Obama’s Failed Presidency Summed Up in Two Words; Let’s Pretend

SHREADING THE CONSTITUTIONWatching what has taken place in the world since Barack Hussein Obama fraudulently entered the White House has been horrific enough. Countless millions have been displaced in Syria, Yemen, Iraq, and Libya because of his meddling and inaction when most urgently needed.

Yesterday was the breaking point.Russia bombed Syrian freedom fighters instead of ISIS, thus propping Assad and strengthening IRAN.


As the U.S. leads from behind (an oxymoron if ever there was) Obama’s chaotic policy, has brought the rise of ISIS with mass murders on a scale not seen since WWII. And if all of this hasn’t been bad enough, the world has had to suffer watching the barbaric destruction of ancient sites and priceless artifacts along with the ethnic cleaning of Christians and other non-Muslim minorities.


All of this was unnecessary. All of this could have been prevented had the media, political classes, and the legal profession had been truthful about Obama’s eligibility to run for the office of U.S. president.


Instead we have Let’s Pretend that:


  1. a man whose father was British subject when he was born, making him a dual citizen at best, met the legal requirement of Natural Born Citizen for the office of POTUS
  2. his upbringing in Indonesia living in a Muslim country during his formative years, going to school and reciting Muslim prayers had no impact on his adult view of the world
  3. the Founding Fathers didn’t foresee that persons not born as Natural Born Citizens (NBC) would face the challenge of divided loyalties
  4. the person holding the single most important position in the world shouldn’t be absolutely clear that his/her loyalty belongs 100% to this country and the Constitution
  5. a community organizer and part-time Constitutional law instructor with radical friends like Bill Ayers, a man with one year in the U.S. Senate was ever qualified for the office
  6. members of both political parties weren’t aware Obama was ineligible because of their own selfish political motives … McCain, Cruz, Rubio, Jindal all ineligible
  7. progressives in politics, the media, and in the legal community haven’t been trying to eliminate the NBC Constitutional qualification for years by ignoring current laws, passing resolutions and private laws designed to side step it
  8. Obama’s draw-down of the military, cuts in defense, obsession with getting an Iran treaty at all costs, giving lip service help our Mideast allies including Jordan, Israel, the Kurds hasn’t helped Iran and strengthened Russia
  9. Obama should remain in office one minute longer!


The fraud at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue needs to resign or be removed as quickly as possible. His residency in the White House is a threat to the safety and security of this country and the civilized world.


Obama’s actions and inactions have proven conclusively his is incapable of carrying  out the duties of POTUS.

Why Trump is Correct About Birthright Citizenship

The phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” was intended to exclude American-born persons from automatic citizenship whose allegiance to the United States was not complete. With illegal aliens who are unlawfully in the United States, their native country has a claim of allegiance on the child. Thus, the completeness of their allegiance to the United States is impaired, which therefore precludes automatic citizenship.  …  Sen. Jacob M. Howard, author of the citizenship clause

Make no mistake we are finally talking about the 14th Amendment,  birthright citizenship  and its impact on the country because of Donald Trump’s bid to become president. Anchor babies have long been an issue Progressives, radical Democrats, and the MSM have deliberately down-played while ridiculing those who seek to see the Constitution properly upheld.  Those who consider themselves Constitutionalists are portrayed as racists, uncouth unpolished “nativists” deserving contempt.


Donald Trump’s entrance into the GOP race for president has once again ignited a long standing battle over the meaning of birthright citizenship between two competing groups. It may also produce an honest discussion about this critically important issue.


Hard core Progressives, believe in the theory of a living Constitution. What they really mean is selective enforcement and interpretation of the Constitution.  Put another way, if you like a law enforce it. If you don’t like a law ignore it.


Trump supporters, many in the GOP, independents, and a lesser known group of attorneys and jurists believe in enforcing the Constitution as written (original intent). What this means is if you don’t like a law change or amend it but don’t ignore or selectively enforce it!


These two camps are also aligned against each other as it relates to the Constitutional requirement of Natural Born Citizenship for the presidency. Both the NBC clause (Article II Section 1 Clause 5) and birthright citizenship (as defined in the 14th Amendment) are linked by the open borders gang. The MSM refused to cover the issue honestly and truthfully, but Trump was right about Obama’s citizenship, even if Obama’s birth certificate was a secondary issue.


Progressives, radical Democrats, print journalists, and many well-known on-air personalities/attorneys know that open borders bringing a flood of illegal immigrants intentionally dilutes U.S. citizenship. This political faction believes that the Constitution and U.S. citizenship are quaint concepts to be ignored and overturned. They talk about the rule of law and give it lip service, but rarely practice it. One of the reasons, no strike that, one of the excuses used is the Constitution is just so darn hard to change through the amendment process!


Attorneys and liberal professors from the country’s most prestigious law schools are in the ranks leading the charge.  The MSM’s legal Constitutional experts on speed dial are blowing smoke, conflating the issues and intentionally lying.  These Constitutional lawyers  get away with twisting the truth because way too much deference is paid to them, most of it undeserved. They are corrupt propagandists who get away with their mendacity because too few of us take the time to actually go to the source (ahem, the Constitution and its amendments) and read what is written.


All of which brings us to Donald Trump’s run for the presidency, his campaign launch and his position on birthright citizenship.


When the 14th Amendment was passed, it was after slavery had been declared unconstitutional. The Civil War had ended but many Southern Democrats continued to continue the battle under the cover of states’ rights. At that time in our history there were many states trying to limit the citizenship rights of the newly freed slave population with Jim Crow laws.


The 14th Amendment as passed was designed to grant citizenship to and protect the civil liberties of recently freed slaves. Granting citizenship to native-born black Americans and their children in this manner prevented states from “denying or abridging the privileges or immunities” of all U.S. citizens.  The 14th Amendment  gave the newly freed slaves, now U.S. citizens equal protection under the laws of our country.


The key phrase in the 14th Amendment is “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” and it is what provides that U.S. citizenship is intended for those lawfully in the country, under the jurisdiction of its laws and those who can legally claim allegiance to the U.S.


Those native born in other countries and their children, under the jurisdiction of the laws of their native country and without allegiance to the U.S. are not  guaranteed automatic citizenship by virtue of placing their feet on U.S. soil as the open borders crowd would have you believe.


The good news is Trump has forced the GOP, the Democrats, and the MSM to bring the kind of focus birthright citizenship deserves. The bad news, however, is the open door policy espoused by the Obama administration especially in the last seven years has placed our country in danger.


Sadly, the use and misuse of the 14th Amendment has been going on for over 100 years. It has become the go-to amendment for the Supreme Court to use for cases having absolutely nothing to do with ensuring the rights and ensuring the protection of native-born black citizens of this country.


The equal protection clause which  provides for equal protection under the law for life, liberty, and property has been used for everything from whether a state statue a state statute can prohibit counseling on birth control to married couples Griswold v. Connecticut to the recent case upholding same sex marriage in all 50 states Obergefell v. Hodges.


In truth, the 14th Amendment has gone from post Civil War reconstruction legislation to a club used by Progressive politicians and their friends on the Court to find new rights never enumerated or conceived of by the framers of the Constitution.


Obama’s Failed Presidency

This picture might be funny if it weren’t so tragically accurate and pathetic.

If the truth be told, I predicted that Obama would turn out to be worse than Carter…in December of 2009!

Sadly, these wasted four years were easy to predict. His so-called soaring rhetoric always left me cold.

He is so clearly an empty suit, a glib pretender whose ascendancy was aided and abetted by the MSM, many members of Congress, and the courts. This group of actors continues to cover for him and his disastrous policies.

He surrounded himself with Chicago political hacks like the Iranian born Valerie Jarrett, bullies like Rahm Emanuel, and tax cheats like Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner. Oh, and let us not forget the most corrupt Attorney General since John Mitchell, Eric Holder now in contempt of Congress for refusing to tell the truth about Fast & Furious.

He dissed the Congress and the Constitution issuing the greatest number of presidential directives and executive orders of any president in our history. His dissed our friends and allies and made friends with out enemies.

He trashed NASA’s space program so now our astronauts have to hitch a ride on Russian rockets to get to the space station the US built! In the process we also lost 7000 thousand precious jobs.

The economy is in a shambles and getting worse. The debt is close to $16 TRILLION dollars. His $800 billion stimulus was doomed to fail from the beginning, lacking direction, focus, and accountability!

He then shoved ObamaCare through the Senate with bribery, lies, and chicanery and despite the public’s universal hatred of the plan. Now officially a tax according to the Supreme Court, it remains one of the most despised pieces of legislation in our history with 60% of the public angry and against it.

Last month 163,00 thousand jobs were created. Team Obama is spinning the number like it was some great accomplishment when in fact it underscores his economic failures. In the healthy economies of the past, the country created 350,000 jobs every month!

I haven’t touched upon the unemployment rate the MSM reports at 8.3% (really 15%), or Obama’s 36 Czars (what is it that the Great Lakes Czar does exactly?), or his never ending golfing, or Michelle’s over spending, or the over regulation of everything from lemonade stands to oil fields.

Gas prices are up and US production is down while we have INCREASED our imports of foreign oil by 30%. There’s more, much, much, more. By any measure his presidency is a failure of gigantic proportions.

He has succeeded at one thing in addition to improving his golf score. He’s made Jimmy Carter look good… no easy accomplishment!


Obama Owns Supreme Court’s Decision; Obamacare is Legal as a Tax!

When is a win not a win or a tax not a tax? Or maybe I should have opined, “be careful for what you wish for, you may get it.” 

Obamacare passed constitutional muster today in a 5-4 decision written by Chief Justice Roberts. The most hated piece of legislation ever passed by the Congress is now officially the law of the land.

Yea, rah rah, maybe!

Chief Justice Roberts is either the cleverest or the most devious jurist ever. With his majority opinion in place, that Obamacare is not constitutional under the Commerce Clause, but is constitutional as a tax, Obama is stuck explaining how this contradiction in his portrayal of the law could have come to pass.

After all, didn’t Obama and is minions tell the American people countless times that Obamacare was not a tax.

This is from the White House Insider and what today’s decision means:

And the initial reports I’m getting are telling me there was a lot more clever going on inside that decision than the initial reaction will indicate. It’s the Obama Tax now.  And states were given an out.  The entire law is a big ass convoluted mess and the ruling has reinforced that fact.  Obama will have to defend something he doesn’t understand, and Romney can now sit back and just repeat over and over again “repeal-repeal-repeal”.

Oh, one other thing, it’s going to be a long, long time before Obama and the radical progressives will be able to talk about “activist judges” on the Supreme Court subverting the will of Congress and the American people.  Chief Justice John Roberts just saw to that.

No Domestic Drones;Drawing a Line in the Sand

Privacy is produced by exercising control of information about ourselves!  Jim Harper Cato Institute

 May 15, 2012 

Enough is enough! As a friend of mine is fond of saying, “I’ve had it Jack!”

Since 9/11 we’ve witnessed a series of new laws, the Patriot Act, NDAA, laws allowing warrantless surveillance, and presidential directives (Obama can order the killing of a U.S. citizen he considers a threat) all designed to strip Americans of their rights to privacy while giving the government the unabated authority to spy on us.

I stopped asking questions like, “where’s MSM on this story?” a long time ago. The answer is firmly in the Socialist hip pocket of Obama and his administration.

Besides this group has been too busy wasting our time with non-news stories covering every conceivable topic except the political decisions by our law makers & government that impart real impact on our lives. 

The FAA has authorized the use of aerial drones by law enforcement agencies , without any public discussion. The most basic question yet to be asked is where did the FAA authority come from? Certainly, not the Constitution! But never let it be said that will stop our Congress, a body that passes unconstitutional legislation all the time.

Anyone hear of H.R. 658? Thought not. The law signed by our poseur president, Obama, requires the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to “integrate drones into American airspace by 2015,”

 “Aerial drones are now used by the Texas Department of Public Safety; the Mesa County Sheriff’s Office, Colorado; the Miami-Dade County, Florida, Police Department; and the Department of Homeland Security.

Rarely, do I agree with the ACLU, but they have been on point on this issue and the NDAA. This is one area where civil libertians, conservatives, moderates and yes even progressives can agree.

Drones are high-tech instruments of war that should be banned for use in the U.S. PERIOD! Not surprisingly, the NY Times calls the domestic drones “scary and useful!”

If the “war on terror” is over, as the Obama administration recently stated, pray tell just what is the necessity for upwards of 30,000 domestic drones by the year 2020?

Common Dreams’ progressive blog has just provided the FAA’s completed list of organizations “clamoring” for drones. Prepare yourself to be surprised by who believes they need domestic drones!



This  post was originally written during the summer of 2011. Not much has changed EXCEPT our economy is worse, the country has suffered its second credit rating downgrade in one year, the debt has now exceeded $16 trillion, the real unemployment number is stuck at 16%, and the US has dropped to 7th in the world in global competitiveness. Did I mention our foreign policy is in tatters and four Americans were murdered in Libya on 9/11/2012 and we were unprepared?

You heard it here first,”It’s time we kick Obama’s ineligible black and white ass out of office!

We have a fake President surrounded by ideological Progressive extremists who hate this country and have absolutely no idea what they are doing. Our economy is in shambles as the today’s revised 1st and 2nd quarter numbers show. We’re practically broke and Alice in friggin Wonderland aka pResident Obama’s priority today was talking about increasing fuel standards in 2025! Say friggin what, the focus was on CAFE standards, not jobs or the miserable economic numbers that were reported today?

The LA Times (surprise…not!) is waxing poetic about this “landmark” deal while Rome burns. Coffee is $9 for 12 oz, gas is $4 a gallon, one CFL light bulb that is supposed to last 5 years and burns out in nine months costs as much $13.95…for one bulb!

How bad is it? The Mexicans are all going home because there’s more opportunity and job security in Mexico than here! While our unemployment rate is 9.4% (16%-25% in some areas of the country) Mexico’s unemployment rate is 4.9%!

There is a tsunami of information that anyone can access that conclusively demonstrates that Obama was never eligible to run for the office of POTUS. There are many, many sites and many experienced investigators that have dissected Obama’s long form White House birth certificate (LFWHBC) (released in April to shut Trump up) declaring it to be a 2nd rate laughably bogus document.


He’s a fake, a fraud, a nincompoop. Spin him twice around in an elevator and he’d be lost!

Peggy Noonan was right, he’s a loser! As Noonan asserts :

The secret of Mr. Obama is that he isn’t really very good at politics, and he isn’t good at politics because he doesn’t really get people.

What Noonan should have added is Obama doesn’t get America or its people either.


Obama and all those who played a direct part in foisting this incompetent Brit, supposed Constitutional professor on the American people belong in jail. What we are talking about is treason, misprision of felony, forgery, along with a list of crimes that fills many pages.

Can you say President Boehner? Removing Obama from office means our clown V.P. ,Joe Biden, must also be removed because his position was gained though an illegal political process. The next in line for the presidency according the Constitution is the Speaker of the House.




Harold Ford Jr. on Morning Joe…Obama was born outside America



Yesterday morning I happened to catch a few minutes of Morning Joe where the discussion revolved around the debt, the House Republicans, and Obama’s lack of leadership. Harold Ford was around the table debating with Pat Buchanan when he matter-of- factly stated, “The President having been born outside America…” Say what, born outside America?

Notice how not a single person acted shocked or contradicted Ford’s assertion. The conversation went on as if nothing had unusual had happened. Stunning!

Born a Brit, not legit!



(H/T) The Post & Email

So not only does Obama not have a valid social security number and valid application, but his mother’s appears to be fraudulent as well. We have no idea who these people are.  His mother does not have a valid social security number.  She obtained her social security number using falsified forms, as evidenced by the notation at the bottom of the page where it gives a revision date of 7/55.

What are the chances that Obama and his momma, Stanley Ann Dunham, would both have phony social security numbers? How ’bout slim, fat chance, and none, and yet they do!

Obama has MULTIPLE social security numbers. The one used most frequently belongs to a deceased man born in Connecticut…and yet no curiosity on the part of the cable networks (including FOX) or surprise (not!) the MSM!

Fraud runs rampant in the Obama family! Who has multiple social security numbers unless they are in witness protection or we have elements within our government designing the hidden identity and agenda of Barack Obama and his momma!

Let us not forget Obama’s father. He is just as suspect as his “son”. Harvard wanted him out, deported! Politico reported Obama Sr. was forced out of Harvard!

The following is from Anti-Mullah.



Irrefutable Proof Obama’s Mama’s Social Security Application Fraudulent: 1965 Application Form Signed In 1959. Got A Time Machine?!

One wonders why would Stanley Ann Dunham’s Social Security card be forged?

To place a verifiable signature of hers into the public record.

Then you see it would match the signature on the recently provided (forged) LFBC (Long Form Birth Certificate) by Obama and in the forged book copy in Hawaii Department of Health.

Since Stanley Anne Dunham can’t sign any documents created since she died they would have to recreate her signature and a document history to verify it.

That is: someone alive is signing for her and placing this document into the record would be the way to authenticate her signature as an ‘existing’ sample.

Now at the bottom of Dunham’s SS-5 form , it can clearly be seen that the form was Revised on 7/65 . That is quite a task as seeing that she signed the form in 1959. More on that below.

Comments added to the forms below are in bold red.



The forms look almost the same. There are just a few minor differences. They are noted in red on the forms.

Basically what they did was just switch the locations of those two areas on the forms. Unless you were looking very closely, those 2 forms would look identical. Someone not paying attention would think the 1965 form was the 1959 form.

Want More? This is from

Where does that leave us ?

1). The SS-5 form used in 1959 is a form that was revised in 1946
2). The Dunham form ( supposedly signed in 1959 ) is different from that used in 1959. In fact, it has the statement Revised 7/65 on the form. Short of using a time machine, there is no way she could have signed that in 1959.
3). It is obvious that the Dunham SS-5 form is a fake. The forger used a form that looked just like the one used in 1959, but he did not look close enough. He missed the layout change in those two fields.


For additional details concerning the letter and graph Orly Taitz received from the Social Security Administration under the FOIA read here.




OK, here’s legislation that can be hated by conservatives and liberals alike. Embed a YouTube video and you could be committing a felony. Yes, with everything that is happening in the U.S., the $14 trillion debt, the joblessness, food up, gas prices up, home starts down, and the White House wants to focus on embedding videos from YouTube!

This is from techdirt:

Okay, this is just getting ridiculous. A few weeks back, we noted that Senators Amy Klobuchar, John Cornyn and Christopher Coons had proposed a new bill that was designed to make “streaming” infringing material a felony. At the time, the actual text of the bill wasn’t available, but we assumed, naturally, that it would just extend “public performance” rights to section 506a of the Copyright Act.

This proposed legislation is White House initiated, as CNET noted on March 15, 2011;


The White House today proposed sweeping revisions to U.S. copyright law, including making “illegal streaming” of audio or video a federal felony and allowing FBI agents to wiretap suspected infringers.

In a 20-page white paper (PDF), the Obama administration called on the U.S. Congress to fix “deficiencies that could hinder enforcement” of intellectual property laws.

Victoria Espinel, the first Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator, with Vice President Joe Biden during an event last year.


The report was prepared by Victoria Espinel, the first Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator who received Senate confirmation in December 2009, and represents a broad tightening of many forms of intellectual property law including ones that deal with counterfeit pharmaceuticals and overseas royalties for copyright holders. (See CNET’s report last month previewing today’s white paper.)

Some of the highlights:

• The White House is concerned that “illegal streaming of content” may not be covered by criminal law, saying “questions have arisen about whether streaming constitutes the distribution of copyrighted works.” To resolve that ambiguity, it wants a new law to “clarify that infringement by streaming, or by means of other similar new technology, is a felony in appropriate circumstances.”

• Under federal law, wiretaps may only be conducted in investigations of serious crimes, a list that was expanded by the 2001 Patriot Act (recently renewed) to include offenses such as material support of terrorism and use of weapons of mass destruction. The administration is proposing to add copyright and trademark infringement, arguing that move “would assist U.S. law enforcement agencies to effectively investigate those offenses.”



The bill was marked up by members of the House Armed Services Committee (HASC) last Wednesday that poured into Thursday morning (2:45 a.m. to be exact).

A couple of minutes past midnight, Rep. John Garamendi (D-Calif.) offered an amendment to strike Sec. 1034 — the new authorization for worldwide war provision — from the NDAA. Visibly angry that such a large sweeping provision had not yet had any public hearing whatsoever, he vigorously characterized it as a very broad declaration of war …Washington’s Blog

This is absolutely stunning.

While all the major “news” and cable outlets, including FOX have been wasting air time on Arnold Schwarzenegger’s love child and how hurt Maria and the kids are, a bill that would give faux President Obama the authority to declare WWIII (yes, that’s what I said) along with the ability to declare war on U.S. soil has been stealthily moving through Congress.

Sources including Politico, the Daily Paul, the ACLU, and The War Room all confirm that the House Armed Services Committee finished marking up the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for 2012, which contains a dangerous provision that authorizes a worldwide war against terrorism and gives Obama unlimited powers to do so. Constitution? What Constitution?

The ACLU reports that

Republican chair of the Armed Services Committee, Howard McKeon, R-Calif., revealed The National Defense Authorization Act on Monday, which includes a bill renewing an act passed just days after 9/11, the Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF). AUMF gave then-President George W. Bush carte blanche to hunt down the 9/11 perpetrators and their allies. […] this new bill goes much further than the current authorization of war. It has no expiration date and would allow a president to use military force in any country around the world where there are terrorism suspects, even when there are no connections to the 9/11 attacks or other specific harms or threats to the United States.

According to POLITICO:

The new language drops any reference to 9/11 and “affirms” a state of “armed conflict with al-Qaeda, the Taliban and associated forces.” The measure also explicitly gives the president the right to take prisoners “until the termination of hostilities” – something the courts have found to be implicit in the current version of the AUMF, though the new proposal could be seen to extend that power.

Hard as it is to believe, debate for this bill lasted just over 10 minutes and occurred after midnight! As Washington’s Blog points out,”Of all of the powers that the Constitution assigns to Congress, no power is more fundamental or important than the power “to declare War.”  That is why, in 2002, when Congress was considering whether to authorize war in Iraq, it held fifteen hearings, and passed legislation that cited specific harms, set limits, and defined a clear objective.”

I would point out that the reason our Founding Fathers gave those powers to Congress and not the President is because war is too important to be left to one man, most especially this president, who illegally sits in the White House.

Let us not forget that Obama has already authorized “targeted assassinations” against U.S. citizens.  And let us not forget that our government can pick up anyone that they suspect may be a terrorist. Just ask the 13 year old boy that was interrogated by the Secret Service for posting something on Facebook!

Mom’s Mad Secret Service Grills 7th Grader Over Facebook Post About Obama The Blaze