RETURNING HOME IN AUGUST (Part Two)

When this has finally played itself out, I think we’ll find that the Obama birth certificate issue has been a brillant con job used to deflect attention from the real issues of Obama’s eligibility to hold the office of POTUS.  Whether Obama was born in Hawaii or Kenya, IT DOESN’T MATTER. The same is true of his mother’s citizenship.

As I said yesterday,I don’t blame lawmakers for wanting to dodge reporters when asked about Obama’s eligibility to hold the office of president.  There is no reason to duck the questions.  Armed with the following information, lawmakers should seek out the MSM and ask why they haven’t done their job.

Is Barack Obama a “natural born citizen” as required under our Constitution?

NO. For a fuller explanation here:

Natural born citizenship status in a nation is granted by the facts of nature of your birth. No law or statute is necessary to grant it. The nations can make any law they wish to make a person a citizen at birth or later. But natural born citizenship can only be conveyed by nature by the facts at birth of the child. If you are born in the country of two citizen parents you are “naturally” … a “natural born citizen” … a citizen too … but a specific kind of citizen who is eligible to be the President and Commander-in-Chief of our military since the child when born has sole allegiance to this country and there is no claim on him/her by a foreign country or power as to their citizenship at birth by that country too. Natural born citizens have unity of citizenship at birth. A natural born citizen is NOT a dual citizen at birth. A natural born citizen has no divided loyalty issues by his birth since the child was born in the country to two citizens of the country

Has Barack Obama ever been eligible to hold office?

NO, but the answer has less to do with his birth certificate than with the status of his citizenship at the time of his birth. The birth certificate has become a ( purposeful) distraction for the larger issues surrounding Obama and the presidency. Obama’s Kenyan father was a British national who passed his citizenship to his son.  His mother could not automatically pass her citizenship to Obama because she was underage at the time of his birth. There is a very strong legal argument to be made that Obama was born a British citizen.

FactCheck.org Clarifies Barack’s Citizenship

“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.

Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.”

Does it matter if he was born in Hawaii or Kenya?

NO, Hawaii or Kenya, it doesn’t matter!   What matters is his citizenship status on August 4, 1961.  Whether he was legally born a British citizen or with dual citizenship, either automatically disqualifies him for POTUS.  For people who are ignorant of the real issues, it is easy to say he was born in Hawaii and that his mother was a U.S. citizen and to dismiss this as racist, Republican, wingnut propaganda.  It doesn’t change the facts.

Has this country ever had a President that is a dual citizen?

NO.

Is Obama a U.S. citizen?

YES … maybe, but not a natural born citizen.  Since he and his legal team haven’t released a single record that buttresses his claim, it is hard to know conclusively. It is possible that he is a naturalized citizen? Yes, but his citizenship claim is complicated by the fact that his mother renounced her citizenship when she married her second husband, Lolo Soetoro and moved to Indonesia.  Her renunciation of U.S. citizenship impacted on Obama’s citizenship status.

Is seeing the long form of his birth certificate important?

YES, but not necessarily to determine if he was born in the United States. The Constitution requires that a candidate running for office of the President be a natural born citizen…not a naturalized citizen, or native born citizen, or dual citizen.  Obama’s own website acknowledges that his citizenship was governed by the British Nationality Act of 1948.

But the MSM keeps saying he’s a citizen and he was born in Hawaii … and what about the birth announcements and the birth certificate that I’ve seen?

IT DOESN’T MATTER! Let me say it again, what matters is Obama’s citizenship status the moment he was born.  Everything else is secondary.  The story provides plausible cover but it is a very small part of the seminal issues surrounding Obama’s citizenship.  Anyone can place an announcement in the newspaper.  The act of placing an announcement in a newspaper proves nothing.  The “birth certificate” is a phony AND probably inadmissible in a court of law!

Even if Obama were to release the vault copy of his birth certificate it doesn’t change the fact that his citizenship was governed by the British Nationality Act of 1948.  He’s a Brit!

OBAMA’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE – WHAT LAWMAKERS NEED TO KNOW BEFORE THE AUGUST RECESS– WHAT THE MSM REFUSES TO REPORT – (Part One)

I don’t blame lawmakers for wanting to dodge reporters when asked about Obama’s eligibility to hold the office of president. The way the MSM has intentionally marginalized, and narrowly defined the issues there is reason to be fearful without the facts.

From now on you don’t have to duck the questions. Once you are armed with the following you should seek out the MSM and ask why they haven’t done their job.

First and foremost, those of us who now number in the hundred of thousands are not “birthers” the pejorative term used by the MSM to ridicule our efforts to get to the truth. We are patriots. Those defending Team Obama’s actions are either parrots, pawns, or fools. This is not an issue of the extreme right wing of the Republican party. We come from diverse backgrounds, we are black, white, brown, independents, conservatives, former Democrats AND MORE. We are not racists, the now overly used political assisins bomb, hurled to make people duck and run.

Why is this issue so important? Because if the natural born citizen clause of the Constitution is not upheld, anyone including a foreign national could run for office? Before you say that couldn’t happen, it already has… just ask Roger Calero.

Who is Roger Calero? Calero was born in Nicaragua and one of the leaders of the Socialist Workers Party. His name appeared on the presidential ballots in New Jersey, Delaware, Minnesota, New York and Vermont. He isn’t a natural born citizen or even a naturalized citizen. Calero is a permanent resident alien with a green card yet he was certificed to run. When Leo Donofrio sued the New Jersey Secretary of State it was because she allowed Obama, McCain (with his own natural born citizenship probems) and Calero to run without verifing their eligibilty.

If Obama’s natural born citizenship isn’t validated, precedence will have been set that will allow future candidates to ignore this Constitutional requirement. Governor Schwarzenegger could become President even though he was born in Germany. This is a sneaky way to sidestep the Constitution. This is why Chris Matthews and a host of others over at MSNBC, CNN, etc. don’t want new legislation introduced that would require future candidates to provide conclusive proof that they are natural born citizens. Should this escape anyone’s attention, that would also mean Obama running for a second term!

There are a host of lawmakers and attorneys (Jonathan Turley and John Dean) who are well versed in this topic & who have chosen to look the other way because they believe the natural born citizen clause is no longer necessary. Rather than do the hard work and pass a Constitutional amendment, they remain silent on this issue. Congresss hasn’t been silent on this issue.  Just look at House Resolution 88 and CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT TO ALLOW FOREIGN-BORN CITIZENS TO BE PRESIDENT and the hearing before the subcommittee on the Constitution of the One Hundred and Sixth Congress.

Why this needs to be resolved before another piece of legislation is passed if Obama is ineligible then nothing in his Administration is legally binding, his cabinet appointments, his czars, all legislation including the $787 billion dollar stimulus bill. That means Geithner is gone, Gibbs gone, Biden gone … I don’t have to go on and on, do I? No wonder Roland Martin got hysterical on Lou Dobbs the other night. He knows it’s over and saying its too late because Obama is already President is flat out wrong!

Was Obama born in Hawaii? Maybe, but it doesn’t matter because his citizenship status at the time of his birth was British. His Kenyan father was a British national whose citizenship was passed onto to son. His mother was too young to pass her citizenship onto her child because she was underage at the time. Is Barack a citizen today, after all his mother was born in the US.  The answer is maybe, but even if it is a resounding YES, the best case scenario for him is he was born with dual citizenship and that disqualifies him. PERIOD!

What’s so important about being a natural born citizen? This is from Constitutionally Speaking:

Historical Fact #3: Additionally, in 1800, Charles Pinckney ( Continental Congress (1777-78 and 1784-87) and S.C. state legislature (1779-80, 1786-89, and 1792-96) said the presidential eligibility clause was designed to insure…attachment to the country:

“What better way to insure attachment to the country than to require the President to have his American citizenship through his American Father and not through a foreign father. Any child can be born anywhere in the country and be removed by their father to be raised in his native country. The risks would be for the child to return later in life to reside in this country bringing with him foreign influences and intrigues.”

As Leo Donfrio said on his blog this morning, our Founding Fathers set a higher standard of citizenship in order to become POTUS. Natural born citizenship is a higher form of citizenship and it is different from being a naturalized citizen or a dual citizen.

The following is from outside the country and Canada Free Press, since we cannot rely on the MSM to tell us the truth:

By JB Williams Wednesday, June 10, 2009

I can’t remember any time in my life when more was at stake.

In the end, it all comes down to the U.S.Constitution. It either stands as written and ratified, or it is a meaningless piece of paper of no use to any American ever again.This is the Constitutional Crisis so many worried about when Obama chose to seek an office he refused to demonstrate his eligibility for. It should have never been allowed to happen.

MSNBC MAKES A MOCKERY OF OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE COVERAGE… LIES TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC

Listen to what the MSM and pro Obama sites are NOT saying when they “report” on Obama’s birth certificate.

 

Any media source that reports on the Obama birth certificate story and doesn’t include a discussion of  the Constitutional requirements to hold the office of POTUS, the term natural born citizen, or dual citizenship is trying to skirt the real underlying issues of Obama’s nationality at the time of his birth. They are lying to you and blowing smoke.

 

If you are new to the Obama birth certificate controversy … more accurately stated the Obama Constitutional crisis controversy, here’s what MSNBC hasn’t reported in the last 24 hours, despite their frantic efforts to dismiss, destroy, marginalize, and otherwise discredit anyone with the temerity to question Obama’s eligibility to hold office.

These are the real issues:

 

There is a Constitutional requirement that anyone running to hold the office of POTUS must be a “natural born citizen” … not a naturalized citizen, not a native-born citizen, not a person with dual citizenship … the requirement is for a natural born citizen.  A natural born citizen is not the same as a native born citizen, or a naturalized citizen.

 

In order to be a natural born citizen, BOTH parents must be U.S. citizens;  therefore it doesn’t matter if Obama was born in Hawaii, Kenya, Timbuktu, Canada, the moon, BOTH PARENTS HAD TO BE U.S. CITIZENS AT THE TIME OF HIS BIRTH FOR OBAMA TO QUALIFY FOR PRESIDENT.

 

The reason the Founders of our country made this distinction was because they feared a person born without this requirement might be subject to divided loyalties and thus be in a position to undermine or destroy the Republic (democracy is an inaccurate term here) they fought and died for.

 

 

This is from a 2004 NY Times article written prior to Obama’s ascent to the Presidency:

[...]

The Constitution’s framers chose the term “natural born” not only to highlight the need for allegiance, but also to eliminate the possibility that foreigners could exert power over the fledgling government, according to constitutional experts.

 

When Obama was born, his Kenyan father was a British national, a fact acknowledged by Team Obama. However, because his mother was underage at the time of his birth, it was his father’s nationality that was passed onto Obama not his mother’s despite the fact that she was a U.S. citizen.

 

You should also know that it has been widely reported that Obama has spent over $950,000.00 with eleven different law firms blocking access to ALL records (birth certificate, college transcripts, health records, passport records, etc.) that would verify his eligibility to serve as president.

 

 

Obama’s first act upon entering the White House was to issue Executive Order 13489 blocking access to his records!

CNN COVERS OBAMA’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE ISSUES … SORT OF!

Well, the cable networks are finally giving the Obama birth certificate/natural born citizen issues some air time.  Right?  Well, not exactly.

Last week the words “Obama, ineligible to be president, and birth certificate” were spoken over at FOX and at CNN.  The Lou Dobbs radio show devoted a significant amount of time to the topic and asked the question we have been asking for months, “Why not release the darn birth certificate?”    No need to ask that question anymore.  It hasn’t been released because it has information on it that would prove Obama has no right to be called President.

The Dobbs radio show was in sharp contrast to the televised segment hosed by Kitty Pilgrim.  Instead of giving us honest reporting, most of the FACEOFF segment was spent defending Obama and trying to “debunk” the legitimate issues surrounding Obama’s refusal to produce ANY documents supporting his claim to American citizenship.

It appears the only reason CNN focused on the ongoing issues surrounding Obama’s birth certificate was to take issue with Dr. Orly Taitz and Alan Keyes and to make them look foolish.  The CNN segment ran 6:45; of which more than 3 minutes were spent defending Obama’s phony COLB (certificate of live birth).  Using Annenberg’s Fact Check and two announcements of Obama’s birth in Hawaiian newspapers to buttress the claims that this story has been “thoroughly investigated” and reported, Pilgrim sucked up air time and droned on and on.  It wasn’t until the last 30 seconds of the segment that Taitz had time to mention Obama’s dual citizenship,  and that was virtually drown out as the segment was fast coming to a close.

Watch the video and ask yourself if you think Obama’s ineligibility to serve as POTUS was given a fair hearing.

Here’s the ongoing major problem with most of the focus on Obama’s birth certificate. The focus on the birth certificate has obscured the larger issues with Obama’s claim to US citizenship. The MSM’s “analysis” of Obama’s Hawaiian/Kenyan birth never gets  any further than his mother was a citizen of this country.  Those who want to silent us use, “She was an American citizen, case closed.”  In truth, I’ll bet you couldn’t find two “reporters” in the MSM who could give an explanation of the differences between a citizen, a natural born citizen, a naturalized citizen.

As Leo Donfrio (Donfrio v. Wells) has said numerous times and in various ways:

It’s obvious that the framers drew a distinction between the meaning of “citizen” and the meaning of “natural born citizen”.  A “citizen” can be Senator or Representative, but in order to be President one must be a natural born citizen.

In order to be a natural born citizen BOTH parents have to citizens of this country.  Team Obama has embraced his father’s nationality.  This cannot be side stepped.   That means the best case scenario for Obama is he was born with dual citizenship.  The Constitution does not allow for our country’s President to hold dual citizenship.

In reality, there is a strong legal case to be made that Obama was born a British citizen. Obama’s father was born in Kenya and was a British citizen at the time BHO was born.  Because his mother was too young enough to confer her citizenship to Obama, it was Obama’s father’s nationality that was passed onto Obama. This is a FACT, end of story.

Again, from Donofrio:

[...]

It’s the difference between a fact and a legal status.

Whether you are a natural born citizen is a fact of nature which can’t be waived or renounced, but your actual legal citizenship can be renounced.  The difference is subtle, but so very important.  “Natural born citizen” is not a different form of “citizenship”.  It is a manner of acquiring citizenship.  And while natural born citizens may end their legal tie to the country by renouncing citizenship, they will always have been naturally born into that nation as a citizen.

Although this has been stated elsewhere, this comment  from Watching the Nation succinctly states the legal status of Obama:

According to common law and Vattel (mentioned above) it seems the term “natural born” was and is and has always been understood to mean born to parents who are citizens (with an s)  (and with emphasis on the father) of the United States.

What we have in our current president is a man who is the child of a British national.

Whether Obama was born in Hawaii, or Kenya, or Timbuktu, doesn’t matter one whit.  His father’s nationality was passed on to him, thus making Obama ineligible to be President of the United States!

TO THE INTERNATIONAL MEDIA – A PRETEND PRESIDENT OBAMA PLACES THE CITIZENS OF THE WORLD IN PERIL

Memo: To the International Media

Re: Constitutional Crisis/President Elect Obama not Eligible to Serve as United States President

Date: January 14, 2009

In one week, Barack Obama will place his hand on the Lincoln bible to be sworn in as the 44th President of the United States (POTUS). When he places his hand on the Lincoln bible and swears to uphold the Constitution of the United States he may knowingly be committing fraud and usurping the most powerful office in the world.

The United States of America is faced with a Constitutional crisis of gigantic proportions; one that remains avoidable if Obama would simply release the growing list of documents that would verify that he indeed is a natural born citizen, a requirement for office of POTUS under the U.S. Constitution. Most of the people in our country and the world do not know what is happening because the mainstream media in our country has failed to do their jobs. The MSM have steadfastly refused to investigate any story that possibly reflects in a negative manner on Obama’s candidacy and his eligibility under the Constitution.

Outlets one would think would at least give the story a cursory glance like FOX News and the Drudge Report have remained conspicuously silent. The cable networks, venerable institutions like the New York Times and the Washington Post having been playing a game of “if we don’t report it, it doesn’t exist!”

obamacolblockkey3

 

Our Constitution requires that any person running for the office of president meet three qualifications; he/she must be at least 35 years of age, must live in the United States for at least 14 years and be a natural-born citizen. Mr. Obama has refused to provide any information that verifies he meets this requirement. In fact, it has been reported that Obama and his legal teams have spent close to one million dollars to keep his birth certificate and the truth hidden. A partial list of hidden Obama documents include; a vault copy of his birth certificate (under seal in Hawaii), college records, copy of his college thesis, records of his clients when practicing law in Illinois, explanation of his travel to Indonesia when Americans were not allowed to travel there, etc.

Mr. Obama’s own website states he was born with dual citizenship; that is an automatic disqualification. Actually, his citizenship was determined by his father who was Kenyon and a British citizen. Since his mother was 17 (and under age) her citizenship could not be passed to Obama at the time of his birth.

Further complicating the situation is Obama’s step-father was Indonesian. The evidence (that hasn’t been scrubbed from the Internet) shows that Obama went to school in Indonesia at a time when only Indonesian citizens were allowed this privilege and further that Obama traveled to Indonesia in the 80’s when American citizens were not allowed to travel to this country. What this means is that under this story of who Obama’s birth father was, he is not a “natural born citizen” as defined by our Constitution (born on U.S. soil of two parents both of whom are U.S. citizens) and therefore ineligible to hold the office of POTUS.

The reason why you should care should be self-evident. It has been said that when American catches a cold the rest of the world should watch out for pneumonia. The world wide financial recession is a case in point. If it is discovered that Mr. Obama was never eligible to run and hold the office of POTUS we, our country and the interconnected world, will be thrown in a state of disorder and turmoil. That is because any law, any treaty, any action taken under the Obama administration would be illegal. For a further explanation see Dr. Edwin Vieira detailed analysis.

 

There are (over 17) lawsuits that have already been brought across the country including several before the Supreme Court; all dismissed thus far on legal issues of standing and the like, but not on the merits of the lawsuits! See Donofrio v Wells, Berg v Obama, Kerchner v Obama & Congress for the most prominent lawsuits.

 

Let me point out that while the MSM in this country have abdicated its responsibility to voters here and Obama supporters abroad, the blogs on the Internet have been tracking this for months. Those blogging are not on the fringes or carry any animus towards Obama. There are thousands and thousands of us who love our country and are simply asking for the truth. We are moderates, former Obama supporters, conservatives, independents, Democrats, Republicans, and persons of every stripe who believe in placing our country before any individual man or party.

Finally, it should be noted that there have been a few stories written by sources outside the U.S. in Canada and elsewhere asking about Obama’s eligibility. The most disturbing is a recent article that appeared in Pravda RU which detailed Obama’s problems and which called him an outright fraud and which leads me to the most serious consideration. It is an embarrassment that Pravda is covering what our own media has purposely ignored.

Quoting from Dr. Vieira:

Fifth, as nothing but an usurper (if he becomes one), Obama will have no conceivable authority to make Treaties, or to nominate, and appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the Supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not otherwise provided for in the Constitution (Article II, Section 2, Clause 2). And therefore any Treaties or nominations and appointments he purports to make will be void ab initio, no matter what the Senate does, because the Senate can neither authorize an usurper to take such actions in the first place, nor thereafter ratify them.

Sixth, and perhaps most importantly, Congress can pass no law while an usurper pretends to occupy the Office of President. The Constitution provides that every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States (Article I, Section 7, Clause 2). Not to an usurper posturing as the President of the United States, but to the true and rightful President. If no such true and rightful President occupies the White House, no Bill will or can, before it become a Law, be presented to him. If no Bill is so presented, no Bill will or can become a Law. And any purported Law that the usurper approves and signs or that Congress passes over the usurper’s Objections, will be a nullity. Thus, if Obama deceitfully enters office as an usurper, Congress will be rendered effectively impotent for as long as it acquiesces in his pretenses as President.

If Pravda RU is calling Obama a fraud before his inauguration, how long before enemies of this country figure out this can be used as a reason not to cooperate with the U.S. or sign a treaty, or do anything that moves negotiations forward on any front because an illegally elected/ineligible Obama’s actions would be null and void . . . unenforceable . . . worthless. How long before Iran, or Hamas, or Russia, for that matter, figures this out and refuses to deal with the U.S.because of the Pretend President?

All of our institutions, have let us down. We are all in peril until this has been straightened out!

NOT ANOTHER BERG V. OBAMA UPDATE – OPPOSING VIEWS – NEW INFO

When I first brought the What’s Your Evidence site to your attention, I did so because unlike most of the MSM, I felt it was important to show an opposing view and let you the reader decide for yourself. I received a message from Ron Polarik, the man who has shown through extensive research, that the Obama COLB is a phony . . . a very bad one, at that. His message was that he has debunked the WHATS YOUR EVIDENCE site.

You can read his information here. Below is a snippet from his blog, The Greater Evil, at Townhall.com.

WHATSYOUREVIDENCE.COM: Nothing like the truth
Posted by Polarik on Thursday, October 30, 2008 8:53:55 PM

WHATSYOUREVIDENCE.COM: The TRUTH, the WHOLE TRUTH, and NOTHING LIKE the TRUTH!

Overview

This is the follow-up to my last post, WHATSYOUREVIDENCE: Retractions and Restatements, and contains all of the information that appeared in my original post, WHATSYOURSHYSTER, except for deleting two statements that were in error, and replacing a few words that were not appropriate. It is no longer a secret to FReepers that Ms. Teresa La Loggia is the owner and operator of the website, WHATSYOUREVIDENCE.COM. However, even after I outted her in my first post (and second post), and even after she wrote her “cease and desist” letter, Teresa La Loggia is still keeping her identity hidden from the public. This fact begs the question, “How much of her indignation was due to my statements incorrectly linking herself and her law firm to the Obama/DNC defense team, and how much of it was due to identity being discovered?”

After reading this post, and especially her letter, I’ll let you be the judge.