<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HOW GOOD IS PALIN?  IT&#8217;S POSSIBLE MCCAIN WOULD HAVE CHOSEN HER EVEN IF HILLARY WAS ON THE DEM&#8217;S TICKET</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hillarynme.com/2008/08/31/how-good-is-palin-its-possible-mccain-would-have-chosen-her-even-if-hillary-was-on-the-dems-ticket/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hillarynme.com/2008/08/31/how-good-is-palin-its-possible-mccain-would-have-chosen-her-even-if-hillary-was-on-the-dems-ticket/</link>
	<description>. . . thinking out loud about politics, the media, &#38; the Constitution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:29:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: sportsone234</title>
		<link>http://www.hillarynme.com/2008/08/31/how-good-is-palin-its-possible-mccain-would-have-chosen-her-even-if-hillary-was-on-the-dems-ticket/comment-page-1/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>sportsone234</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 01:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hillarynme.wordpress.com/?p=533#comment-169</guid>
		<description>Jeremy

Thank you for your comment. It may be time for all of us to re-think blind party loyalty and the names the media and a host of politicians have used to to divide and separate us.

Of late, McCain has been showing banners with &quot;Country before party.&quot;  I&#039;ve been saying that for weeks along with a long list of former Obamakins, conservatives, independents etc.

We want real change and we are smart to recognize that a good idea is a good idea whether it comes from a Democrat, a Republican, conservative, liberal, independent, whatever!  We need to move this country forward!

It is time for us to take this country back and make the people we elect accountable.  If we&#039;re being honest, the truth is the Republican Congress under Bush 43 was a 6 year partisan failure and the last two years under Pelosi and Reid has also been a failure.

As far as I&#039;m concerned, I&#039;d like to see 80 or 90 % of them replaced. Unfortunately that won&#039;t happen this time but one thing we can&#039;t afford is the Dem&#039;s controlling all three branches of government.

That alone should be a reason to get up and get out and vote for McCain/Palin!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy</p>
<p>Thank you for your comment. It may be time for all of us to re-think blind party loyalty and the names the media and a host of politicians have used to to divide and separate us.</p>
<p>Of late, McCain has been showing banners with &#8220;Country before party.&#8221;  I&#8217;ve been saying that for weeks along with a long list of former Obamakins, conservatives, independents etc.</p>
<p>We want real change and we are smart to recognize that a good idea is a good idea whether it comes from a Democrat, a Republican, conservative, liberal, independent, whatever!  We need to move this country forward!</p>
<p>It is time for us to take this country back and make the people we elect accountable.  If we&#8217;re being honest, the truth is the Republican Congress under Bush 43 was a 6 year partisan failure and the last two years under Pelosi and Reid has also been a failure.</p>
<p>As far as I&#8217;m concerned, I&#8217;d like to see 80 or 90 % of them replaced. Unfortunately that won&#8217;t happen this time but one thing we can&#8217;t afford is the Dem&#8217;s controlling all three branches of government.</p>
<p>That alone should be a reason to get up and get out and vote for McCain/Palin!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sportsone234</title>
		<link>http://www.hillarynme.com/2008/08/31/how-good-is-palin-its-possible-mccain-would-have-chosen-her-even-if-hillary-was-on-the-dems-ticket/comment-page-1/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>sportsone234</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 00:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hillarynme.wordpress.com/?p=533#comment-168</guid>
		<description>Skeptical

Let&#039;s address the pro-choice pro-life topic first.  When it was clear that the radical DNC, the Obama team, and a host others were going to screw Hillary and her supporters, many of us made the following abundantly clear.

Don&#039;t wave the abortion flag in front of us like a red flag in front of a bull and think we will vote for BHO.  One of the reasons is because neonatal science has progressed exponentially since Roe. V Wade became law.

Candidly for me, it was a lot easier to support pro-choice when I thought we were talking about the equivalent of a couple of cells in a petri dish.  Today we know we have a fully formed fetus at 10 weeks.  The concept of a late term abortion is something I can barely comprehend now that I know how close to person hood these fetuses are. If a mother&#039;s life is a stake, for me personally,  that is an exception I can live with.

The truth is this battle will remain with the states, where pro-choice options may be limited but not eliminated.

One of Palin&#039;s first acts as governor was to veto a bill that would have denied gays the same rights as married couples.  That was a reasonable response in my book.  Sounds like a Clintonion resolution similar to the &quot;don&#039;t ask, don&#039;t tell&quot; policy.

My reasons for supporting her are because she had the stones to stand up against the oil companies in her state, to fight corruption and throw the bums out, and because she stopped that boondoggle
that Senator Stevens wanted, the Bridge to Nowhere.

Seems to me you should look at BHO and ask yourself what he really stands for because its not campaign finance reform, or FISA, or endless list of issues he&#039;s flip flopped on.

BTW, isn&#039;t Barry now in favor of &quot;faith based initiatives?&quot;  It was a lousy idea when Bush first proposed it and (as far as I&#039;m concerned) it&#039;s still a lousy idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skeptical</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s address the pro-choice pro-life topic first.  When it was clear that the radical DNC, the Obama team, and a host others were going to screw Hillary and her supporters, many of us made the following abundantly clear.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t wave the abortion flag in front of us like a red flag in front of a bull and think we will vote for BHO.  One of the reasons is because neonatal science has progressed exponentially since Roe. V Wade became law.</p>
<p>Candidly for me, it was a lot easier to support pro-choice when I thought we were talking about the equivalent of a couple of cells in a petri dish.  Today we know we have a fully formed fetus at 10 weeks.  The concept of a late term abortion is something I can barely comprehend now that I know how close to person hood these fetuses are. If a mother&#8217;s life is a stake, for me personally,  that is an exception I can live with.</p>
<p>The truth is this battle will remain with the states, where pro-choice options may be limited but not eliminated.</p>
<p>One of Palin&#8217;s first acts as governor was to veto a bill that would have denied gays the same rights as married couples.  That was a reasonable response in my book.  Sounds like a Clintonion resolution similar to the &#8220;don&#8217;t ask, don&#8217;t tell&#8221; policy.</p>
<p>My reasons for supporting her are because she had the stones to stand up against the oil companies in her state, to fight corruption and throw the bums out, and because she stopped that boondoggle<br />
that Senator Stevens wanted, the Bridge to Nowhere.</p>
<p>Seems to me you should look at BHO and ask yourself what he really stands for because its not campaign finance reform, or FISA, or endless list of issues he&#8217;s flip flopped on.</p>
<p>BTW, isn&#8217;t Barry now in favor of &#8220;faith based initiatives?&#8221;  It was a lousy idea when Bush first proposed it and (as far as I&#8217;m concerned) it&#8217;s still a lousy idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.hillarynme.com/2008/08/31/how-good-is-palin-its-possible-mccain-would-have-chosen-her-even-if-hillary-was-on-the-dems-ticket/comment-page-1/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 23:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hillarynme.wordpress.com/?p=533#comment-167</guid>
		<description>Good for you, you recognize how dangerous BO really is, and how great SP is as our VP Nom!  May God bless them, and they actually make it (it may also surprise you that I am a very conservative republican, but was &quot;pulling&quot; for Hillary Clinton (never had I ever thought that day would come, but it did ;-D..) in the Democratic Primary, heck she may be a democrat, but at least I came to respect her candidacy and believe that BO is another kind of Democrat that is actually dangerous to this nation!!!

Go Palin/McCain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good for you, you recognize how dangerous BO really is, and how great SP is as our VP Nom!  May God bless them, and they actually make it (it may also surprise you that I am a very conservative republican, but was &#8220;pulling&#8221; for Hillary Clinton (never had I ever thought that day would come, but it did ;-D..) in the Democratic Primary, heck she may be a democrat, but at least I came to respect her candidacy and believe that BO is another kind of Democrat that is actually dangerous to this nation!!!</p>
<p>Go Palin/McCain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skeptical</title>
		<link>http://www.hillarynme.com/2008/08/31/how-good-is-palin-its-possible-mccain-would-have-chosen-her-even-if-hillary-was-on-the-dems-ticket/comment-page-1/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Skeptical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 22:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hillarynme.wordpress.com/?p=533#comment-166</guid>
		<description>Let me make sure I understand this. You supported Hillary Clinton, who is pro-choice, supports equality for gays, respects science, and for universal health care. Because she lost the primary to Obama, who shares many of these views, you are now excited by a woman on the extreme religious right, who has the polar opposite view on all those issues?

Okey dokely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me make sure I understand this. You supported Hillary Clinton, who is pro-choice, supports equality for gays, respects science, and for universal health care. Because she lost the primary to Obama, who shares many of these views, you are now excited by a woman on the extreme religious right, who has the polar opposite view on all those issues?</p>
<p>Okey dokely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
