I’ve been keeping my powder dry on this for three days, waiting to see if someone would come forward and spring a trap or try to fully discredit the source of the information, Tim Adams. To date no one has. In fact, the MSM has been curiously quiet!
Is it possible that those who have always sprung to Obama’s defense in the past are so disgusted and disillusioned with his performance as our Poseur POTUS that they are going to let him swing slowly in the wind?
Let me remind anyone reading this that, regardless of where Obama was born, he was never eligible to hold the office of President. He may be a naturalized citizen, but that has never been the same as a natural born citizen.
In fact, don’t believe me. This is from Ask. com discussing Obama’s own election site in 2008:
One of Obama’s official web sites,”Fight the Smears,” affirms that “When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4, 1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.’s children. Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4, 1982.”
This statement by the Obama campaign thus admits that he was a British (Kenyan) citizen at birth and thus had dual citizenship (one argument goes even if he was born in the U.S.) With dual citizenship and “split loyalties” at birth, Obama is arguably not a “natural born citizen”and is ineligible to serve as President of the United States.
Not logged in