Tag Archives: Kerchner v. Obama

Bill Clinton & Ed Rendell fall on their swords for Poseur Obama and Sestakgate

Talk has always been cheap, a concept Team Obama has never fully understood. They were going to be different … yes-sir-ee!

Our Poseur President and the fools who engineered his fraudulent election are now faced with a new reality.   The Sestak bribe is one bribe that isn’t going away. The uproar, the comparisons with Watergate, all are staying around,  and just like the BP oil spill, this is impossible to hide.

Let’s start by asking a few rhetorical questions that we already know the answers to.

1.  If all of this were just noise and “inside Washington” politics, after weeks of stonewalling,  why did Team Obama’s surrogate, White House Counsel Robert Bauer,  make the announcement on the Friday afternoon of the Memorial Day weekend?

We all know the answer … because this is a big deal!  Team Obama broke the law big time.  What we have here, as the New York Times describes it here,

is a prima facie case of an attempted quid pro quo in violation of federal statute 18 U.S.C. 600 –  a promise of an appointment to an Executive Branch position in return for the political act by Sestak to drop his primary challenge and pave the way for Specter’s nomination by the Democratic Party establishment.

It’s my guess that they thought they were going to get away with it, the way that have so many other questionable and downright illegal activities.  Let’s be real, if Team Obama could put an Constitutionally ineligible fraud in the White House, what the hell was the big deal about another bribe? Right?

2.  Are we really to believe that after months of Sestak stating he had been offered a high government position if he dropped out of the PA primaries, that the best response Brand Obama could come up with was ”Barack didn’t do it, it was Bill?”  Really?  Oh, and BTW, it wasn’t a paid high level position it was an unpaid position on some obscure committee.  Oh ya,  ‘this is really  believable”, she said with as much sarcasm as she could muster!

3.  If the Sestak offer was “no big deal” why was the Big Dawg Bill Clinton called in?  This story smells to high heaven.  Who wants to take bets that there wasn’t a Bill Clinton phone call to Sestak and if there was,  the REAL story wasn’t given out to MSM on Friday.  Sorry this is too cute by half and way too convenient!

4.  Let’s assume for a moment that “everyone in Washington does business this way!”  Is this a reason proffered for felony behavior? Everyone does it.  The other night I heard the Governor of Pennsylvania, Ed Rendell, say he had offered up bribes as well!  Really? How much Kool-Aid do you think he drank before going on FOX?

5.  Here’s another explanation of why the Team Obama states the Sestak bribery revelations are no big deal.  Yes, there is a law (actually there are three, 18 U.S.C. § 600, 211, and 595) against promising something of value in exchange for a political appointment, but the law has never been enforced!  Well, there you go … the law has never been enforced so Team Obama gets to play fast and loose!

Yes, boys ‘n girls what we have here is more selective adherence to the rule of law and to the Constitution. We now get to pick and choose those laws we like and have decided to follow.

For a complete timeline of the events of the Sestak bribe and the White House cover-up check out this 75% snark free site here!

WHY DOES THE MSM REFUSE TO BELIEVE MICHELLE OBAMA WHEN SHE SAYS BARACK WAS BORN A KENYAN?

(H/T Repubx)

During a December 2007 speech in Tampa Florida, Michelle Obama stated, “What it reminded me of was our trip to Africa, two years ago, and the level of excitement that we felt in that country – the hope that people saw just in the sheer presence of somebody like Barack Obama – a Kenyan, a black man, a man of great statesmanship who they believe could change the fate of the world.”

The comment is made after the 2 minute mark. Watch the clip below.

FRACTURED FAIRY TALES, OBAMA’S ELIGIBILITY TO BE PRESIDENT & OTHER “BIRTHER” MYTHS

Who are the truth tellers?

If the MSM were to be believed, there is a fringe element of white racists, looney tunes, and assorted miscreants  that believe Obama was born in Kenya … and absent that, he isn’t even a citizen of this country.  “Not so!” they proclaim as they make light of and disparage those who insist that Obama needs to prove his eligibility to hold office.
And so, we have a parade of journalists and media personalities that continue to make fools of themselves, spouting the party line that Obama is a citizen and therefore eligible to hold office.  In addition to the usual smirking suck-ups at MSNBC, the lineup of media fools also includes Bill O’Reilly and Megan Kelly on FOX (and others).

Their recent analysis of Obama’s citizenship and how it was relates to army Lt. Col. Lakin’s refusal to deploy to Afghanistan, was as embarrassing as it was silly.
Not be outdone on the perpetuation of fables and myths , CBS recently regurgitated this:

Although the Constitution requires American presidents to be natural born citizens, as many as 30 percent of Tea Partiers say they think President Obama was born in another country, according to a new CBS News/ New York Times poll. More Tea Partiers, however, at 41 percent, say he was born in the U.S.

The so-called “birther movement,” questioning Mr. Obama’s origins, began during his presidential campaign. It has steadily persisted through Mr. Obama’s presidency, in spite of overwhelming evidence he was born in the United States — including his 1961 birth announcement, printed in two Hawaii newspapers. (What a joke! There isn’t overwhelming proof … andthe birth announcements are meaningless!)

The myth persists among the larger American population, but to a lesser degree, according to the poll, conducted April 5 – 12. Thirty-two percent of Republicans think the president was born in another country.  Among Americans overall, 58 percent think Mr. Obama was born in this country, while 20 percent say he was born elsewhere. Significant percentages aren’t sure or don’t have an opinion.

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton,Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Here’s what the MSM filters out from the general public:

  • Whether Obama was born in Hawaii or Kenya is immaterial because at the time of Obama’s birth, his father was a British citizen and his mother was too young to pass citizenship on to her son, making Obama a British citizen when he was born.

This is from Accuracy in Media:

In 1961, if a 17-year-old American female gave birth in a foreign country to a child whose father was not a U.S. citizen, that child had no right to any American citizenship, let alone the “natural born” citizenship that qualifies someone for the Presidency under Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution. In 1961, the year of Obama’s birth, under Sec. 301 (a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, Ann Dunham could not transmit citizenship of any kind to her son.

  • Even if there is a case for Obama’s dual citizenship when he was born, the Constitution does not allow for a person with dual citizenship to hold the office of POTUS.
  • Even if Obama could prove his citizenship today as a naturalized citizen, that does not make him a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.
  • There are lawsuits that are quietly going forward in the courts that challenge Obama to prove his citizenship as required by the Constitution
  • The constant mention of the  birth announcements in Hawaiian newspapers ARE NOT PROOF that Obama was born in the US.  In fact, they couldn’t be used in a court because they do not meet the minimum standards of proof!
  • The consequences of Obama assuming the office of President knowing he was ineligible are very serious!  They are equally serious for those who knowingly assisted Obama get “elected” to office … that includes Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and Howard Dean (to name a few!)
  • Those in the military who have chosen to challenge Obama’s eligibility are heroes who have an obligation to challenge ORDERS THAT THEY BELIEVE TO BE UNLAWFUL!
  • There is mounting evidence that Obama was, indeed born in Kenya.  In just the last two weeks there have been numerous detailed stories from Kenyan officials saying without equivocation that BHO was born a Kenyan (British) citizen.  They can be read here and here
  • Obama has blocked all access to his every one of his records, including college and university records, health records, copies of his thesis, etc. and is reported to have spent $2 million in order to suppress the truth about his eligibility!

ATTORNEY GENERAL KEN CUCCINELLIA SHOULDN’T BACK AWAY FROM OBAMA ELIGIBILITY QUESTIONS

The question is simple, one I have repeatedly asked since August of 2008.

Where in the Constitution does it state that a person who is born a dual citizen at the time of birth is allowed to run for the office of President of the United States?

Answer. Nowhere.

Dual citizens are not allowed to hold the highest office in the land.  The truth is that Obama has never been eligible to be POTUS.

He knows that, the MSM (including FOX) knows that, and so too a lengthy list of attorneys, talking heads, and legal scholars (Tobin, Turley, Dean et al) who wrap themselves in the Constitution when it suits their purposes.  Obama suited their purposes.   This group (which included Bill and Hillary haters) kicked the Constitution to the curb so they could move forward with their progressive agenda for changing America.

While questions revolving around his birthplace continue to swirl, it is his British/ dual citizenship at the time of his birth that automatically disqualified him from ever holding the highest office in the land, regardless of his having been born in Hawaii or Kenya.

All the concentration on Obama’s long form birth certificate has proved to be a handy bludgeoning tool used by the MSM.  Yell “Birther” and see how many politicians are willing to stand their ground.

For a moment let me lend some credibility to people who question Obama’s eligibility and remind you that when Hillary was running that Bill Clinton mentioned Obama’s eligibility, some would say, making him the First Birther!

Now comes the latest politician willing to talk about Obama’s eligibility … for a short time anyway until, predictably,  the Birther charge was hurled at Virginia Attorney General Cuccinellia.  The timing is very interesting because Obamacare is also front and center.

Just a reminder, if we are correct and Obama has always been ineligible to hold office then every piece of legislation, including TARP and the hated Health Care bill Team Obama is determined to ram down America’s throat, would be null … void of legal force!

This despised 3,000 page monstrosity of payoffs and kick-backs masquerading as legislation could not be law.  Remember this point as you look at this video.

Here’s another really good question.  If Pelosi, Reid, and the Democrats are determined to use any means possible to pass Obamacare, despite the fact that most of the citizens of this country DO NOT WANT THIS BILL TO PASS, how long do you think it will be before an Attorney General in one of the 50 states decides to challenge the bill as being unconstitutional on the grounds that Obama, born a British/dual citizen is not legitimately President?



O’REILLY & FOX NEWS CHALLENGED BY PLAINTIFF IN OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE LAWSUIT – GOING TO DISS ME? PUT UP OR SHUT UP!

Bill O´Reilly on TVThere is no shortage of irony here.

First, we have all heard O’Reilly pontificate that people were afraid to come on his show and spar with him because he is a simple man … a seeker of the truth.

{{ and the choir sang Amen}}

This song has been going on for years. Second, we have the recent White House war on FOX News ostensibly because FNC is supposed to be an extension of the Republican Part and the GOP.

One would never know that to be true given FNC’s phony coverage of Obama’s eligibility to be POTUS! You see, it has never been about just Obama’s birth certificate, it has always been about his citizenship status on the day he was born; O’Reilly and his pals knew that last night!

If you have been following the issues surrounding our faux President Obama (called that until he proves otherwise), you know that FOX has been as complicit at covering and obscuring the truth as the rest of quislings in the MSM. Obama and the White House should be counting their lucky stars that FOX hasn’t reported the truth to date.

That all changed last night when O’Reilly dissed plaintiff Captain Pamela Barnett as a disgruntled military person that didn’t want to be deployed as her reason for challenging Obama’s eligibility to hold the office of POTUS.

If you watched O’Reilly during his legal segment ( with two lawyers sitting across from him), you saw him continue the intentional and ongoing obfuscation of the real issues surrounding Obama as a natural born citizen as required by Article II Section 1 of the Constitution.

Much to my surprise, I just learned that Captain Barnett has issued the following challenge to the “Seeker of Truth O’Reilly”:

From Captain Pamela Barnett to Bill O’Reilly onOctober 28, 2009

I challenge you Mr. O’Reilly to interview me.

I am Captain Pamela Barnett U.S. Army Retired of Barnett v. Barack Obama.

I am sick and tired of you defaming our lawsuit and our attorney against the Resident in the White House Obama. 48 plaintiffs mostly military retired have brought this lawsuit to force the production of Obama’s vital records to determine if he is in fact a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN which is one of the requirements to be a legal POTUS and NOT an illegal USURPER. There is also a huge amount of information regarding fraud that Obama committed before being illegally sworn in as POTUS.

IF YOU CARE ABOUT THE TRUTH AT ALL.. YOU WILL CALL ME…

FROM WHAT I CAN SEE OF YOUR SHOW, THE TRUTH DOES NOT SEEM TO MATTER TO YOU OR THE REST OF THE SHILLS AT FOX. I KNOW THAT YOU ARE ONLY A COMMENTATOR, BUT AT LEAST GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT BEFORE HURTING OUR CASE AND PROPAGATING LIES TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.

Sincerely,

CPT Pamela Barnett, U.S.Army Retired

Memo to O’Reilly and FNC: Now its time to put up or shut up.

Are you going to cover the biggest story since Watergate or not? This story is NEVER going away and the millions of people following this will never let up. FNC can choose to be on the right side of history.

There is only one choice … put Captain Barnett on. If you don’t,  you will giving the world conclusive proof that both FNC and its talent know how to talk about being “Fair and Balanced” and little else! When the “Big O “opened his mouth last night and dissed Barnett, er attorney, and the millions of “birthers” who have been seeking the truth you put yourselves into a box!

While you are at it you should put Leo Donofrio and Mario Apuzzo on and a host of others can can bring real insight to the issues. Don’t know who should be part of FNC’s extensive coverage of the real issues surrounding Obama’s eligibility to hold office? Call me or look here and here.

Besides, seems to me FNC owes no allegiance to the White House any more. That should have stopped the day they declared war against your network.

OBAMA’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE & ELIGIBILITY FOR POTUS – WHAT LAWMAKERS NEED TO KNOW BEFORE RETURNING HOME IN AUGUST (Part Two)

When this has finally played itself out, I think we’ll find that the Obama birth certificate issue has been a brillant con job used to deflect attention from the real issues of Obama’s eligibility to hold the office of POTUS.  Whether Obama was born in Hawaii or Kenya, IT DOESN’T MATTER. The same is true of his mother’s citizenship.

As I said yesterday,I don’t blame lawmakers for wanting to dodge reporters when asked about Obama’s eligibility to hold the office of president.  There is no reason to duck the questions.  Armed with the following information, lawmakers should seek out the MSM and ask why they haven’t done their job.

Is Barack Obama a “natural born citizen” as required under our Constitution?

NO. For a fuller explanation here:

Natural born citizenship status in a nation is granted by the facts of nature of your birth. No law or statute is necessary to grant it. The nations can make any law they wish to make a person a citizen at birth or later. But natural born citizenship can only be conveyed by nature by the facts at birth of the child. If you are born in the country of two citizen parents you are “naturally” … a “natural born citizen” … a citizen too … but a specific kind of citizen who is eligible to be the President and Commander-in-Chief of our military since the child when born has sole allegiance to this country and there is no claim on him/her by a foreign country or power as to their citizenship at birth by that country too. Natural born citizens have unity of citizenship at birth. A natural born citizen is NOT a dual citizen at birth. A natural born citizen has no divided loyalty issues by his birth since the child was born in the country to two citizens of the country

Has Barack Obama ever been eligible to hold office?

NO, but the answer has less to do with his birth certificate than with the status of his citizenship at the time of his birth. The birth certificate has become a ( purposeful) distraction for the larger issues surrounding Obama and the presidency. Obama’s Kenyan father was a British national who passed his citizenship to his son.  His mother could not automatically pass her citizenship to Obama because she was underage at the time of his birth. There is a very strong legal argument to be made that Obama was born a British citizen.

FactCheck.org Clarifies Barack’s Citizenship

“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.

Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.”

Does it matter if he was born in Hawaii or Kenya?

NO, Hawaii or Kenya, it doesn’t matter!   What matters is his citizenship status on August 4, 1961.  Whether he was legally born a British citizen or with dual citizenship, either automatically disqualifies him for POTUS.  For people who are ignorant of the real issues, it is easy to say he was born in Hawaii and that his mother was a U.S. citizen and to dismiss this as racist, Republican, wingnut propaganda.  It doesn’t change the facts.

Has this country ever had a President that is a dual citizen?

NO.

Is Obama a U.S. citizen?

YES … maybe, but not a natural born citizen.  Since he and his legal team haven’t released a single record that buttresses his claim, it is hard to know conclusively. It is possible that he is a naturalized citizen? Yes, but his citizenship claim is complicated by the fact that his mother renounced her citizenship when she married her second husband, Lolo Soetoro and moved to Indonesia.  Her renunciation of U.S. citizenship impacted on Obama’s citizenship status.

Is seeing the long form of his birth certificate important?

YES, but not necessarily to determine if he was born in the United States. The Constitution requires that a candidate running for office of the President be a natural born citizen…not a naturalized citizen, or native born citizen, or dual citizen.  Obama’s own website acknowledges that his citizenship was governed by the British Nationality Act of 1948.

But the MSM keeps saying he’s a citizen and he was born in Hawaii … and what about the birth announcements and the birth certificate that I’ve seen?

IT DOESN’T MATTER! Let me say it again, what matters is Obama’s citizenship status the moment he was born.  Everything else is secondary.  The story provides plausible cover but it is a very small part of the seminal issues surrounding Obama’s citizenship.  Anyone can place an announcement in the newspaper.  The act of placing an announcement in a newspaper proves nothing.  The “birth certificate” is a phony AND probably inadmissible in a court of law!

Even if Obama were to release the vault copy of his birth certificate it doesn’t change the fact that his citizenship was governed by the British Nationality Act of 1948.  He’s a Brit!