Share
  •  
  • Archives for September 2008 (30)
  • Page2

PALIN’S PILLOW SCANDAL

MSNBC is investigating allegations that Governor Sarah Palin has been caught ripping off “do not remove” pillow tags.

Sources inside the Palin home spoke to MSNBC’s David Schuster, on the condition of anonymity fearing retaliation from the Governor. Inside sources say that Palin has a long history of tearing tags off of pillows. It is also alleged the “do not remove” tag tearing extends to cushions and comforters in addition to bedroom pillows and throws.

It is not known if, John McCain, the GOP presidential candidate was aware of Palin’s addiction prior to his selection of Palin as his running mate and choice for the office of Vice President of the United States.

This has been a busy day for Schuster, as he also broke the “tanning bed scandal” during MSNBC’s afternoon programming.

It seems soon after Palin was elected Governor of Alaska that she had a private tanning bed installed in the Governor’s mansion. Schuster reported that Palin used her own money to buy the used equipment that was eventually installed.

It is not known if Palin used her office to pressure the seller of the used equipment to get a better price, or if she used the power of her office to keep people from finding out about her addiction to tag tearing.

Schuster ended this report with the words, “I thought you should know!”


Share

PALIN & “TROOPERGATE” – MSM ON WRONG SIDE OF AN ISSUE, AGAIN!

MSNBC, CNN, and ABC News have been trying their darndest to smear Sarah Palin’s record of accomplishments in Alaska by pinning TROOPERGATE, the latest media invention, around her neck.

Not that there was any doubt, but it appears Walt Monegan, who lost his job as public safety director, was a loose cannon who refused to work with Governor Palin. In fact, Monegan behaved as if the rules applied to everyone but himself. Monegan has been crying to the media that he was fired because he refused to fire Palin’s former brother-in-law Trooper Mike Wooten . . . a man involved in a nasty divorce with her sister.

Turns out Trooper Mike Wooten is a bad guy who has admitted to Tasering his 10 year old stepson, has illegally shot moose, and was also known to drink on the job . . . this is the guy the MSM supports! Wooten says, “he may have used poor judgment.” To which my response is, “do ya think?” How dumb do you have to be?

Let’s not forget that Monegan served as a political appointee, and at the pleasure of the Governor. He had a record of insubordination and as is reported on HOTAIR the wonder is he lasted as long as he did.

According to the papers filed by Governor Palin’s legal team Monegan repeatedly tried to go around her:

  • 12/9/07: Monegan holds a press conference with Hollis French to push his own budget plan.
  • 1/29/08: Palin’s staffers have to rework their procedures to keep Monegan from bypassing normal channels for budget requests.
  • February 2008: Monegan publicly releases a letter he wrote to Palin supporting a project she vetoed.
  • June 26, 2008: Monegan bypassed the governor’s office entirely and contacted Alaska’s Congressional delegation to gain funding for a project.

Take a look at the brief filed by her attorneys and ask yourself if there is any question about firing a man who tried to ambush Palin at every opportunity.

Had it been me, I’d have fired his sorry ass a lot sooner!

Share

OBAMA -UNFIT TO BE PRESIDENT

Barack Hussein Obama apparently is of the belief, that simply running for the office gives him the right to interfere with ongoing US policy in Iraq. FOX NEWS is reporting that according a new article in today’s the New York Post that:

WHILE campaigning in public for a speedy withdrawal of US troops from Iraq, Sen. Barack Obama has tried in private to persuade Iraqi leaders to delay an agreement on a draw-down of the American military presence.

According to Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari, Obama made his demand (emphasis mine) for delay a key theme of his discussions with Iraqi leaders in Baghdad in July.

“He asked why we were not prepared to delay an agreement until after the US elections and the formation of a new administration in Washington,” Zebari said in an interview.

I urge everyone to read the entire article and then ask yourselves is this man really ready for “prime time?”

Here’s another question to ask. How is it that Obama isn’t in violation of the Logan Act? If you don’t know, the Logan Act forbids unauthorized citizens from negotiating with foreign governments.

Under whose authority was Obama acting when he approached the Iraqi leaders with this proposal? But this isn’t really new, is it?

Remember his remarks about the Canadians and free trade and NAFTA? I guess Obama’s idea of foreign relations is to tell the American people one thing, and then go behind their backs and attempt to negotiate something else.YouTube Preview Image

This man is not fit to lead this country!

Share

ABC NEWS DOCTORED PALIN INTERVIEW – NETWORK DEMONSTRATES THEY ARE NO BETTER THAN MSNBC

I‘m angry.

Like many, I thought Charlie Gibson’s interview with Sarah Palin left a lot to be desired, however, I was willing to give him the benefit of doubt. And,yes, I knew a two day interview had to edited.

Watching Gibson’s condescending, peevish approach to Sarah Palin while peering at her over his glasses was annoying enough, but what I didn’t know was the extent to which ABC Faux News edited the Palin interview to make her look foolish.

Gibson’s “gotcha question” about the Bush Doctrine was poorly stated . . . his definition incorrect . . . Palin’s answer truncated. When you look at the full interview without the edits, the only conclusion one can reach is that ABC intentionally edited Palin to diminish her make her look like a light weight.

When Gibson asked:

GIBSON: Have you ever met a foreign head of state?

What you didn’t hear was:

PALIN: There in the state of Alaska, our international trade activities bring in many leaders of other countries.

GIBSON: And all governors deal with trade delegations.

PALIN: Right.

GIBSON: Who act at the behest of their governments.

PALIN: Right, right.

When Gibson and Palin discussed Alaska and its proximity to Russia:

What you didn’t hear was:

And, Charlie, you’re in Alaska.

We have that very narrow maritime border between the United States, and the 49th state, Alaska, and Russia. They are our next door neighbors.We need to have a good relationship with them.They’re very, very important to us and they are our next door neighbor.

ABC News, the network that Peter Jennings built with his integrity and grit can no longer be TRUSTED to present the news fairly.

If you want to register a complaint with ABC News follow the this link.

While you are at it, it might be time to register a complaint with the FCC. We, the voters of this country, regardless of party affiliation deserve better than this!

Share

HOW OBAMA & THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY LOST THE 2008 ELECTION

The postmortem on how Obama & the Democratic Party lost the November ’08 election is being written 56 days before election day on November 4, 2008.

You can say you read it hear first, the same way moments after McCain picked Sarah Palin for the VP spot, I pointed out it was a brilliant choice.

Obama has lost, you know. You can’t have a 20% swing in the woman’s vote in less than 10 days, with virtually every tracking poll giving McCain the lead and think there was ever a chance.

Hear that hysterical chorus in the background? That’s the sound of the Obamabots, the elitists, the chardonnay sipping, arrugula chomping, supercilious, sanctimonious fools who really believed that “winning by any means” meant winning by tossing out all that the Democratic Party stood for . . . including 18,000,000 of its voters.

It’s not simply that McCain’s addition of Palin to the GOP ticket became a game changer like no other in recent political history. It’s that Obama and his team, and the DNC, together with the MSM (and in particular MSNBC), treated most of the voting public with disdain and derision.

One need only look to their campaign of “toughness against the McCain campaign” and ask what groups of voters didn’t they piss off in the process?

Apparently no one on the Obama side ever heard of the “effect of causal reaction” or understood that attack ads should be focused on the candidates and not tied to habits of potential voters. For example when Obama ran his campaign ads against McCain saying he was too old and technologically inept to vote for, boomers across America said, “stuff it smart ass” on their blogs and in endless messages across the Internet.

YouTube Preview Image

The Obama people turned off women, white collar and blue collar workers, working moms, small business owners, gun owners “bitterly” clinging onto their religion and weapons, people over 50, independents, long time Democratic voters, people in small towns, Hillary supporters, pro-life supporters, the majority of the country that wants to drill for oil . . . the list is endless!

The truth is, once the McCain machine really got into gear, Obama’s campaign always looked like St. Mary’s JV squad against the New England Patriots. Let’s see, the voters choices were Obama ( with no experience) and his running mate, (open mouth insert foot) Biden or the maverick McCain paired with the maverick Palin. Hands down, the change team was the GOP’s not the Dem’s as soon as Palin joined McCain.

Rather than compete by legitimately discussing issues and legitimately comparing records the Obama camp and its PR firm MSNBC, decided that personally picking apart the 17 year daughter of Sarah Palin, trying to paint Governor Palin as a conservative far to the right of Bush, and trying to make the McCain/Palin ticket a third Bush term was a better tactic. IT WAS ALWAYS A LOSING TACTIC! McCain’s style of politics have never been like Bush’s . . . and saying in over and over doesn’t make it so!

In fact, every time the media in its many forms including NY Times columnists Frank Rich, Maureen Dowd, Sally Quinn from the Post, Chris Matthews, Rachael Maddow, Keith Olbermann, Jack Cafferty, Wolf Blizter, Campbell Brown etc. etc. etc poked a stick at her family, distorted her record, and hurled a false accusation at Palin another voter left the Dem’s to vote with the GOP.

History will record that when the Democratic Party lost the 2008 election, the eighth loss in ten elections, the loss wasn’t because of Obama’s race. It was because of the hubris and lack of humility of the Dean/Brazille/Pelosi/ Reid neo-con Democrats, The Daily KO’s, HufPo, & many others including the trolling Obamabots.

History will record that never have so few listened to the voices of so many and disregarded them . . . throwing those voices and their votes into the garbage heap and then acted surprised when they lost, AGAIN!

Share

OBAMA PAYS HIS FEMALE STAFFERS LESS THAN HE PAYS THE MEN – SURPRISED? ME NEITHER! (Updated)

I wrote about this in August. Obama pays his female staffers less money than he pays the men on his staff. See More Red Meat for PUMA’s

Finally, more of the media is taking notice. This detailed article is from the Seattle Post-Intelligencer. In part it reads:

Based on these calculations, Obama’s 28 male staffers divided among themselves total payroll expenditures of $1,523,120. Thus, Obama’s average male employee earned $54,397.

Obama’s 30 female employees split $1,354,580 among themselves, or $45,152, on average. …

Again, on average, Obama’s female staffers earn just 83 cents for every dollar his male staffers make. This figure certainly exceeds the 77-cent threshold that Obama’s campaign website condemns. However, 83 cents do not equal $1. In spite of this 17-cent gap between Obama’s rhetoric and reality, he chose to chide GOP presidential contender John McCain on this issue.

Now compare this with the McCain campaign staff:

McCain’s 17 male staffers split $916,914, thus averaging $53,936. His 25 female employees divided $1,396,958 and averaged $55,878.

On average, according to these data, women in John McCain’s office make $1.04 for every dollar a man makes. In fact, all other things being equal, a typical female staffer could earn 21 cents more per dollar paid to her male counterpart — while adding $10,726 to her annual income — by leaving Barack Obama’s office and going to work for John McCain.

I want someone to tell again how the McCain/Palin ticket doesn’t represent the interests of women!

The following updated information was found over at Flopping Aces and reinforces Obama continued record of unequal pay for equal work.

DICK MORRIS’ ‘08 PLAY-BY-PLAY
Volume 1, #36
September 15, 2008

Obama has never gone out of his way to relate to women. Only seven of his top twenty Senate staff positions are filled by women (McCain has thirteen of twenty) and women on Obama’s staff earn 83 cents for each dollar his male staffers are paid. (McCain pays his female staffers $1.04 for each dollar he pays to his men).

Share

BARACK – PUCKER UP, BABY!

Just how many times are we to give Obama the benefit of the doubt? Looks like the “lipstick flap” shows us once again, how the Dem’s and Barack’s campaign just don’t get it.

Remember when Barack called that female reporter, Sweetie? Or, how ’bout  when . . . he wasn’t really “flipping off” Hillary Clinton, he was just brushing off criticism?

And now, we have the old “lipstick on a pig” routine.

I must confess I have used this saying in a post before. I first heard Ann Richards, when she was running against George Bush for Governor of Texas, make it a part of her speech. The difference is, when she said it, it was funny and her opponent had no connection or reference point to the word that people could connect.

Don’t tell me yet another lame attempt at humor by Barack wasn’t somehow planned or part of his consciousness. Remember his dumb comment about Hillary going duck hunting with a six shooter? That wasn’t funny either.

I’ve said this before. if you are going to use humor as a weapon against your opponent, you’d better have a deft hand. So tell me again, Sarah was put on the GOP ticket just because she’s a woman. Looks to me Barack just got sliced and diced!

Maybe that’s what they mean by field dressing in Alaska. Barack, pucker up, baby . . . the GOP and women across America want to give you a big SMOOCH!

Share

WHO KNEW ANN COULTER & MICHELLE MALKIN WERE SO SMART?

If you read this blog on a regular basis you know I am a political moderate, Hillary & Bill supporter, past Democrat now independent and a PUMA and proud of it.

I’m one of those white, college educated women so (newly) prized by the Donna Brazille, Howard Dean, Obama team … I’m one of the women who saw Hillary decimated by the new dirty Democratic Party who threw off the yoke of their stupidity and insane desire to win regardless of the cost of integrity, decency, and honor.

So, why quote Ann Coulter? She’s never been a friend of the Clinton’s (understatement!) or democrats or moderates, for that matter. It always seemed to me her position on everything was rigid and neo-con or else!

My opinion of her started to change last year when she along with a long list of conservatives, including FOX News defended Don Imus. Then in March, when the MSM was dumping on Hillary, Coulter was using terms like “our plucky girl Hillary” and it was clear even if she didn’t support Hillary’s politics she was in support for fair and decent treatment . . . neither of which Hillary received from most of the MSM and her own party.

Which brings me to today and a recent column of Coulter’s on John McCain’s choice of Sarah Palin. There’s a deliciously snarky comment about the idiot Olbermann, Chris (who me a misogynist?) Matthews, and MSNBC. Please read it, it’s good stuff!

As for Michelle Malkin, who’d of thunk it? Hot Air, a Malkin site, is on my blogroll! On any given day, people like myself are sure to find a few points they agree with in her posts.

Who knows if I’ll still feel this way after John McCain and Sarah Palin are elected in November, but for now this seems like a good truce!

Share

BREAK OUT THE CHAMPAGNE – MSNBC DEMOTING CHRIS MATTHEWS & THE HATED KEITH OLBERMANN

This couldn’t have happened to two finer fellows! Hear those cheers in that background? They are coming from:

  • Moderates and Independents from both parties, Republicans and Democrats
  • Women & men that are tired of the constant misogyny packaged as “political commentary”
  • IMUS supporters
  • PUMA’s and other supporters of democracy that no longer exists within the Democratic Party
  • Supporters of Hillary Rodham Clinton and women candidates everywhere
  • Viewers of every persuasion . . . tired of the partisan politics and reporting of MSNBC

The New York Times is reporting this seismic shift in programming in a new article written today. This is must read for all of us that witnessed the complete and utter downfall of MSNBC starting with the Imus firing in April of 2007. The article reads in part:

The change — which comes in the home stretch of the long election cycle — is a direct result of tensions associated with the channel’s perceived shift to the political left.

“The most disappointing shift is to see the partisan attitude move from prime time into what’s supposed to be straight news programming,” said Davidson Goldin, formerly the editorial director of MSNBC and a co-founder of the reputation management firm DolceGoldin.

Executives at the channel’s parent company, NBC Universal, had high hopes for MSNBC’s coverage of the political conventions. Instead, the coverage frequently descended into on-air squabbles between the anchors, embarrassing some workers at NBC’s news division, and quite possibly alienating viewers. Although MSNBC nearly doubled its total audience compared with the 2004 conventions, its competitive position did not improve, as it remained in last place among the broadcast and cable news networks. (surprise, surprise, surprise… and they wonder why!) In prime time, the channel averaged 2.2 million viewers during the Democratic convention and 1.7 million viewers during the Republican convention.

The success of the Fox News Channel in the past decade along with the growth of political blogs have convinced many media companies that provocative commentary attracts viewers and lures Web browsers more than straight news delivered dispassionately.

“In a rapidly changing media environment, this is the great philosophical debate,” Phil Griffin, the president of MSNBC, said in a telephone interview Saturday. Fighting the ratings game, he added, “the bottom line is that we’re experiencing incredible success.”

But as the past two weeks have shown, that success has a downside. When the vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin lamented media bias during her speech, attendees of the Republican convention loudly chanted “NBC.”

After you have read this, please visit my new blog on the impact of plastics on our environment! This is a political issue that effects everyone on the planet.

Go to Say No To Plastic.

Share

OBAMA YOU ARE SO YESTERDAY!

The conventions are finally over and after 19 months of campaigning as the “change” candidate where does Barack H. Obama find himself?

Well for starters, he’s behind in the national polls. According to the latest USA Today/Gallup poll the McCain/Palin ticket has pulled ahead of the Obama/Biden ticket by 10%.

By any standard these are impressive numbers!

Among likely voters McCain leads Obama 54% to 44%

Among registered voters McCain leads Obama 48% to 45%

I don’t suppose that anyone gave any thought to the fact that if you campaign for 19 months, that at some point you become old news to the electorate and the MSM.

Barack, with Sarah on the scene to shake things up, you are so yesterday’s news. BTW, no one has to ask “Sarah who?” I’ll bet that no one gave any thought to the fact that adding an old war horse like Biden to “change ticket” completely deflates and invalidates the concept. Nope, sure didn’t!

Among the findings:

• Before the convention, Republicans by 47%-39% were less enthusiastic than usual about voting. Now, they are more enthusiastic by 60%-24%, a sweeping change that narrows a key Democratic advantage. Democrats report being more enthusiastic by 67%-19%.

• Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, a national unknown before McCain chose her for the ticket 10 days ago, draws a strong reaction from voters on both sides. Now, 29% say she makes them more likely to vote for McCain, 21% less likely.

Obama’s choice of Delaware Sen. Joe Biden as running mate made 14% more likely to vote for the Democrat, 7% less likely.

After you have read this, please visit my new blog on the impact of plastics on our environment! Go to Say No To Plastic

Share
«page 2 of 3»
hillary ‘n me

  • Obama born a Brit,not legit. There is ample evidence many times over. 4 years wasted because Obots,MSM,GOP & others ignored the Constitution 13 hours ago
  • Breitbart site running w exc proof Obama born in Kenya.Regardless where he was born BOTH parents had to be US citizens at time of his birth. 13 hours ago
  • The Vetting - Exclusive - Obama's Literary Agent in 1991 Booklet: 'Born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii' shar.es/2N4c4 14 hours ago

No Domestic Drones;Drawing a Line in the Sand

Privacy is produced by exercising control of information about ourselves!  Jim Harper Cato Institute  May 15, 2012  Enough is enough! As a friend of mine is fond of [more]

Is Obama Building a Case for War with Iran?

We've been down this road before haven't we, only last time it was Bush and Iraq playing cat and mouse. We said they had weapons [more]

Obama; Vote for Me or My Daughters Will Have to Change Schools

The Onion gets Obama's election rhetoric spot [more]

The Cain Smear Campaign & the Elitist Cabal that Benefits

There's only one question to ask as we watch the latest assault on a political candidate that isn't the choice of the Elitist Cabal. Who has [more]

Why Are the Feds Turning Off All TV & Radio Communications on November 9th?

Why do the Feds need to test a COMPLETE communications [more]

Cain forgot to read his I'm black & I'm oppressed card

Why do black liberals and "Progressives" fear and hate Herman Cain? You tell me! MSNBC, CNN, the LSM are spending hours of programming time tearing Herman [more]

Cain Hit Piece by Politico Predictable and Unintensionally Funny

OK, I'm trying to figure out what that kind of physical gesture that wasn't overtly sexual, could be. If Cain whipped "it" out and placed it [more]

Louisiana Bans Cash Sales; Why the Government Wants to Take Your Cash

The headline screamed, "Louisiana Bans Cash!" When I heard this two days ago I thought it was a joke, but this isn't funny and it's [more]

REVOLVER

In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

George Orwell.

besides…

Herman Cain can become the Peoples President. Unlike Obama, Cain’s grassroots support is real not manufactured.

THE PEOPLES PRESIDENT 2012

Herman Cain crushed the so-called first tier candidates Mitt Romney (aka mittens) and Rick Perry in yesterday’s Florida straw poll. Cain’s win is important enough to bring international interest, with the International Business Times calling it a new race.

Surprise, surprise. surprise, (not!) the Sunday talk shows are chattering about Cain defeating Romney and Perry in the Florida straw poll.

What is left unsaid is that the real surprise to them is that the voters are not following the MSM & GOP elites narrative on who is likely to run against the fraud Obama.

Their narrative has no room for Herman Cain and so they barely/rarely cover him. Why bring attention to a man who can really turn this country around, right? And so they speak his name in whispers or not at all! All of that changed yesterday.

One of the lessons to be learned in the 2012 election is name recognition isn’t everything. It’s the message that counts! Simply put so even a Progressive “journalist” can understand, the truth will out!

What the GOP elites and the MSM fail to realize, is that they have made themselves increasingly irrelevant to the voters of America. They are as tone deaf to the voters as Obama is to capitalism.

A Cain victory over Obama is payback by the Birthers and independents for the GOP’s failure to tell the truth about Obama’s ineligibility. It is payback for knowingly leading the nation astray. Obama’s a fake and everyone knows it, with the possible exception of the most rabid Obots.

Even worse than Obama’s fraudulent presidency (Born a Brit, not Legit) has been his clear inability to perform the tasks at hand. BHO likes the pomp and circumstance. but the work needed to truly be the POTUS. God, he is such a waste, such an empty suit!

Unlike Romney (picked by Rove) and Perry (said to be NWO), Cain is not a  bought man, and that boys ‘n girls is like a breath of fresh air.  Unlike Obama, Cain thankfully is not a Progressive!

Over at American Thinker the question was posed, “Is the Cain win an anyone but Romney vote?”  I think not. Cain is the real deal, and he’s Obama’s worst nightmare!

 

 

Share
sandstone - September 25, 2011 - (4)
 
September 2008
M T W T F S S
« Aug   Oct »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  
OBAMA BORN A BRIT NOT LEGIT
Let's be clear. The eligibility requirement for POTUS is natural born citizen, not naturalized citizen, not native born citizen, not citizen of the United States.
Each type of citizenship has a legal definition and is very specific despite the attempts by Team Obama, the co-conspirators in the judiciary, Congress, and the MSM to conflate the terms and bastardize the Presidency.
PANCREATIC CANCER
What if pancreatic cancer strikes your family? Your donation will help fight this deadly disease.
Increase your website traffic with Attracta.com
EXTREME TRACKING
eXTReMe Tracker
copyright

MyFreeCopyright.com Registered & Protected


Welcome , today is Friday, May 18, 2012
This blog is monetized using Are-PayPal WP Plugin SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline