Tag Archives: constitutional crisis

Obama’s Failed Presidency Summed Up in Two Words; Let’s Pretend

SHREADING THE CONSTITUTIONWatching what has taken place in the world since Barack Hussein Obama fraudulently entered the White House has been horrific enough. Countless millions have been displaced in Syria, Yemen, Iraq, and Libya because of his meddling and inaction when most urgently needed.

Yesterday was the breaking point.Russia bombed Syrian freedom fighters instead of ISIS, thus propping Assad and strengthening IRAN.


As the U.S. leads from behind (an oxymoron if ever there was) Obama’s chaotic policy, has brought the rise of ISIS with mass murders on a scale not seen since WWII. And if all of this hasn’t been bad enough, the world has had to suffer watching the barbaric destruction of ancient sites and priceless artifacts along with the ethnic cleaning of Christians and other non-Muslim minorities.


All of this was unnecessary. All of this could have been prevented had the media, political classes, and the legal profession had been truthful about Obama’s eligibility to run for the office of U.S. president.


Instead we have Let’s Pretend that:


  1. a man whose father was British subject when he was born, making him a dual citizen at best, met the legal requirement of Natural Born Citizen for the office of POTUS
  2. his upbringing in Indonesia living in a Muslim country during his formative years, going to school and reciting Muslim prayers had no impact on his adult view of the world
  3. the Founding Fathers didn’t foresee that persons not born as Natural Born Citizens (NBC) would face the challenge of divided loyalties
  4. the person holding the single most important position in the world shouldn’t be absolutely clear that his/her loyalty belongs 100% to this country and the Constitution
  5. a community organizer and part-time Constitutional law instructor with radical friends like Bill Ayers, a man with one year in the U.S. Senate was ever qualified for the office
  6. members of both political parties weren’t aware Obama was ineligible because of their own selfish political motives … McCain, Cruz, Rubio, Jindal all ineligible
  7. progressives in politics, the media, and in the legal community haven’t been trying to eliminate the NBC Constitutional qualification for years by ignoring current laws, passing resolutions and private laws designed to side step it
  8. Obama’s draw-down of the military, cuts in defense, obsession with getting an Iran treaty at all costs, giving lip service help our Mideast allies including Jordan, Israel, the Kurds hasn’t helped Iran and strengthened Russia
  9. Obama should remain in office one minute longer!


The fraud at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue needs to resign or be removed as quickly as possible. His residency in the White House is a threat to the safety and security of this country and the civilized world.


Obama’s actions and inactions have proven conclusively his is incapable of carrying  out the duties of POTUS.


UPDATED!!! January 7, 2016 This post was originally written in March of 2011.

Every point made about Obama’s citizenship can be made about Ted Cruz’s citizenship. BOTH knowingly ineligible to become president, neither are natural born citizens! Both knew it then and both know it now! Ironically both are Harvard educated constitutional scholars and lawyers.

Natural born citizenship cannot be conferred, it is the state one is born into to … born of two U.S. citizen parents at the time of birth on U.S. soil!


Can Trump change the course of U.S. history? In a word, yes.

When Trump talks about Obama’s refusal to provide proof of his eligibility (long form birth certificate for starters) to hold the office of POTUS, he brings legitimacy to the issue. That means all those quaking and shaking at the  mention of BHO’s birth certificate can safely come out of the shadows now.

Translated, it’s OK to ask, “Where’s Obama’s birth certificate?”  Even Sean Hannity and the other cable enablers are openly talking about it; although Hannity hasn’t brought up the real reason Obama is ineligible.  But longtime readers here know…Obama was born a British citizen.

There now exists overwhelming evidence that Obama is a fraud, knowingly ineligible to run for POTUS.  The MSM are deluding themselves into thinking their bogus story that  “everyone who questions is a racist/what about those birth announcements” is going to fly any more.

What follows is an “Obama is Brit Primer” for Donald Trump and others who want to put an end to the biggest fraudulent election in American history.

Is Barack Obama a “natural born citizen” as required under our Constitution?

NO. For a fuller explanation here:

Natural born citizenship status in a nation is granted by the facts of nature of your birth. No law or statute is necessary to grant it. The nations can make any law they wish to make a person a citizen at birth or later. But natural born citizenship can only be conveyed by nature by the facts at birth of the child. If you are born in the country of two citizen parents you are “naturally” … a “natural born citizen” … a citizen too … but a specific kind of citizen who is eligible to be the President and Commander-in-Chief of our military since the child when born has sole allegiance to this country and there is no claim on him/her by a foreign country or power as to their citizenship at birth by that country too. Natural born citizens have unity of citizenship at birth. A natural born citizen is NOT a dual citizen at birth. A natural born citizen has no divided loyalty issues by his birth since the child was born in the country to two citizens of the country.

Has Barack Obama ever been eligible to hold office?

NO, but the answer has less to do with his birth certificate than with the status of his citizenship at the time of his birth. The birth certificate has become a purposeful distraction from the larger issues surrounding Obama and the presidency. Obama’s Kenyan father was a British national who passed his citizenship to his son.  His mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, could not automatically pass her citizenship to Obama because she was underage at the time of his birth. There is a very strong legal argument to be made that Obama was born a British citizen.

FactCheck.org Clarifies Barack’s Citizenship (often referred to by Obama supporters)

“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.

Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.” ( Say what? His Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982…OBAMA IS INELIGIBLE TO BE POTUS)

Does it matter if he was born in Hawaii or Kenya?

NO, Hawaii or Kenya, it doesn’t matter!   What matters is his citizenship status on August 4, 1961.  Whether he was legally born a British citizen or with dual citizenship, either automatically disqualifies him for POTUS.  For people who are ignorant of the real issues, it is easy to say he was born in Hawaii and that his mother was a U.S. citizen and to dismiss anyone who questions as racist, Republican, wingnut propaganda.  It doesn’t change the facts.

Has this country ever had a President that is a dual citizen?


Is Obama a U.S. citizen?

YES … maybe, but not a natural born citizen as is Constitutionally required.  Since he and his legal team haven’t released a single record that buttresses his claim, it is hard to conclusively know what his citizenship status is. It is possible that he is a naturalized citizen? Yes, but his citizenship claim is complicated by the fact that his mother renounced her citizenship when she married her second husband, Lolo Soetoro and moved to Indonesia.  Her renunciation of U.S. citizenship impacted on Obama’s citizenship status. Existing documents of Obama’s time in Kenya list him as an Indonesian and a Muslim)

Not to complicate things any further, but we also have all of those social security numbers that are ascribed to Obama. The SS# he uses was issued to a man (now deceased) from Connecticut.

Is seeing the long form of his birth certificate important?

YES, but not necessarily to determine if he was born in the United States. The Constitution requires that a candidate running for office of the President be a natural born citizen…not a naturalized citizen, or native born citizen, or dual citizen.  Obama’s own website acknowledges that his citizenship was governed by the British Nationality Act of 1948.

But the MSM keeps saying he’s a citizen and he was born in Hawaii … and what about the birth announcements and the birth certificate that Ive seen?

IT DOESN’T MATTER! Let me say it again, what matters is Obama’s citizenship status the moment he was born.  Everything else is secondary.  The story provides plausible cover but it is a very small part of the seminal issues surrounding Obama’s citizenship.  Anyone can place an announcement in the newspaper.  The act of placing an announcement in a newspaper proves nothing.  The “birth certificate”  shown on the Internet is a phony AND probably inadmissible in a court of law!

Even if Obama were to release the vault copy of his birth certificate it doesn’t change the fact that his citizenship was governed by the British Nationality Act of 1948.  He’s a Brit!




This was originally written in 2010 shortly after Obamacare passed on a strictly partisan basis…not a single GOP member voting for it.


I never really cared for Ronald Reagan that much, having believed the propaganda from the left and the MSM, that he wasn’t terribly bright … I was wrong!  I confess to thinking he was just a nice man who could tell a good joke … after all he had impeccable timing having been an actor, don’t you know!


I always thought that the term liberal main stream media, was a fabrication of all those nasty Republicans and conservatives … I was wrong. Watching the Constitutionally ineligible Obama get elected in 2008 watching and the tactics (truth squads, voter intimidation) used by Team Obama (and the MSM) to obstruct the will of the voters (18 millions voters can’t be wrong), to side-step and ignore the Constitution has completely changed my opinion.


This doesn’t mean that I will ever call myself a Republican or that I admire everything the Reagan administration did.  They used sleight of hand just as effectively as Obama, Pelosi, and Reid do today.  After all who can forget  Iran-Contra or the huge deficit Reagan left upon leaving office?


That having been said, how can one listen to these videos and not acknowledge Reagan was right when it came to socialism and the progressives?  Think yesterday’s “historic” passage of the Dem’s health care package happened in a vacuüm?


Think again. Damn it, Reagan was right!


And so, today we have government mandated health care for every citizen with the threat of 16,500 IRS agents to be hired every month to make sure every citizen purchases health insurance … this in the land of the free and the brave!


Bill O´Reilly on TVThere is no shortage of irony here.

First, we have all heard O’Reilly pontificate that people were afraid to come on his show and spar with him because he is a simple man … a seeker of the truth.

{{ and the choir sang Amen}}

This song has been going on for years. Second, we have the recent White House war on FOX News ostensibly because FNC is supposed to be an extension of the Republican Part and the GOP.

One would never know that to be true given FNC’s phony coverage of Obama’s eligibility to be POTUS! You see, it has never been about just Obama’s birth certificate, it has always been about his citizenship status on the day he was born; O’Reilly and his pals knew that last night!

If you have been following the issues surrounding our faux President Obama (called that until he proves otherwise), you know that FOX has been as complicit at covering and obscuring the truth as the rest of quislings in the MSM. Obama and the White House should be counting their lucky stars that FOX hasn’t reported the truth to date.

That all changed last night when O’Reilly dissed plaintiff Captain Pamela Barnett as a disgruntled military person that didn’t want to be deployed as her reason for challenging Obama’s eligibility to hold the office of POTUS.

If you watched O’Reilly during his legal segment ( with two lawyers sitting across from him), you saw him continue the intentional and ongoing obfuscation of the real issues surrounding Obama as a natural born citizen as required by Article II Section 1 of the Constitution.

Much to my surprise, I just learned that Captain Barnett has issued the following challenge to the “Seeker of Truth O’Reilly”:

From Captain Pamela Barnett to Bill O’Reilly onOctober 28, 2009

I challenge you Mr. O’Reilly to interview me.

I am Captain Pamela Barnett U.S. Army Retired of Barnett v. Barack Obama.

I am sick and tired of you defaming our lawsuit and our attorney against the Resident in the White House Obama. 48 plaintiffs mostly military retired have brought this lawsuit to force the production of Obama’s vital records to determine if he is in fact a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN which is one of the requirements to be a legal POTUS and NOT an illegal USURPER. There is also a huge amount of information regarding fraud that Obama committed before being illegally sworn in as POTUS.




CPT Pamela Barnett, U.S.Army Retired

Memo to O’Reilly and FNC: Now its time to put up or shut up.

Are you going to cover the biggest story since Watergate or not? This story is NEVER going away and the millions of people following this will never let up. FNC can choose to be on the right side of history.

There is only one choice … put Captain Barnett on. If you don’t,  you will giving the world conclusive proof that both FNC and its talent know how to talk about being “Fair and Balanced” and little else! When the “Big O “opened his mouth last night and dissed Barnett, er attorney, and the millions of “birthers” who have been seeking the truth you put yourselves into a box!

While you are at it you should put Leo Donofrio and Mario Apuzzo on and a host of others can can bring real insight to the issues. Don’t know who should be part of FNC’s extensive coverage of the real issues surrounding Obama’s eligibility to hold office? Call me or look here and here.

Besides, seems to me FNC owes no allegiance to the White House any more. That should have stopped the day they declared war against your network.


The Internet is all atwitter this morning … is the Obama Kenyan birth certificate real?


Or, is Obama toast?


As to be expected camps on both sides have their guns out proving and disproving the document’s authenticity.

For the record I don’t know.  I saw this story yesterday and have purposely kept my powder dry on this until more is known.  Also, as I have stated numerous times, whether Obama was born in Hawaii (doubtful) or Kenyan (probable) is immaterial.  What counts is his citizenship status on the day he was born … almost certainly British … with best case scenario being … he held dual citizenship.

Either way he is disqualified!

Laugh out loud news flash from Lame Cherry

Breaking News:

Obama Pelosi retroactively annex Kenya as 51st US State as of August 3rd, 1961, Gordonian Knot Brown, signs the papers making it all legal.


Well, the cable networks are finally giving the Obama birth certificate/natural born citizen issues some air time.  Right?  Well, not exactly.

Last week the words “Obama, ineligible to be president, and birth certificate” were spoken over at FOX and at CNN.  The Lou Dobbs radio show devoted a significant amount of time to the topic and asked the question we have been asking for months, “Why not release the darn birth certificate?”    No need to ask that question anymore.  It hasn’t been released because it has information on it that would prove Obama has no right to be called President.

The Dobbs radio show was in sharp contrast to the televised segment hosed by Kitty Pilgrim.  Instead of giving us honest reporting, most of the FACEOFF segment was spent defending Obama and trying to “debunk” the legitimate issues surrounding Obama’s refusal to produce ANY documents supporting his claim to American citizenship.

It appears the only reason CNN focused on the ongoing issues surrounding Obama’s birth certificate was to take issue with Dr. Orly Taitz and Alan Keyes and to make them look foolish.  The CNN segment ran 6:45; of which more than 3 minutes were spent defending Obama’s phony COLB (certificate of live birth).  Using Annenberg’s Fact Check and two announcements of Obama’s birth in Hawaiian newspapers to buttress the claims that this story has been “thoroughly investigated” and reported, Pilgrim sucked up air time and droned on and on.  It wasn’t until the last 30 seconds of the segment that Taitz had time to mention Obama’s dual citizenship,  and that was virtually drown out as the segment was fast coming to a close.

Watch the video and ask yourself if you think Obama’s ineligibility to serve as POTUS was given a fair hearing.

Here’s the ongoing major problem with most of the focus on Obama’s birth certificate. The focus on the birth certificate has obscured the larger issues with Obama’s claim to US citizenship. The MSM’s “analysis” of Obama’s Hawaiian/Kenyan birth never gets  any further than his mother was a citizen of this country.  Those who want to silent us use, “She was an American citizen, case closed.”  In truth, I’ll bet you couldn’t find two “reporters” in the MSM who could give an explanation of the differences between a citizen, a natural born citizen, a naturalized citizen.

As Leo Donfrio (Donfrio v. Wells) has said numerous times and in various ways:

It’s obvious that the framers drew a distinction between the meaning of “citizen” and the meaning of “natural born citizen”.  A “citizen” can be Senator or Representative, but in order to be President one must be a natural born citizen.

In order to be a natural born citizen BOTH parents have to citizens of this country.  Team Obama has embraced his father’s nationality.  This cannot be side stepped.   That means the best case scenario for Obama is he was born with dual citizenship.  The Constitution does not allow for our country’s President to hold dual citizenship.

In reality, there is a strong legal case to be made that Obama was born a British citizen. Obama’s father was born in Kenya and was a British citizen at the time BHO was born.  Because his mother was too young enough to confer her citizenship to Obama, it was Obama’s father’s nationality that was passed onto Obama. This is a FACT, end of story.

Again, from Donofrio:


It’s the difference between a fact and a legal status.

Whether you are a natural born citizen is a fact of nature which can’t be waived or renounced, but your actual legal citizenship can be renounced.  The difference is subtle, but so very important.  “Natural born citizen” is not a different form of “citizenship”.  It is a manner of acquiring citizenship.  And while natural born citizens may end their legal tie to the country by renouncing citizenship, they will always have been naturally born into that nation as a citizen.

Although this has been stated elsewhere, this comment  from Watching the Nation succinctly states the legal status of Obama:

According to common law and Vattel (mentioned above) it seems the term “natural born” was and is and has always been understood to mean born to parents who are citizens (with an s)  (and with emphasis on the father) of the United States.

What we have in our current president is a man who is the child of a British national.

Whether Obama was born in Hawaii, or Kenya, or Timbuktu, doesn’t matter one whit.  His father’s nationality was passed on to him, thus making Obama ineligible to be President of the United States!


Well, here we go again, the Obama Administration is having trouble with that pesky document, the Constitution.  But, should anyone be surprised?  Why shouldn’t faux President Obama and his team of miscreants continue trashing the document?

MOSCOW — With the clock running out on a new US-Russian arms treaty before the previous Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, or START, expires on December 5, a senior White House official said Sunday said that the difficulty of the task might mean temporarily bypassing the Senate’s constitutional role in ratifying treaties by enforcing certain aspects of a new deal on an executive levels and a “provisional basis” until the Senate ratifies the treaty.

“The most ideal situation would be to finish it in time that it could be submitted to the Senate so that it can be ratified,”said White House Coordinator for Weapons of Mass Destruction, Security and Arms Control Gary Samore. “If we’re not able to do that, we’ll have to look at arrangements to continue some of the inspection provisions, keep them enforced in a provisional basis, while the Senate considers the treaty.”

Never in my lifetime did I ever think, that the U.S. Constitution would be ignored on a regular basis, tossed out the window

. . . and barely a whimper out of Congress.


How many Americans do you think have heard about this story? We are 5 days away from the general election and incredibly we do not know if Barack Obama is eligible to run for the office of President of the United States.

Today Philadelphia attorney Phillip Berg, a Democrat and former Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania is heading to the Supreme Court, in hopes that a decision will be handed down forcing the DNC and Barack Obama to produce the vault birth certificate that finally proves once and for all, whether or not Barry Sotero, aka Barry Dunham, aka Barack Hussein Obama is natural born citizen and whether he was ever eligible to run for office of any kind.

The silence of the MSM on this blockbuster story, a story with profound issues that go directly to the heart of the Constitution remains stubbornly under reported, unless a person happened to catch this story on the Toledo TV station.

When history traces back to the “death of journalism” this will be one of the stories that will be brought up, dissected, and marveled at, along with stories like the Obama “Truth Squads” in Missouri. For by not reporting the legion of legitimate Obama stories, the MSM has gelded itself, rendered the Fourth Estate impotent. What is worse, is that these unreported Obama stories are potent lies of omission . . . the very worst kind of lies . . . because these types of lies require forethought!

Even if one thought the Berg v Obama case was frivolous, that Berg was a whack job, this story is at least as important as the one about Hillary’s Pennsylvania campaign spending $30,000.00 on Dunkin Donuts. (she said facetiously, should anyone miss the sarcasm) But this isn’t about donuts, this is about democracy. This is about Howard Dean, the DNC, and Obama knowingly foisting an ineligible candidate on America . . . a candidate, BTW, some have likened to the Manchurian Candidate. This is about the 18 million Hillary voters whose rights have already been abridged.

sidebar: Mr. Berg why aren’t you suing on behalf and Jane & John Doe and the already disenfranchised 18 million voters who would be voting for their candidate of choice, Hillary Rodham Clinton, instead of the impostor Obama? Doesn’t that give us standing? This injury has already come to pass. Seems to me that Judge Posen’s quote in the ruling just handed down by presiding judge in round one of Berg v. Obama fits us to a tee. Judge Posen said in part:

[…] Desire does not create standing . . . It must be more direct and immediate. It must (at least) resemble the type of injury that would support a lawsuit under traditional principles of common law or equity; it must therefor affect one’s possessions, or bodily integrity, or freedom of action (emphasis mine.)

It must, in short, be fairly describable as an injury personal to the plaintiff – a deprivation of his rights.

To which I would argue . . . HELLO . . . haven’t I already been deprived of my right to vote for HRC, a candidate we know meets the Constitutional requirements to run for office of POTUS?

According to Edwin Vieira, Jr., in OBAMA MUST STAND UP NOW OR STAND DOWN, if it turns out Obama was ineligible from the onset of the election, he faces some very serious consequences, and it seems to me, so too those who assisted in perpetrating this fraud. He says, in part:

[…] Obama’s stubborn refusal to provide what he claims is “his own” country with conclusive proof (emphasis is mine) on that score compels the presumption that he knows, or at least strongly suspects, that no sufficient evidence in his favor exists. After all, he is not being pressed to solve a problem in quantum physics that is “above his pay grade,” but only asked to provide the public with the original copy of some official record that establishes his citizenship.


[…] Second, if Obama dares to take the Presidential “Oath or Affirmation” of office, knowing that he is not “a natural born Citizen,” he will commit the crime of perjury or false swearing (see Article II, Section 1, Clause 7). For, being ineligible for “the Office of President, he cannot “faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States,”

[…] Third, his purported “Oath or Affirmation” being perjured from the beginning, Obama’s every subsequent act in the usurped “Office of President” will be a criminal offense under Title 18, United States Code, Section 242,

[…] Eight, … if the Establishment allowed Obama to pretend to be “the President,” and the people acquiesced in that charade, just about everything that was done during his faux “tenure in office” by anyone connected with the Executive Branch of the General Government, and quite a bit done by the Legislative Branch and perhaps the Judicial Branch as well, would be arguably illegitimate and subject to being overturned when a constitutional President was finally installed in office. The potential for chaos, both domestically and internationally, arising out of this systemic uncertainty is breathtaking.

Now, at the risk of being accused of wearing tin foil on my head, so be it!

Anyone remember Biden’s warning that in 6 months there would be a crisis facing the country and many people would not support Obama’s actions even though the new Administration felt they were right? What’s to prevent a faux President Obama from declaring martial law? Thanks to Bush 43’s signing NATIONAL SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE/NSPD 51, a faux President Obama could do this at will, in the name of national security!

In another barely reported story, powerful generals from the most powerful nations in the world recently held a meeting in tiny town in upstate New York. The Army has also stationed an infantry unit inside the United States. It is the first time a dedicated unit has been given an assignment as a response force for “crowd control” and other sorts of internal tasks.

Tell me again why the MSM isn’t reporting on Obama’s refusal to produce his vault birth certificate, his college transcripts, his health records . . . all the basic documentation required of any candidate for the office of president.

While you’re at, tell me if I should be adjusting the tin foil on my head or going out to arm up should there be an insurrection?

For excellent on going legal analysis Berg v. Obama see:America’s Right.