I have repeatedly stated that Obama’s citizenship status on the day he was born and his resultant eligibility questions to be POTUS would never go away. Read this latest search and demand for the truth…
If Lynn Dartez is correct, and the AG cannot represent/defend Obama in his citizenship eligibility quagmire AND that a temporary president would have to in place, who would that temporary president be?
It cannot be McCain because he was ALSO ineligible to hold office despite Senate RESOLUTION 511 declaring him to be a NBC!
Under the law ( remember that quaint concept?) who would constitutionally qualify to be our temporary POTUS until an election?
Hillary and Sarah are constitutionally eligible to be president but were on tickets headed by ineligible candidates.
Would our temporary POTUS be Ralph Nader?
U.S.C. Title 44, Chapter 22: “PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS” Thanks Daniel Smith
Why haven’t any of you used the simple power of the United States Code mandates that are directly on point??Like, as in, uhm?.. U.S.C. Title 44, Chapter 22: “PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS“[Thank veteran Congress members for passing the Presidential Records Act of 1978]The statutory law of the United States Code is extremely clear, even often in multiple ways, that:a) the AG *cannot* represent/defend Obama in any challenge that involves a question of his citizenship, for the relevant statutory laws mandate that the AG be on the *prosecuting* side against Obama, if the AG is involved, at all… In fact, whether intentional or not, Obama and Holder can be hit with “constructive fraud”, at the very least…b) the AG also *cannot* represent/defend Senators or the Senate body, itself, in these constitutional questions, either… Again, whether intentional or not, you have that “constructive fraud” against the rule of law thing again…c) there are various statutory standings provided for even “mere” individual Citizens to sue Obama, Congress, etc.d) Obama’s “Presidential records” are expressly PUBLIC by mandate of simple written law (and, combined with using AG Holder & U.S. Attorneys, i.e., our *taxdollars*, in an expressly-unconstitutional manner, defending Obama in any citizenship issues, then Obama gets to pay back every single red cent of that $1.7+ million spent so far… plus interest and penalties, naturally… plus, getting deported, or imprisoned, or whatever else…).e) additionally, there are all sorts of various federal agencies/heads to statutorily go after Obama’s eligibility through.I have detailed and provided the direct links to all of these applicable federal statutes, below.Of course, we all know that Obama and his agents have fully admitted his dual-citizenship at birth, which precludes him from ever being President, even notwithstanding the obviously-suspicious concealment of virtually all pertinent records…Who, then, are the lawful United States Prez and VP, per the original Constitution, right now, at thisvery moment??
That’s easy enough to answer:1. Mr. John McCain, Republican, *is* the President, temporarily, until the Re-Election that must be done, promptly.2. Mr Ralph Nader, Independent, *is* the Vice-President, temporarily, until the Re-Election that must be done, promptly.(and, those two are not my personal combo pick, but that IS the result of law per the original Constitution, so fine…).
Read this post in its entirety over at Oil for Immigration. It is full of citations and enough meat for anyone to sink their legal teeth into.
P.S. Can we finally stop talking about Obama’s damn birth certificate? It is a diversion that takes away from the underlying issues that have always been in front of us.
The best case scenario for Obama is his dual citizenship, but that automatically disqualifies him for the office. Under the law, Obama’s citizenship status was determined by his father’s nationality. Since his mother was too young (under current law at the time of his birth) to confer her citizenship to her son, Obama was born a BRIT, like it or not!
I have been calling this for over a year… it has always been self evident.
Not logged in