Share
  •  
  • Archives for cable networks (5)

HILLARY WHO SHOULD TAKE A PAGE OUT OF SARAH’S BOOK … COLIN POWELL’S BOOK

I’ve been watching the MSM and Sarah’s Palin’s critics dissect her resignation, knowing full well that CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC Snooze, et al. wouldn’t have a single kind or impartial word to say about her.

Some of the inane shatter included:  she’s a quitter… it’s mistake or what was she thinking? ….  she put herself out there … she’s not tough enough … she rambled or was incoherent.” Let’s face it, what this group of Obama sycophants can’t stand is Palin has decided to play by her own rules.  Ouch!

True to form, they didn’t let me down, with Keith Olbermann holding onto the number spot for most scurrilous, misogynistic Palin harangue.  His guest yesterday was Shannyn Moore, the bitch blogger who was spreading the rumor around that the FBI was investigating Palin and then was incensed that Palin’s attorney pushed back.

It was the Bitch Blogger’s opinion that Dave Letterman had taken the high road when dealing with Sarah and her daughter’s. SNAP ! {sound of my brain cells splitting as I channel surfed to FOX}

What’s this got to do with Hillary?

Hillary Clinton Campaigns Ahead Of Pennsylvania's Crucial Primary

Yesterday, I found another site that had sent out an Amber Alert for Hillary. It said what I’ve been thinking for some time now.  Where is Hillary?  How ’bout she’s been marginalized to such an extent that Team Obama has practically rendered the office of Secretary of State to minor and non-existent.   With the number of people Obama has running around on “special assignment” what’s left for Hillary to do but dust her office and tend to her broken arm?

Hillary Rodham Clinton has become Hillary Who? Sorry, sad but true.

All of which brings me back to Palin and Powell.  Palin’s resignation was principled, courageous, and selfless . . . she put Alaska ahead of herself … bravo!  When Powell resigned, it was pretty clear his resignation was also one of principle.  It’s clear there were never any weapons of mass destruction … and if one more person says, “why did Saddam say he had those weapons, if he didn’t?”  My answer is, “didn’t you ever play poker?”  He was bluffing, you idiot!  I’ve got a pair of deuces… BOO!

Back to my girl Hillary, if she and I were having a drink here’s what I’d tell her.

“You’re are already dying a death by a thousand cuts, snubs.

What do you have left to prove?  Screw the “establishment”  the MSM and many members of of your own party savaged you before and they will, again.  The only question is what excuse will they use.  Besides, Obama was never eligible to hold office, we all know that.  The truth has a way of coming out, and his eligibility is no different.  History will not look kindly upon this period of self indulgence by the MSM and those who knowingly allowed an ineligible man to hold the office of POTUS.

Hey, girl, how impressed do you think Putin was of Obama yesterday?  (I imagine she’s laughing here!)  I’m guessing Putin thinks Obama is as big an asshole, as I do! Did you see Putin’s body language? Whoa!

What do you owe Obama, anyway?  We all saw what happened in the primaries.  I’ve  always thought Obama double crossed you and Bill.  While I don’t know this for a fact, I’ve often wondered if he didn’t blackmail Bill somehow. (She leans in and whispers, and tells me what really happened … sorry sworn to secrecy!)

Leave while you have your dignity in tact.  Take control of  your life … take it back!   You probably will never be President, and that’s a real loss for this country!  What happened in the election of 2008 will never be OK.

I’m betting you can do more outside of this administration.  If you thought Palin’s resignation caused a stir, what will do they if you resign?  My God, Andrea Mitchell, Olbermann, the whole crew over at MSNBC will be in an uproar.  Bet that brings a smile to your lips!”

It at this point we hear that wonderful Hillary laugh!



Share

LETTERMAN STILL DOESN’T GET IT- APOLOGY #2 SELF SERVING & INADEQUATE

Well, I stayed up to hear Letterman’s apology.  I figured it was best to hear it first hand . . . it’s clear he still doesn’t get it.  For starters, the apology was all about him and his having told a bad joke!

I’ve got news for you Dave, this wasn’t about a poorly crafted joke or a flawed joke.  And  it doesn’t matter one wit that you really meant to direct the joke to Palin’s older daughter.

Are we really supposed to believe that because her older daughter is 18 that your  jokes were OK?  Really?

YouTube Preview Image

I am so sick and tired having to write about this time and again.  Verbal violence of this sort is unacceptable … period!  I thought we got this straight in the 70′s with the women’s movement . . . violence against one woman is violence against all women!

Know what one of the biggest differences between men and women is?  Every woman, at one time or another has had thoughts about rape.  I don’t know a lot of men having to deal with that possibility.  Women question what they would  do if it ever happened . . . could they survive a violent attack.

I don’t care what color she is, what socio-economic class she comes from, her religion, the country she lives in . . .  every woman has had to contend with thoughts of violence at one time or another in her life.Who doesn’t have story about some jerk copping a feel, or about a close call in college or high school when it could have happened, but luck and quick thinking prevailed.

The problem with Letterman’s jokes, is that they reinforce stereotypes in the minds of the sickos out there.  This kind of joking makes it seem like the sickos have permission to physically and verbally abuse women.  Sorry, that’s true . . . so don’t tell me these were only jokes.

And while I’m at it, did anyone give any thought to what kind of ridicule, Willow or Bristol might possibly face  among their peers?  No, of course not!

So, here’s my sentence for Dave Letterman, a once clever and funny mad man of late night TV . . . Dave , you get to spend weekends for the next six months visiting rape crisis centers.  You listen to the stories of the broken lives and broken hearts . . . and you tell these women how you were only joking!

YouTube Preview Image
Share

OF DON IMUS’ NAPPY HEADED HO’S & DAVE LETTERMAN’S PALIN DERANGEMENT

In April 2007,  Don Imus uttered the now infamous “nappy headed ho” comment about the woman’s basketball players from Rutgers University.  His 30 second off the cuff comment was a dumb ass, unscripted moment . . . part of the “guy talk” and banter during the sports segment of his radio show.

Long time listeners like myself, winced knowing he didn’t mean to intentionally harm the girls. In fact, it was uncharacteristic for the I Man to after anyone like the women basketball players.  Imus saved his shot for the rich, the  pompous, the famous and infamous, political hucksters and hacks alike; that’s why we loved him.

The behind the scenes story that the MSM didn’t cover was this.  Media Matters had been monitoring his show for over years, recording it, waiting for him to say something that could be used against him. Imus gave Media Matters  an opening they were looking for:

At 6:14 a.m. on Wednesday, April 4, relatively few people were tuned into the “Imus in the Morning Show” when Don Imus referred to the Rutgers women’s basketball team as “nappy-headed ho’s.”

Ryan Chiachiere was. A 26-year-old researcher in Washington, D.C., for liberal watchdog organization Media Matters for America, he was assigned to monitor Mr. Imus’s program. Mr. Chiachiere clipped the video, alerted his bosses and started working on a blog post for the organization’s Web site

[...] Media Matters posted the video and transcript on its Web site and sent an email blast to several hundred reporters, as it does nearly every day.

The fact is, that Media Matters sent out an email blast to groups that included the National Organization for Women and National Association of Black Journalists.  When the Reverend Al got involved Imus was toast.  The rest, as we know, is history.

The truth is the whole event was scripted and staged.  People that had never heard an Imus broadcast were outraged . . . we had weeks of manufactured “outrage” by people with an agenda and raw political motives . . .  the cowardice and complicity of the MSM were on display. Imus apologized, multiple times, he was fired by MSNBC and CBS.

When the Imus brouhaha  happened, I was sure the conservatives and the cable entourage over at FOX News were going to have a hay day skewering Imus … he called Vice President Cheney, Pork Chop Boy on a regular basis.  He was critical of the Bush administration, after all.  But I was wrong! Wrong!

In fact, conservative radio and the right leaning cable shows jumped to his defense!  Ann Coulter (!) defended him, as did a legion of others I was sure would desert him.  I was stunned to see people in the press I had admired for years turn out to be frauds!  Slowly, I witnessed the bias of  liberal MSM . . . liberal bias wasn’t a delusion of those on the right!   It wasn’t a delusion and I was wrong.  Time Magazine was a rag and forget MSNBC.

It was the Imus controversy that started my activism.  I was calling radio shows (!) and blogging for the first time in my life, defending a grumpy old comic on principle! Irony abounds here, because at the time I was very critical of Hillary Clinton . .  and  I wouldn’t change my opinion about her until the New Hampshire primary, but that’s another story!

By the time the primaries were in full swing, the MO of the MSM was easy to spot and predict.  It was clear the MSM had a school girl crush on Obama.  Hillary and Sarah, on the other hand, were targets of the most vicious attacks and would remain so.  What happened to them remains unconscionable, which leads us to today, CBS and Dave Letterman.

Now comes Dave Letterman, CBS’s late night comic.   Apparently, Letterman is an Obama crackhead . . .  no longer capable of figuring out that a 14 year daughter of a politician is off limits to sexual comments and innuendo during a “comedy” monologue .  What he said was crude, tasteless, insensitive, and unnecessary.  Actually, it was unforgivable given the fact that his monologue is scripted and described over at HillBuzz:

On June 9th, 2009, David Letterman told his audience that Sarah Palin’s daughter had been “knocked up” during a New York Yankees game by 33 year-old Alex “A-Rod” Rodriguez.  Sarah Palin’s daughter, the only child of hers attending that Yankees game in New York, is 14 years-old — making Letterman’s joke about statutory rape, and how funny it is that during a baseball game at the new Yankee Stadium Alex Rodriguez took time during one of the innings to rape Willow Palin, impregnate her, and then get back to his duties on the field.

The next day, on June 10th, 2009, David Letterman said Willow Palin had become a prostitute, and was now kin to the hookers hired by former Governor Eliot Spitzer.

This is, of course, in addition to Letterman calling the Governor of America’s largest state “a slutty flight attendant”, accusing her of having a crack habit, denigrating her intelligence, and implying she was a lesbian.

I’m going to say this again, the monologue was rehearsed & scripted and meant to hurt, demean, and diminish Sarah Palin and her family. Not only did the monologue go on for several minutes, but the controversy has continued roiling for days. The words in Letterman’s monologue were the equivalent of  media approved violence against a 14 year old young girl and a woman whose political views the MSM is terrified of. Cowards and bullies pick on girls and women attending a baseball game!

I can’t rid my system of the bile when I see videos of Letterman’s attacks on Sarah and her daughters.  His apology that he didn’t mean the 14 year old daughter, but the 18 year old daughter is obscene.  I guess rape against the 18 year old is OK.  Dave, you are an asshole!

And what about CBS’s reaction and the reaction of the cast of characters that were so outraged over Imus?   CBS the network of Katie Couric, the network that fired Imus … because of a 30 second unscripted moment  . .  has remained silent … not even a slap on the hand. The National Organization for Woman, the same group that went after Imus like a bunch of cats after a field mouse,  finally issued a tepid statement about Letterman’s Palin derangement … after three days!

Of course, NBC and MSNBC have not disappointed us in the hypocrisy department either.  Contessa (I’m dumber and denser than a stone) Brewer remains perplexed  why Palin didn’t understand Letterman’s joke.  Olbermann has continued his blame the victim routine against Palin; ya, how dare Sarah think she could go to a baseball game with her daughter and not be attacked? Matt Lauer took Letterman’s side while Sarah Palin defended her daughter and girls and women across the country.

The list of hypocrites and Palin/conservative haters goes on and on . . . all defending the indefensible.

So,  boys ‘n girls what have we learned through all of this?  Well, apparently some comedians get a pass and others don’t.   See, it depends on what color you are and your political persuasion.

If you are liberal, left, and an Obama supporter you get a free pass no matter how vile and hateful your words are. That’s why Letterman still has a job … what he said was comedy.  See the difference?

If you are perceived to be conservative, pro-life, or anyone that is perceived to threaten Obama and the liberal/progressive agenda . . . watch out.  If you are a black comedian attacking a white girl you get a pass as well, ask Miley Cyrus. See, what this jerk-off said was comedy. See the difference?

It’s become de rigueur . . . you must be rude and crude and anything goes.  That’s why Anderson Cooper can poke fun about how difficult it is to talk while tea bagging, Jenine Garafalo can spew her venomous hatred towards all things not Obama.

BTW, Al Roker former NBC Today Show fatso (see fatso is OK because it’s just a little teasing),  was among the cast of characters who was “outraged” at Imus 30 second remark . . . a few weeks later he was joking around &  made an off the cuff comment of his own about epilepsy and epileptic seizures.  He didn’t get fired.  See, the difference?

Obama dissed the Special Olympians during the campaign.  Any  outrage here by the MSM!  No, of course not!   See, the difference?

Share

BREAK OUT THE CHAMPAGNE – MSNBC DEMOTING CHRIS MATTHEWS & THE HATED KEITH OLBERMANN

This couldn’t have happened to two finer fellows! Hear those cheers in that background? They are coming from:

  • Moderates and Independents from both parties, Republicans and Democrats
  • Women & men that are tired of the constant misogyny packaged as “political commentary”
  • IMUS supporters
  • PUMA’s and other supporters of democracy that no longer exists within the Democratic Party
  • Supporters of Hillary Rodham Clinton and women candidates everywhere
  • Viewers of every persuasion . . . tired of the partisan politics and reporting of MSNBC

The New York Times is reporting this seismic shift in programming in a new article written today. This is must read for all of us that witnessed the complete and utter downfall of MSNBC starting with the Imus firing in April of 2007. The article reads in part:

The change — which comes in the home stretch of the long election cycle — is a direct result of tensions associated with the channel’s perceived shift to the political left.

“The most disappointing shift is to see the partisan attitude move from prime time into what’s supposed to be straight news programming,” said Davidson Goldin, formerly the editorial director of MSNBC and a co-founder of the reputation management firm DolceGoldin.

Executives at the channel’s parent company, NBC Universal, had high hopes for MSNBC’s coverage of the political conventions. Instead, the coverage frequently descended into on-air squabbles between the anchors, embarrassing some workers at NBC’s news division, and quite possibly alienating viewers. Although MSNBC nearly doubled its total audience compared with the 2004 conventions, its competitive position did not improve, as it remained in last place among the broadcast and cable news networks. (surprise, surprise, surprise… and they wonder why!) In prime time, the channel averaged 2.2 million viewers during the Democratic convention and 1.7 million viewers during the Republican convention.

The success of the Fox News Channel in the past decade along with the growth of political blogs have convinced many media companies that provocative commentary attracts viewers and lures Web browsers more than straight news delivered dispassionately.

“In a rapidly changing media environment, this is the great philosophical debate,” Phil Griffin, the president of MSNBC, said in a telephone interview Saturday. Fighting the ratings game, he added, “the bottom line is that we’re experiencing incredible success.”

But as the past two weeks have shown, that success has a downside. When the vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin lamented media bias during her speech, attendees of the Republican convention loudly chanted “NBC.”

After you have read this, please visit my new blog on the impact of plastics on our environment! This is a political issue that effects everyone on the planet.

Go to Say No To Plastic.

Share

The Media, Obama, & the Next Great Scandal

We’ve all heard about the hard decisions that editors are forced to make about stories; to print or not to print . . . you know. I have been facing a similar dilemma since my daily stroll on the Internet, two days ago. Trust me; I wasn’t looking for this one. Since reading it, I feel like I’ve been splattered with all kinds of pigeon muck from above. Be gone, damn spot!

There is a story that has been going around (apparently for some time) about Barack Obama’s past that if true, would make the Bill Clinton/Monica Lewinsky mess pale in comparison. Part of the internal fight has arisen because on a scale of 1 to 10, the “Yuk factor” associated with this story is easily a 37 or a 38; not pretty to say the least. On the other side of the equation, the “what if” questions is, “will this turn out to be an Internet jackalope?”

For those of you who don’t know what a jackalope is, it’s a jackrabbit with tiny antlers sticking out of its head. You can find them in small towns throughout the west, their tiny heads mounted on plaques and displayed for sale. Jackalopes are also a joke perpetrated by locals on tourists who buy these amazing little critters and bring them home to show the folks. (If you own one of these, now you can say you knew about the joke, all the time!)

I finally decided that not blogging about this would be a mistake. I also decided to give you, the reader, the opportunity to look the story up (it won’t be hard to find this one) and decide for yourself, rather than give the person who is making these accusations free access to pollute, if the story is false.

What has this have to do with the media? Well, it appears that mainstream media has had this story for some time and has been reluctant to pursue it, although more than one of the supermarket journalistic rags have published the story. The MSM is in a tough position, which I fully understand. If MSM releases the story too late (how could you hold the story, knowing its significance?) they’re screwed. If they release the story and it turns out to be false, they’re screwed.

If the story is true, Obama’s run for the presidency is over and whatever Reverend Wright has said will be a blip on the radar screen. The larger problem is, should Obama ultimately win the Democratic Party’s nomination for president and the charges fully emerge into the daylight, while he is running against McCain, the 2008 race for president is over.

BTW, don’t think the conservatives don’t already have this story. They do. There are numerous conservative sites where you can download your free “The Real Barack Obama” report for $39.95.  While you are nosing around, you’ll find lots on Michelle, as well. If you liked Hillary as First Lady, you’ll love Michelle. As I write this, I keep wondering if the Republican conservatives are keeping their powder dry on this until … you get to fill in the blanks. Yep, just wait in the woods and spring this baby when Dem’s least except it.

This may be the story that Robert Novak alluded to a few months ago, essentially saying the Clinton campaign had “the goods” on Obama and decided not to use them. If that supposition is true, clearly the Clinton campaign has proved they are not interested in winning at all costs. I don’t know. What I do know is that no one can be happy about this.

The MSM needs to do its job prove these accusations are false. They have the tools to prove or disprove the claims of this man. This country doesn’t need another sitting president hampered by lawsuits while trying to handle the people’s business.

Share
page 1 of 1
hillary ‘n me

The Cain Smear Campaign & the Elitist Cabal that Benefits

There's only one question to ask as we watch the latest assault on a political candidate that isn't the choice of the Elitist Cabal. Who has [more]

Why Are the Feds Turning Off All TV & Radio Communications on November 9th?

Why do the Feds need to test a COMPLETE communications [more]

Cain forgot to read his I'm black & I'm oppressed card

Why do black liberals and "Progressives" fear and hate Herman Cain? You tell me! MSNBC, CNN, the LSM are spending hours of programming time tearing Herman [more]

Cain Hit Piece by Politico Predictable and Unintensionally Funny

OK, I'm trying to figure out what that kind of physical gesture that wasn't overtly sexual, could be. If Cain whipped "it" out and placed it [more]

Louisiana Bans Cash Sales; Why the Government Wants to Take Your Cash

The headline screamed, "Louisiana Bans Cash!" When I heard this two days ago I thought it was a joke, but this isn't funny and it's [more]

Why it's hard to take the Wall Street protesters seriously

Nothing's funnier in my book than a guy protesting "corporate greed" & pooping on a police car in NYC while wearing his [more]

Can't we get Obama to just shut up?

I don't know about you, but I can barely stand to hear Obama say three words. Talk about fingernails on a chalkboard! The Reverend Al, Lawrence [more]

OBAMA,BONG POLITICS & MARXISM

I read this a few days ago. Shame on me for not posting this sooner when J.R. Dunn was talking about Obama and the Solyndra [more]

REVOLVER

In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

George Orwell.

besides…

Herman Cain can become the Peoples President. Unlike Obama, Cain’s grassroots support is real not manufactured.

THE PEOPLES PRESIDENT 2012

Herman Cain crushed the so-called first tier candidates Mitt Romney (aka mittens) and Rick Perry in yesterday’s Florida straw poll. Cain’s win is important enough to bring international interest, with the International Business Times calling it a new race.

Surprise, surprise. surprise, (not!) the Sunday talk shows are chattering about Cain defeating Romney and Perry in the Florida straw poll.

What is left unsaid is that the real surprise to them is that the voters are not following the MSM & GOP elites narrative on who is likely to run against the fraud Obama.

Their narrative has no room for Herman Cain and so they barely/rarely cover him. Why bring attention to a man who can really turn this country around, right? And so they speak his name in whispers or not at all! All of that changed yesterday.

One of the lessons to be learned in the 2012 election is name recognition isn’t everything. It’s the message that counts! Simply put so even a Progressive “journalist” can understand, the truth will out!

What the GOP elites and the MSM fail to realize, is that they have made themselves increasingly irrelevant to the voters of America. They are as tone deaf to the voters as Obama is to capitalism.

A Cain victory over Obama is payback by the Birthers and independents for the GOP’s failure to tell the truth about Obama’s ineligibility. It is payback for knowingly leading the nation astray. Obama’s a fake and everyone knows it, with the possible exception of the most rabid Obots.

Even worse than Obama’s fraudulent presidency (Born a Brit, not Legit) has been his clear inability to perform the tasks at hand. BHO likes the pomp and circumstance. but the work needed to truly be the POTUS. God, he is such a waste, such an empty suit!

Unlike Romney (picked by Rove) and Perry (said to be NWO), Cain is not a  bought man, and that boys ‘n girls is like a breath of fresh air.  Unlike Obama, Cain thankfully is not a Progressive!

Over at American Thinker the question was posed, “Is the Cain win an anyone but Romney vote?”  I think not. Cain is the real deal, and he’s Obama’s worst nightmare!

 

 

Share
sandstone - September 25, 2011 - (4)
 
February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Nov    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829  
OBAMA BORN A BRIT NOT LEGIT
Let's be clear. The eligibility requirement for POTUS is natural born citizen, not naturalized citizen, not native born citizen, not citizen of the United States.
Each type of citizenship has a legal definition and is very specific despite the attempts by Team Obama, the co-conspirators in the judiciary, Congress, and the MSM to conflate the terms and bastardize the Presidency.
PANCREATIC CANCER
What if pancreatic cancer strikes your family? Your donation will help fight this deadly disease.
Increase your website traffic with Attracta.com
EXTREME TRACKING
eXTReMe Tracker
copyright

MyFreeCopyright.com Registered & Protected

  • @mashable Thanks for the heads up on the commercials 23 hours ago
  • Hey, why is everyone so snarky? I thought the half time show was terrific. Better than a lot of them 1 day ago
  • mittens comment about making the moon the 51st state shows what as ass he is 6 days ago
  • Newt is absolutely correct about developing the moon's resources most especially H3 1 week ago
  • 3 States taking Obama off ballot until he can prove his eligibility, GA, MA, and IL! 1 week ago

Welcome , today is Tuesday, February 7, 2012
This blog is monetized using Are-PayPal WP Plugin SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline