Share
  •  
  • Hillary Clinton (81)
  • Page2

VATICAN TO OBAMA – FORGET CAROLINE KENNEDY’S APPOINTMENT

(H/T to No Quarter)

Months ago, I asked how the Catholic Kennedys could support BHO given his position on abortion.  I never understood why Caroline & Ted Kennedy were such open and ardent supporters of Obama’s presidency.  They are visible members of one of America’s most Catholic families.  One would think that Obama’s statement that he didn’t want either of his daughters “punished” with a baby if they made a mistake would have been enough to give them pause.

Apparently Caroline Kennedy’s support of Barack has come at a price.  My question is how tone deaf can Obama and Caroline both be?  Obama supports partial birth abortion and it is now being reported that Caroline supports abortion as well.  Is anyone surprised that the Vatican nixed the appointment?

In an article in the Telegraph UK is reporting:Barack Obama Campaigns Ahead Of Super Tuesday

Vatican blocks Caroline Kennedy appointment as US ambassador

The Vatican has blocked the appointment of Caroline Kennedy as US ambassador, according to reports.

Vatican sources told Il Giornale that their support for abortion disqualified Ms Kennedy and other Roman Catholics President Barack Obama had been seeking to appoint.

Mr Obama was reportedly seeking to reward John F Kennedy’s daughter, who publicly gave her support to his election bid. She had been poised to replace Hillary Clinton as New York senator, but dropped out amid criticism that she lacked enough experience for the job.

The Italian paper said that the Vatican strongly disapproved of Mr Obama’s support for abortion and stem cell research. The impasse over the ambassadorial appointment threatens to cloud his meeting with the Pope during a G8 summit in Italy in July.

Ms Kennedy, 53, has said that she supports abortion. Raymond Flynn, a former US ambassador to the Vatican, said earlier this week that Ms Kennedy would be a poor choice.

Hey Caroline, you know the old joke . . . “What do you call a Catholic that picks and chooses what they want to believe?   . . .   a Protestant.” Sorry, ’bout the joke, but how ( in your wildest dreams) did you think the Vatican could possibly welcome your ambassadorship?  Your  public position  supports abortion (OK, call it pro-choice if you want to) and  is in direct opposition to a basic tenant of the Catholic Church which supports all life.   I mean really, when are you going to stop drinking that Kool-Aid?

First it was your ill fated attempt at taking  Hillary Clinton’s Senate seat and now this.  I’d think long and hard before before making another public mis-step. Your public persona is tarnished enough.  I loved your father and your brother . . . admired your mother greatly . . .  I’m wondering, ” What can you be possibly be thinking?”  Like I said,  you should think long and hard before you make another mis-step.

Share

TROLL! J’ACCUSE – FALSELY ACCUSED – PART I

A few days ago I posted this under the title Can One be PUMA and a FReeper at the Same Time. Yesterday I realized that what I am discussing is much larger than a site administrator suddenly revoking someone’s posting privileges without any notice and completely out of the blue or my bruised feelings about the unjust accusation. Hence the title change.

This is really about us. All of us . . . closing ourselves off into little groups, hurling accusations, like spit balls, at people and ideas we don’t agree with. As you read this. Ask yourself how many ideas you are really giving a fair voice to?

For months, the answer to that question has been yes, as it relates to me. That all ended two days ago, when my posting privileges at Free Republic (where FReepers come from if you don’t know) were suspended for being a troll. A troll! AN OBAMA TROLL? WHAT KIND OF TROLL?

Need I say that I was stunned? Anyone that continues to visit this site knows my positions on faux President Obama and his ineligibility of hold the office of POTUS, the new age phony Democrats, my support of Sarah Palin, and host of other topics that continue to plague this country. Taking about plagues, we can put Princess Pelosi, Haughty Reed, Piggy Schumer, and Barfy Frank in that class. Scratch the word “class” none of these people have any class . . . replace that with cabal.

For those who have never heard of Free Republic, it is a conservative site where “true believers” and Reagan Republicans come to blog and share information. Some have called it a rabid den full of conservative loonies, not me, but guess who? Before going any further, if anyone wants to jump ugly about either PUMA’s or Freepers, don’t. This is not meant to be disparaging of either group!

I, on the other hand, found it to be a place that welcomed me, a fierce moderate (something I share with Benjamin Franklin), a Hillary supporter, and a one time Democrat. Point of fact, they found me before I found them. I’d never heard of them and probably would have never sought this group out on my own. So how did the relationship happen?

When reviewing the blog stats for this site, I continued to see numerous hits from the Free Republic site. Hmmm . . . who were these people? Freepers were reading what I had to say on a daily basis. After visiting their site and with a little trepidation, I joined the group because I found I agreed with most (not all) of their positions. (Candidly, I’m always a little suspicious of people that claim to hold every position I hold. That’s not possible and anyone who claims to hold identical thoughts with you all the time is either lying to themselves or lying to you.)

Yes, I joined a group with the dreaded “C” word . . . no not that “C” word you fool . . . Conservatives. What I found were smart, savvy, to the point, and in your face people who dislike the direction our country has taken, as much as the PUMA’s do. Yes, I am a PUMA and proud of it.

So, what could be the problem since both groups that I associate with share a love of country, a belief that the Constitution is of paramount importance . . . that it is the life blood of this country and that our country’s continued greatness is dependent upon adherence to the Bill of Rights, the Declaration of Independence, and the documents that form our most perfect Union.

The only thing I can figure out is I have second blog that has a very tiny following. It is called Say No to Plastic which I will get back to in a minute. It couldn’t have been my last post at Hillary and me, which focused on an update on Obama’s abilities to declare martial law. SO, I’m guessing this is the reason because I really don’t know. I immediately sent an email to the site administrator asking what I had done that caused the equivalent of my being guillotined in France. The response I received was:

{{Sound of crickets}} Bueller? Bueller? Hello . . . is anyone there?

Yup, no response from the administrator of a group that should represent respectful freedom of speech and thought . . . one would think anyway. Not a word …. Zippo, zero, zilch, nada.

Tomorrow, more in Part II.

Share

TO THE INTERNATIONAL MEDIA – A PRETEND PRESIDENT OBAMA PLACES THE CITIZENS OF THE WORLD IN PERIL

Memo: To the International Media

Re: Constitutional Crisis/President Elect Obama not Eligible to Serve as United States President

Date: January 14, 2009

In one week, Barack Obama will place his hand on the Lincoln bible to be sworn in as the 44th President of the United States (POTUS). When he places his hand on the Lincoln bible and swears to uphold the Constitution of the United States he may knowingly be committing fraud and usurping the most powerful office in the world.

The United States of America is faced with a Constitutional crisis of gigantic proportions; one that remains avoidable if Obama would simply release the growing list of documents that would verify that he indeed is a natural born citizen, a requirement for office of POTUS under the U.S. Constitution. Most of the people in our country and the world do not know what is happening because the mainstream media in our country has failed to do their jobs. The MSM have steadfastly refused to investigate any story that possibly reflects in a negative manner on Obama’s candidacy and his eligibility under the Constitution.

Outlets one would think would at least give the story a cursory glance like FOX News and the Drudge Report have remained conspicuously silent. The cable networks, venerable institutions like the New York Times and the Washington Post having been playing a game of “if we don’t report it, it doesn’t exist!”

obamacolblockkey3

 

Our Constitution requires that any person running for the office of president meet three qualifications; he/she must be at least 35 years of age, must live in the United States for at least 14 years and be a natural-born citizen. Mr. Obama has refused to provide any information that verifies he meets this requirement. In fact, it has been reported that Obama and his legal teams have spent close to one million dollars to keep his birth certificate and the truth hidden. A partial list of hidden Obama documents include; a vault copy of his birth certificate (under seal in Hawaii), college records, copy of his college thesis, records of his clients when practicing law in Illinois, explanation of his travel to Indonesia when Americans were not allowed to travel there, etc.

Mr. Obama’s own website states he was born with dual citizenship; that is an automatic disqualification. Actually, his citizenship was determined by his father who was Kenyon and a British citizen. Since his mother was 17 (and under age) her citizenship could not be passed to Obama at the time of his birth.

Further complicating the situation is Obama’s step-father was Indonesian. The evidence (that hasn’t been scrubbed from the Internet) shows that Obama went to school in Indonesia at a time when only Indonesian citizens were allowed this privilege and further that Obama traveled to Indonesia in the 80′s when American citizens were not allowed to travel to this country. What this means is that under this story of who Obama’s birth father was, he is not a “natural born citizen” as defined by our Constitution (born on U.S. soil of two parents both of whom are U.S. citizens) and therefore ineligible to hold the office of POTUS.

The reason why you should care should be self-evident. It has been said that when American catches a cold the rest of the world should watch out for pneumonia. The world wide financial recession is a case in point. If it is discovered that Mr. Obama was never eligible to run and hold the office of POTUS we, our country and the interconnected world, will be thrown in a state of disorder and turmoil. That is because any law, any treaty, any action taken under the Obama administration would be illegal. For a further explanation see Dr. Edwin Vieira detailed analysis.

 

There are (over 17) lawsuits that have already been brought across the country including several before the Supreme Court; all dismissed thus far on legal issues of standing and the like, but not on the merits of the lawsuits! See Donofrio v Wells, Berg v Obama, Kerchner v Obama & Congress for the most prominent lawsuits.

 

Let me point out that while the MSM in this country have abdicated its responsibility to voters here and Obama supporters abroad, the blogs on the Internet have been tracking this for months. Those blogging are not on the fringes or carry any animus towards Obama. There are thousands and thousands of us who love our country and are simply asking for the truth. We are moderates, former Obama supporters, conservatives, independents, Democrats, Republicans, and persons of every stripe who believe in placing our country before any individual man or party.

Finally, it should be noted that there have been a few stories written by sources outside the U.S. in Canada and elsewhere asking about Obama’s eligibility. The most disturbing is a recent article that appeared in Pravda RU which detailed Obama’s problems and which called him an outright fraud and which leads me to the most serious consideration. It is an embarrassment that Pravda is covering what our own media has purposely ignored.

Quoting from Dr. Vieira:

Fifth, as nothing but an usurper (if he becomes one), Obama will have no conceivable authority to make Treaties, or to nominate, and appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the Supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not otherwise provided for in the Constitution (Article II, Section 2, Clause 2). And therefore any Treaties or nominations and appointments he purports to make will be void ab initio, no matter what the Senate does, because the Senate can neither authorize an usurper to take such actions in the first place, nor thereafter ratify them.

Sixth, and perhaps most importantly, Congress can pass no law while an usurper pretends to occupy the Office of President. The Constitution provides that every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States (Article I, Section 7, Clause 2). Not to an usurper posturing as the President of the United States, but to the true and rightful President. If no such true and rightful President occupies the White House, no Bill will or can, before it become a Law, be presented to him. If no Bill is so presented, no Bill will or can become a Law. And any purported Law that the usurper approves and signs or that Congress passes over the usurper’s Objections, will be a nullity. Thus, if Obama deceitfully enters office as an usurper, Congress will be rendered effectively impotent for as long as it acquiesces in his pretenses as President.

If Pravda RU is calling Obama a fraud before his inauguration, how long before enemies of this country figure out this can be used as a reason not to cooperate with the U.S. or sign a treaty, or do anything that moves negotiations forward on any front because an illegally elected/ineligible Obama’s actions would be null and void . . . unenforceable . . . worthless. How long before Iran, or Hamas, or Russia, for that matter, figures this out and refuses to deal with the U.S.because of the Pretend President?

All of our institutions, have let us down. We are all in peril until this has been straightened out!

Share

THE OBAMA CONSPIRACY – PART ONE- MISSING THE POINT

Ah, conspiracies. Funny how that word has become one of the latest derogatory tools used by the Obama acolytes to metaphorically club anyone who opposes Obama. Take a principled stance against all that Obama and his campaign represent and be prepared to be accused of being a “tin foil” wearing conspiracy loon.

The truth is, conspiracies come in all sizes and shapes. Some conspiracies are well thought out . . . others, I submit, evolve and grow out of circumstances, timing, luck, happenstance. Do I believe there is/was an Obama Conspiracy? Yes, I do, but not the traditional plot one usually thinks of or reads about in novels.

When Obama began his run for the presidency, I’m not sure he thought he would actually capture the nomination. Hillary was the strongest of the Democratic contenders with more experience and street creds than BHO. When things began to change, particularly after the South Carolina primary, I think a loose confederation of conspirators began to assemble. I’m betting they didn’t think of themselves as conspirators while they schemed and plotted. After the Obama camp played the race card on the Clinton’s and it looked like Obama was going to take the black vote from Hillary, I think this loose confederation of Clinton haters (too strong a word?) got together and decided Obama was a better bet than Hillary.

Once the race card was hurled at the unsuspecting Clinton’s and their game was compromised, it became easier and easier for former Clinton supporters to jump ship. Some, like Bill Richardson, were always weasels. Others, like Dee Dee Myers were a surprise. The Clinton’s former press secretary was nothing more than weasel waste. Who knew? There were others like the Kennedy’s who also did a 180 degree turn on Bill and Hillary and never looked back.

Once the rats began jumping ship, I believe at some point the majority knew Obama had Constitutional eligibility problems and didn’t care. You cannot tell me that this group, of (supposedly) savvy political pros, many who hold law degrees themselves, were completely unaware of the fraud Obama was perpetrating on the voters of this country. They looked the other way because not being defeated by the Republicans was all they cared about . . . that and not risking having another Clinton White House with the possible dredging up of past Clinton sins the MSM would have another swing at. Why risk hearing and wincing about impeachment, or the Rose Law Firm, or Whitewater yet again?

So, Barack was born a British citizen, or Kenyon, or whatever . . . right? So what! Who, pray tell, will know the difference? Besides, who but a handful of scholars and lawyers actually knows what Article II Section 1 specifies? Why risk more Clinton controversy and scandal? Why, indeed.

Ironic, don’t you think . . . not wanting to risk more controversy. Obama hasn’t been officially declared President Elect by the Electoral College, the inauguration is weeks away and there are multiple lawsuits in 17 states & front of the Supreme Court questioning Obama’s eligibility to hold the office. Last week, another bomb shell. We have the selling of Obama’s Senate seat by Governor Blagojevich. Now we are asked to believe that Obama had no knowledge that the Chicago politician he supported for numerous years was engaged in this practice. Remember when Reagan was called the Teflon President? Obama has him beaten by a mile. As usual, the MSM is nowhere to be found. Still looking to find more incriminating Palin dirt, I suppose.

When one steps back and tries to put the election of 2008 into some kind of perspective, it is hard not be saddened and sobered by the spectacle of hosts politicians, voters, and the media stepping outside of reality, trashing our Republic . . . all for the sake of one man. They have put him ahead of everything we are supposed to hold dear. They have put him ahead of truth, of honesty,of common sense.

A few weeks ago I heard Zbigniew Brzezinski on MSNBC’s Morning Joe, say that Obama was our universal hope! As those words spilled out of Brzezinski’s mouth, I thought, “have you lost you friggin mind?” Brzezinski talked about Obama with the kind of glowing terms usually reserved for one’s savior , not a slick politician. Such is the madness surrounding the candidacy and nomination of Obama to the office of POTUS .

There is no doubt that Barack Hussein Obama is gifted . . . some would say charmed, but he is but a mere mortal of a man . . . in some ways a blank slate upon which millions have projected their hopes and dreams.

As the myth of the man has been separated by the reality of his actions and the betrayals of our political system by Team Obama, Howard Dean & the DNC, and Senators like Claire McCaskill and a legion of others, a group a patriot bloggers have stood fast trying to preserve our Constitution.

We are from varied political backgrounds, having supported different candidates and philosophies in the past, we are united in our passion to hold Obama accountable! This passion is not born out of hatred for the man as many in the media and elsewhere would have you believe. My guess is that many supported Obama for a time, but simply couldn’t swill down enough Kool-Aid to look past the deception and dishonesty of his campaign.

We live in a world of “sound byte politics” with an entire generation under 30 that thinks in that superficial manner. There are no deliberative politics shown to this group of voters. All they know is the sound of another condescending quip, like “birthers” . . . the newly minted descriptor used for the patriot bloggers who have repeatedly pressed for Obama to present the credentials necessary to prove his eligibility to hold the office of POTUS as detailed in Article II Section 1 of the Constitution.

To those who accuse us of hating Obama, of wearing tin foil on our heads, of creating controversy and conspiracies where none exist, here is the point you are missing. We are fighting the good fight because of principles, because our “most perfect union”, our Republic is and must remain greater than any one man.

When Obama’s reign is over (assuming he is inaugurated & places his hand on the Bible as he swears to uphold the Constitution) what will we be left with? We must fight to make the those people we have entrusted to make the laws also follow the laws! No one is entitled to ignore any law because of convenience or because they disagree with it. That’s the point!

The Framers of our Constitution fought and thought long and hard about the nature and structure of our country. Those who have chosen to side-step this great document upon which our country and our liberties are built . . . you should be ashamed of yourselves.

Share

PRINCESS PELOSI

How is it, that this country is saddled with the likes of Princess Pelosi? Tens of thousands have lost their jobs and will loose their homes this year, we are being asked to sacrifice while Princess Pelosi lives it up in style. Hard to believe this dullard is third in line for presidential succession.

Hat tip to Bud Simmons for bringing this warm engaging photo to our attention.

And she has the balls to confront the Big Three CEOs for flying their corporate jets to Washington!

Nancy Pelosi, Democrat from California, current Speaker of the House. The Pentagon provides the House speaker with an Air Force plane large enough to accommodate her staff, family, supporters, and members of the California delegation when she travels around the country. But, Pelosi wants routine access to a larger plane. It includes 42 business class seats, a fully-enclosed state room, an entertainment center, a private bed, state-of-the-art communications system, and a crew of 16. Pelosi wanted “carte blanche for an aircraft any time”, including weekend trips home to San Francisco. Pretty nice but very expensive perk! Her Air Force C-32 costs approximately $15,000 an hour or approximately $300,000 per trip home.

pelosi_queen_nancy

Maybe I should giving awards to the political hack with the most chutzpah. For those in search of a definition of chutzpah see “balls”. Remember how she told us, “We believe America should work for everyone – not just the privileged few – by building opportunity and prosperity for all and guaranteeing real security.” AH, yes . . . Change we can believe in.

Share

WILL THE SUPREME COURT HAVE THE COURAGE TO ENFORCE THE CONSTITUTION ON DECEMBER 5TH?

In less than 24 hours the Supreme Court will meet in a closed session to discuss the merits of Donofrio v. Wells. America will see if the Supreme Court has the courage to enforce the Constitution of the United States of America.

We are either a nation of laws that are to be respected or we have morphed into something very different . . . a hybrid of the vision the men and women fought and died for building this country. There cannot be any compromise when it comes to the sacredness of these documents and our obligation to adhere to them.

20081128040352-juxoonlahfxvpirky
HAT TIP TO ZAPEM

This is especially true as it relates to the eligibility of the men and women who want to run for the office of President.To those who have sought to end run the Constitution by allowing Obama to run for this office without the proper vetting, I hold nothing less than utter contempt for you. At some point numerous people knew he was ineligible and chose to look the other way.

But hey, that’s to be expected when 44% of our public officials cannot pass a basic civics test. How can they be expected to follow the Constitution when they are so ignorant of the laws that bind us together as a nation?

How many times have we been told if you don’t like the laws as they are written, change them. One’s dislike for the appropriateness of a law has no bearing on whether a person has an obligation to follow the law. We have spent weeks discussing Article II Section 1 of the Constitution and the meaning of what constitutes a natural born citizen.

It started with Obama’s eligibility and grew into the spectacle of watching scores of lawyers and public officials willfully ignoring the law. As the story has unfolded, the creeping lawlessness and utter disregard of the Constitution has also been exposed. Months ago, bloggers began digging for the truth because Obama and his camp of cover-up pals refused to produce basic documentation about his life, background, qualifications to run for the office of president. We were forced to do the job that countless numbers of public and party officials did not do.

The Obama cover-up wasn’t singular and wasn’t accomplished in a vacuum. It now seems to be part of a larger picture of negligence and disregard that also included other candidates running for the same office. As the layers of this story have been peeled away we found out McCain had his own set of eligibility problems.

Now turns out that Bill Richardson was also never eligible to run for president. Say what? Seems Richardson is Mexican-American bipatride and a natural born Mexican citizen, or national under the Mexican Constitution! Did the MSM media report this, of course not? Seems to me that if there is a conspiracy it is one that has grown out of the desires of numerous people who have simply decided that Article II Section 1 can be ignored and the Framers of the Constitution be damned

The Donofrio v Wells lawsuit exposed the fact that the New Jersey Secretary of State certified that Barack Obama (born a dual citizen) John McCain (born in Panama), and Roger Calero (born in Nicaragua) all met the eligibility requirements to run and hold the office of president. Imagine, not one of these candidates met the “natural born citizen” requirement as spelled out in the Constitution and the Secretary of State of New Jersey certified they were all eligible!

The Supreme Court is now faced with a cancer, a malignancy gone wild, because so many government officials, policy makers, party officials and candidates have simply chosen to ignore the law, look the other way . . . do what they damn well pleased!

To which I say, which law or part of the Constitution do we ignore next; the vote for women, or emancipation, or freedom of the press, or the right to bear arms? Which one do we ignore next? Which one?

Share

THE OBAMAS FIRST FAUX PAS – BEHOLD AMERICA’S NEW FIRST FAMILY

In a campaign where nothing has been left to chance, we have America’s new First Family, the Obamas, all decked out in red and black! When I looked at this picture this morning, I thought the choice of clothing colors was a bit odd. Really, who puts black on a little girl and why red & black on the all four of the Obamas?

Why this combination of colors, when surely the campaign has been planning what the first photographs of the incoming faux president and his family would look like for weeks? Even the criss/crossed material on Michelle’s dress seemed odd to me. I had to dig a little deeper.

Think about it. Don’t we always see politicians in shades or combinations of red, blue, navy, etc. Examples that quickly come to mind include Nancy Reagan’s red dresses, Hillary’s many shades of blues dresses and pantsuits, Laura Bush her many shades of blue and royal blue . . . the men follow the same the same etiquette. Why, because subliminally we are supposed to think of the red, white, and blue in our country’s flag. I didn’t have to dig very deep . . . here’s the answer.

red-black


Black and red bisected symbolism

The red-and-black flag is the symbol of the anarcho-syndicalist and anarcho-communist movements. Black is the traditional color of anarchism, and red is the traditional color of socialism. The red-and-black flag combines the two colors in equal parts, with a simple diagonal split. Typically, the red section is placed on the top-left corner, with the black on the bottom-right corner of the flag. This symbolizes the co-existence of anarchist and socialist ideals within the anarcho-syndicalism movement, and to symbolize the more socialistic means of the movement leading to a more anarchistic end.

The CNT-FAI‘s version of the red-and-black flag

One of the most famous variations of the anarcho-syndicalist flag is that of Spain‘s Confederación Nacional del Trabajo (National Confederation of Labor, CNT), which still exists today. The CNT, along with the Federación Anarquista Ibérica (Iberian Anarchist Federation, FAI), a major militant faction within the CNT, was a major player in the popular anarchist movements in Spain of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. This group has its own version of the red-and-black flag with its initials on the flag. CNT is in the red, while FAI is in the black – the color of anarchy – as the FAI was founded in 1927 to keep the CNT dedicated to anarchist principles.

Black and Red Africa – Zabalaza Federation’s logo

Another variation on the red-and-black theme is the red-and-black Africa used mostly by the Zabalaza Anarchist Communist Federation (ZACF or ZabFed), a federation of anarchist groups in South Africa. ZabFed was inspired by the Organisational Platform of the Libertarian Communists. ZabFed members share a basic agreement in terms of theoretical and tactical unity, collective responsibility, and federalism as suggests by the Platform. In historical terms the Platformist tradition starts with The Organizational Platform of the Libertarian Communists, and in the post-war period many include documents like the Georges Fontenis’ pamphlet Manifesto of Libertarian Communism

Lest anyone think that campaigns and politicians don’t understand the importance and symbolism of the use of color in their campaigns, has anyone forgotten Hillary’s orange pantsuit the night of her speech at the Democratic Convention in August?

orange-pantsuitAt the time, I thought that was an odd choice too, until I realized that orange is a color of protest. HRC was so cool, protesting her unfair treatment by the DNC’s selection of Obama in her orange suit, and it went over most people’s heads. Way, to go, girl! It’s just one of the reasons we loved you!

Memo to the Obama team: the choice of red & black clothing for this all important introduction to the American people was either one of the dumbest moves I’ve ever witnessed, or was incredibility insensitive to the history of this country, or was intentional.

You may want to remember that the last time the world had to deal with a charismatic leader capable of keeping millions of people mesmerized with his rhetoric, his iconic symbol, also in red and black, looked like this . . .

150px-nazi_swastikasvg




Share

OBAMA & DNC CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS-BERG FORCED TO HEAD TO SUPREME COURT -IS OBAMA ELIGIBLE TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT?

How many Americans do you think have heard about this story? We are 5 days away from the general election and incredibly we do not know if Barack Obama is eligible to run for the office of President of the United States.

Today Philadelphia attorney Phillip Berg, a Democrat and former Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania is heading to the Supreme Court, in hopes that a decision will be handed down forcing the DNC and Barack Obama to produce the vault birth certificate that finally proves once and for all, whether or not Barry Sotero, aka Barry Dunham, aka Barack Hussein Obama is natural born citizen and whether he was ever eligible to run for office of any kind.

The silence of the MSM on this blockbuster story, a story with profound issues that go directly to the heart of the Constitution remains stubbornly under reported, unless a person happened to catch this story on the Toledo TV station.

YouTube Preview Image

When history traces back to the “death of journalism” this will be one of the stories that will be brought up, dissected, and marveled at, along with stories like the Obama “Truth Squads” in Missouri. For by not reporting the legion of legitimate Obama stories, the MSM has gelded itself, rendered the Fourth Estate impotent. What is worse, is that these unreported Obama stories are potent lies of omission . . . the very worst kind of lies . . . because these types of lies require forethought!

Even if one thought the Berg v Obama case was frivolous, that Berg was a whack job, this story is at least as important as the one about Hillary’s Pennsylvania campaign spending $30,000.00 on Dunkin Donuts. (she said facetiously, should anyone miss the sarcasm) But this isn’t about donuts, this is about democracy. This is about Howard Dean, the DNC, and Obama knowingly foisting an ineligible candidate on America . . . a candidate, BTW, some have likened to the Manchurian Candidate. This is about the 18 million Hillary voters whose rights have already been abridged.

sidebar: Mr. Berg why aren’t you suing on behalf and Jane & John Doe and the already disenfranchised 18 million voters who would be voting for their candidate of choice, Hillary Rodham Clinton, instead of the impostor Obama? Doesn’t that give us standing? This injury has already come to pass. Seems to me that Judge Posen’s quote in the ruling just handed down by presiding judge in round one of Berg v. Obama fits us to a tee. Judge Posen said in part:

[...] Desire does not create standing . . . It must be more direct and immediate. It must (at least) resemble the type of injury that would support a lawsuit under traditional principles of common law or equity; it must therefor affect one’s possessions, or bodily integrity, or freedom of action (emphasis mine.)

It must, in short, be fairly describable as an injury personal to the plaintiff – a deprivation of his rights.

To which I would argue . . . HELLO . . . haven’t I already been deprived of my right to vote for HRC, a candidate we know meets the Constitutional requirements to run for office of POTUS?

According to Edwin Vieira, Jr., in OBAMA MUST STAND UP NOW OR STAND DOWN, if it turns out Obama was ineligible from the onset of the election, he faces some very serious consequences, and it seems to me, so too those who assisted in perpetrating this fraud. He says, in part:

[...] Obama’s stubborn refusal to provide what he claims is “his own” country with conclusive proof (emphasis is mine) on that score compels the presumption that he knows, or at least strongly suspects, that no sufficient evidence in his favor exists. After all, he is not being pressed to solve a problem in quantum physics that is “above his pay grade,” but only asked to provide the public with the original copy of some official record that establishes his citizenship.

SOME OF THE CONSEQUENCES INCLUDE:

[...] Second, if Obama dares to take the Presidential “Oath or Affirmation” of office, knowing that he is not “a natural born Citizen,” he will commit the crime of perjury or false swearing (see Article II, Section 1, Clause 7). For, being ineligible for “the Office of President, he cannot “faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States,”

[...] Third, his purported “Oath or Affirmation” being perjured from the beginning, Obama’s every subsequent act in the usurped “Office of President” will be a criminal offense under Title 18, United States Code, Section 242,

[...] Eight, … if the Establishment allowed Obama to pretend to be “the President,” and the people acquiesced in that charade, just about everything that was done during his faux “tenure in office” by anyone connected with the Executive Branch of the General Government, and quite a bit done by the Legislative Branch and perhaps the Judicial Branch as well, would be arguably illegitimate and subject to being overturned when a constitutional President was finally installed in office. The potential for chaos, both domestically and internationally, arising out of this systemic uncertainty is breathtaking.

Now, at the risk of being accused of wearing tin foil on my head, so be it!

Anyone remember Biden’s warning that in 6 months there would be a crisis facing the country and many people would not support Obama’s actions even though the new Administration felt they were right? What’s to prevent a faux President Obama from declaring martial law? Thanks to Bush 43’s signing NATIONAL SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE/NSPD 51, a faux President Obama could do this at will, in the name of national security!

In another barely reported story, powerful generals from the most powerful nations in the world recently held a meeting in tiny town in upstate New York. The Army has also stationed an infantry unit inside the United States. It is the first time a dedicated unit has been given an assignment as a response force for “crowd control” and other sorts of internal tasks.

YouTube Preview Image YouTube Preview Image

Tell me again why the MSM isn’t reporting on Obama’s refusal to produce his vault birth certificate, his college transcripts, his health records . . . all the basic documentation required of any candidate for the office of president.

While you’re at, tell me if I should be adjusting the tin foil on my head or going out to arm up should there be an insurrection?

For excellent on going legal analysis Berg v. Obama see:America’s Right.

Share

VICIOUS PALIN ATTACKS – OBAMA’S SILENCE UNCONSCIONABLE

“Just words?”, Obama has intoned. Just words? I think not.

The unending and unprecedented attacks against female candidates that have the temerity to run against the “Annointed One” in this election year have gone from bad to so far over the line that Obama needs to address this overt violence against Sarah Palin. NOW!

YouTube Preview Image

This is what Obama’s silence about the vicious attacks against Sarah Palin (and Hillary before) has wrought! This video is pornographic violence and should make you ill.

The faux feminists are just as complicit with their constant attacks against Palin. I call it “Palin Envy” because Sarah Palin is everything many of these faux feminists are not . . . not the least of which is being happy within her own skin, happy with the choices she has made.

Of course, let us not forget that Palin is a Republican and pro-life, and that is what really makes her detestable to these horrid, dried up old feminists. That’s why Sandra Bernhard can call for Palin to be gang raped by 4 of Berndard’s black brothers. Vile!

Obama either denounces this overt act of video pornographic violence, or he doesn’t deserve to be president.

The actions of the man in this video need to be soundly condemned as do the Obamabots that wear Sarah Palin cunt tees. The tees and the video are symptomatic of the kind of “fascist/sexist” behavior exhibited by the Obama supporters who feel this is acceptable and the rules of civil behavior do not apply to them. Well, the rules about what constitutes acceptable behavior do apply to them!

You sir, Senator Obama, have to take responsibility for the rampant sexist behavior that is polluting the country because of your refusal to address so obvious an issue that affects over 50% of the country. Your deafening silence gives tacit approval to behavior that should rightly be condemned. You sir, set the tone of your campaign. You alone! If you can bring 100,000 people out to hear you speak, you can help turn this torrent of violent sexist behavior off!

You gave a speech about racism in this country. Now you need to step up to the plate and give a speech about sexism and violence against women. Forget yourself and your campaign for just once this election cycle!

Think about your daughters and all the girls and women across this country who will suffer if you remain silent! Violence against one women is violence against all women . . . even if you don’t agree with their political views. Be the kind of man your mother would be proud of.

Share

THE OBAMA POLICE STATE- (PART THREE) OBAMA’S ALL OUT WAR ON DEMOCRACY & THE CONSTITUTION- TAKING OUR COUNTRY BACK

If you missed parts one and two, here are the essentials. For those of you already on board, feel free to skip this first part and move to the next part.

The Obama campaign has been accused using strong arm tactics against its opponents for many months. Sadly, the details of the allegations are found almost exclusively on websites on the Internet. By contract, the MSM has been almost silent to these allegations having conducted little or no investigation.

In contrast, one need only to look at the coverage Sarah Palin has received to see how clearly the MSM supports Obama.

The situation has now reached a critical mass.

  • As previously discussed in Part One, a CBS affiliate in Missouri, (Channel 4 TV News in St. Louis) reported that some Missouri sheriffs and prosecutors had formed a “TRUTH SQUAD” to target anyone who “they” felt had engaged in misleading ad or statements about Senator Obama, most especially that he was not a Muslim.
  • Additionally, it was reported on numerous sites that Barack Obama’s presidential campaign has sent threatening letters to news agencies in Pennsylvania and Ohio to stop airing ads exposing his anti-gun record sponsored by the National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund.
  • The Obama campaign’s behavior was found to be so egregious, that on Saturday Gov. Matt Blunt issued a statement that pointing out the way in which Barack Obama had tried to intimidate his critics. saying in part:

What Senator Obama and his helpers are doing is scandalous beyond words, the party that claims to be the party of Thomas Jefferson is abusing the justice system and offices of public trust to silence political criticism with threats of prosecution and criminal punishment.


New, to me, are further allegations that Obama’s campaign suppressed a free, honest, and open election that extended to Hillary’s Clinton and the caucuses held in Nevada. This is from The Husaria

Although Hillary Clinton is now encouraging her fellow Democrats to vote for Barack Obama, she (or at least her staff) had serious concerns about the manner in which his campaign was conducting itself in Nevada. Click on the link for the complaint that Hillary Clinton’s campaign filed against Barack Obama’s campaign for what sounds a lot like election fraud and voter intimidation.

clinton_complaint12308

I have never been as disheartened about this country as I am right now, but I am also angry. Anger without thoughtful action is wasted and we have precious few days before the election.

We have a presidential candidate that has sought to suppress free speech with the kind of intimidation tactics used in a police state . . . and the MSM remains silent! It a monstrous and scandalous breach of trust of the American people by a man that, if elected, must swear to protect and uphold the Constitution of the United States.

What we have is a pattern of corruption and deception unparalleled in American history. This corruption must be exposed on a national level. Our job is to demand that the MSM take notice, and begin reporting responsibly.

We need to take action beginning today. Here are a few suggestions:

  • You can forget hoping the MSM will change and bring some balance to the campaign on their own. They won’t. Corporations operate out of self interest and if enough angry people send emails, letters, etc demanding that they cover the story about the Obama Truth Squad they will be forced to act. One letter or email is the equivalent of what 100 other people are thinking but didn’t take the time to write or send. START SENDING EMAILS AND WRITING TODAY.
  • I will be contacting ABC, CNN, NBC, MSNBC, the NY Times, and the Washington Post. The essence of my emails (since I have multiple email addresses) will be the OBAMA TRUTH SQUAD story must be covered and fairness restored to the balance of the campaign coverage.
  • The MSM will only act if they have something to loose. Let’s give them something to loose. If you currently have a subscription to TIME, Newsweek, the NY Times, your local paper (that you feel has not been reporting in an even handed manner) CANCEL IT. WRITE ACROSS THE RENEWAL THE REASON FOR THE CANCELLATION OR SEND A NOTE WITH YOUR CANCELLATION. Were you thinking of going to Disneyland (ABC’s owner)? Write and cancel the trip.

I’m also going to contact the FCC and question whether the lop sided political coverage of Obama has crossed the line into outright advocacy and is a violation of FCC rules. Glimpsing Janet Jackson’s breast for a nanosecond was obscene? The “news” coverage of Obama is obscene! The MSM has abdicated their duty to present the news. Instead the MSM has fed the public a steady and constant stream of opinion slanted to the benefit of one political (their) candidate.

I don’t know if the guilty networks’ behavior fits under an FCC violation, but if the FCC gets enough angry letters, they will have to react in some fashion.

Please do the same. Contact the FCC. Contact anyone who thinks the issues surrounding the survival of our Democracy are critical … ask them to take action. Send this “call to action” to any and all like-minded blogs, websites, and news outlets or we will all be singing our new national anthem. Take a listen.

YouTube Preview Image

Share
«page 2 of 9»
hillary ‘n me

  • Obama born a Brit,not legit. There is ample evidence many times over. 4 years wasted because Obots,MSM,GOP & others ignored the Constitution 16 hours ago
  • Breitbart site running w exc proof Obama born in Kenya.Regardless where he was born BOTH parents had to be US citizens at time of his birth. 16 hours ago
  • The Vetting - Exclusive - Obama's Literary Agent in 1991 Booklet: 'Born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii' shar.es/2N4c4 16 hours ago

No Domestic Drones;Drawing a Line in the Sand

Privacy is produced by exercising control of information about ourselves!  Jim Harper Cato Institute  May 15, 2012  Enough is enough! As a friend of mine is fond of [more]

Is Obama Building a Case for War with Iran?

We've been down this road before haven't we, only last time it was Bush and Iraq playing cat and mouse. We said they had weapons [more]

Obama; Vote for Me or My Daughters Will Have to Change Schools

The Onion gets Obama's election rhetoric spot [more]

The Cain Smear Campaign & the Elitist Cabal that Benefits

There's only one question to ask as we watch the latest assault on a political candidate that isn't the choice of the Elitist Cabal. Who has [more]

Why Are the Feds Turning Off All TV & Radio Communications on November 9th?

Why do the Feds need to test a COMPLETE communications [more]

Cain forgot to read his I'm black & I'm oppressed card

Why do black liberals and "Progressives" fear and hate Herman Cain? You tell me! MSNBC, CNN, the LSM are spending hours of programming time tearing Herman [more]

Cain Hit Piece by Politico Predictable and Unintensionally Funny

OK, I'm trying to figure out what that kind of physical gesture that wasn't overtly sexual, could be. If Cain whipped "it" out and placed it [more]

Louisiana Bans Cash Sales; Why the Government Wants to Take Your Cash

The headline screamed, "Louisiana Bans Cash!" When I heard this two days ago I thought it was a joke, but this isn't funny and it's [more]

REVOLVER

In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

George Orwell.

besides…

Herman Cain can become the Peoples President. Unlike Obama, Cain’s grassroots support is real not manufactured.

THE PEOPLES PRESIDENT 2012

Herman Cain crushed the so-called first tier candidates Mitt Romney (aka mittens) and Rick Perry in yesterday’s Florida straw poll. Cain’s win is important enough to bring international interest, with the International Business Times calling it a new race.

Surprise, surprise. surprise, (not!) the Sunday talk shows are chattering about Cain defeating Romney and Perry in the Florida straw poll.

What is left unsaid is that the real surprise to them is that the voters are not following the MSM & GOP elites narrative on who is likely to run against the fraud Obama.

Their narrative has no room for Herman Cain and so they barely/rarely cover him. Why bring attention to a man who can really turn this country around, right? And so they speak his name in whispers or not at all! All of that changed yesterday.

One of the lessons to be learned in the 2012 election is name recognition isn’t everything. It’s the message that counts! Simply put so even a Progressive “journalist” can understand, the truth will out!

What the GOP elites and the MSM fail to realize, is that they have made themselves increasingly irrelevant to the voters of America. They are as tone deaf to the voters as Obama is to capitalism.

A Cain victory over Obama is payback by the Birthers and independents for the GOP’s failure to tell the truth about Obama’s ineligibility. It is payback for knowingly leading the nation astray. Obama’s a fake and everyone knows it, with the possible exception of the most rabid Obots.

Even worse than Obama’s fraudulent presidency (Born a Brit, not Legit) has been his clear inability to perform the tasks at hand. BHO likes the pomp and circumstance. but the work needed to truly be the POTUS. God, he is such a waste, such an empty suit!

Unlike Romney (picked by Rove) and Perry (said to be NWO), Cain is not a  bought man, and that boys ‘n girls is like a breath of fresh air.  Unlike Obama, Cain thankfully is not a Progressive!

Over at American Thinker the question was posed, “Is the Cain win an anyone but Romney vote?”  I think not. Cain is the real deal, and he’s Obama’s worst nightmare!

 

 

Share
sandstone - September 25, 2011 - (4)
 
May 2012
M T W T F S S
« Feb    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
OBAMA BORN A BRIT NOT LEGIT
Let's be clear. The eligibility requirement for POTUS is natural born citizen, not naturalized citizen, not native born citizen, not citizen of the United States.
Each type of citizenship has a legal definition and is very specific despite the attempts by Team Obama, the co-conspirators in the judiciary, Congress, and the MSM to conflate the terms and bastardize the Presidency.
PANCREATIC CANCER
What if pancreatic cancer strikes your family? Your donation will help fight this deadly disease.
Increase your website traffic with Attracta.com
EXTREME TRACKING
eXTReMe Tracker
copyright

MyFreeCopyright.com Registered & Protected


Welcome , today is Friday, May 18, 2012
This blog is monetized using Are-PayPal WP Plugin SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline